Effect of afferent feedback and central motor commands on soleus H-reflex suppression during arm cycling

Suppression of soleus H-reflex amplitude in stationary legs is seen during rhythmic arm cycling. We examined the influence of various arm-cycling parameters on this interlimb reflex modulation to determine the origin of the effect. We previously showed the suppression to be graded with the frequency of arm cycling but not largely influenced by changes in peripheral input associated with crank length. Here, we more explicitly explored the contribution of afferent feedback related to arm movement on the soleus H-reflex suppression. We explored the influence of load and rate of muscle stretch by manipulating crank-load and arm-muscle vibration during arm cycling. Furthermore, internally driven (“Active”) and externally driven (“Passive”) arm cycling was compared. Soleus H-reflexes were evoked with tibial nerve stimulation during stationary control and rhythmic arm-cycling conditions, including: 1) six different loads; 2) with and without vibration to arm muscles; and 3) Active and Passive conditions. No significant differences were seen in the level of suppression between the different crank loads or between conditions with and without arm-muscle vibration. Furthermore, in contrast to the clear effect seen during active cycling, passive arm cycling did not significantly suppress the soleus H-reflex amplitude. Current results, in conjunction with previous findings, suggest that the afferent feedback examined in these studies is not the primary source responsible for soleus H-reflex suppression. Instead, it appears that central motor commands (supraspinal or spinal in origin) associated with frequency of arm cycling are relatively more dominant sources.

Scaling of the Fore-Aft Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex by Eye Position During Smooth Pursuit

An eye position signal scales the amplitude of compensatory eye velocity in the translational vestibulo-ocular reflex (TVOR). To investigate the origin of such a modulatory signal, we studied the kinematics of the fore-aft TVOR as rhesus monkeys pursued a horizontally moving target at velocities between 0.5 and 30°/s. We found that the “V-shaped” curve of the fore-aft TVOR amplitude as a function of eye position was shifted opposite to the direction of pursuit eye movement. As a result, the tip of the V-shaped curve that occurred close to zero eye position during steady-state fixation was shifted to the right during leftward pursuit and to the left during rightward pursuit eye movements. The faster the pursuit velocity the larger the observed shift. These results suggest that the scaling of the TVOR can precede actual eye position changes by several tens of milliseconds, which averaged 169 ± 87 ms in three rhesus monkeys. Thus, central motor commands, rather than low-level efference copy or proprioceptive information, may be the signals scaling TVOR amplitude.