community clinical oncology program
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e388-e395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Roth ◽  
Ann M. O’Mara ◽  
Nita L. Seibel ◽  
David S. Dickens ◽  
Anne-Marie Langevin ◽  
...  

Purpose: Stagnant outcomes for adolescents and young adults (AYAs; 15 to 39 years old) with cancer are partly attributed to poor enrollment onto clinical trials. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) was developed to improve clinical trial participation in the community setting, where AYAs are most often treated. Further, many CCOP sites had pediatric and medical oncologists with collaborative potential for AYA recruitment and care. For these reasons, we hypothesized that CCOP sites enrolled proportionately more AYAs than non-CCOP sites onto Children’s Oncology Group (COG) trials. Methods: For the 10-year period 2004 through 2013, the NCI Division of Cancer Prevention database was queried to evaluate enrollments into relevant COG studies. The proportional enrollment of AYAs at CCOP and non-CCOP sites was compared and the change in AYA enrollment patterns assessed. All sites were COG member institutions. Results: Although CCOP sites enrolled a higher proportion of patients in cancer control studies than non-CCOP sites (3.5% v 1.8%; P < .001), they enrolled a lower proportion of AYAs (24.1% v 28.2%, respectively; P < .001). Proportional AYA enrollment at CCOP sites decreased during the intervals 2004 through 2008 and 2009 through 2013 (26.7% v 21.7%; P < .001). Conclusion: Despite oncology practice settings that might be expected to achieve otherwise, CCOP sites did not enroll a larger proportion of AYAs in clinical trials than traditional COG institutions. Our findings suggest that the CCOP (now the NCI Community Oncology Research Program) can be leveraged for developing targeted interventions for overcoming AYA enrollment barriers.


Author(s):  
Robin T. Zon

Community research has been an integral and influential component of the National Research Program since the late 1970s. Institutionalization of community research in the Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) has resulted in successful collaborations, meaningful accrual, achievement of quality standards, and translation of research into clinical practice. Although the national clinical trial system is undergoing modernization and improvement, the success of the CCOP and minority-based CCOP in cancer treatment, prevention, and control research is being extended to include cancer care delivery research in the newly created National Cancer Institute (NCI) Community Oncology Research Program. This article briefly presents a historic perspective of community involvement in federally sponsored clinical trials and introduces the continued involvement in the newly created NCI program.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjorie J. Good ◽  
Barbara Lubejko ◽  
Keisha Humphries ◽  
Andrea Medders

Clinical trial workload has been successfully measured and used to guide staffing by the Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program. Further research is needed regarding its applicability to other research programs.


Author(s):  
Worta McCaskill-Stevens ◽  
Alan P. Lyss ◽  
Marge Good ◽  
Thomas Marsland ◽  
Rogerio Lilenbaum

Research in the community setting is essential for the translation of advances in cancer research into practice and improving cancer care for all populations. The National Cancer Institute is proposing a new community-based program, NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP), which is the alignment of two existing programs, the Community Clinical Oncology Program, Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program, and their Research Bases, and the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program. NCROP will support cancer control, prevention, treatment, and screening clinical trials and expand its research scope to include cancer care delivery research. Cancer disparities research will be integrated into studies across the continuum of NCORP research. Input from current NCI-funded community investigators provides critical insight into the challenges faced by oncology practices within various organizational structures. Furthermore, these investigators identify the resources, both administrative and clinical, that will be required in the community setting to support cancer care delivery research and to meet the requirements for a new generation of clinical research. The American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has initiated a forum to focus on the conduct of clinical research in the community setting. Resources are being developed to help practices in managing cancer care in community settings.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e48-e54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Wieder ◽  
Randall Teal ◽  
Tracie Saunders ◽  
Bryan J. Weiner

The authors present a guide to the necessary infrastructure and institutional support that must be in place before considering a program like the Minority-Based Community Clinical Oncology Program.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document