medicare programme
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 344-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Duckett

AbstractThe design of Australia’s Medicare programme was based on the Canadian scheme, adapted somewhat to take account of differences in the constitutional division of powers in the two countries and differences in history. The key elements are very similar: access to hospital services without charge being the core similarity, universal coverage for necessary medical services, albeit with a variable co-payment in Australia, the other. But there are significant differences between the two countries in health programmes – whether or not they are labelled as ‘Medicare’. This paper discusses four areas where Canada could potentially learn from Australia in a positive way. First, Australia has had a national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme for almost 70 years. Second, there have been hesitant extensions to Australia’s Medicare to address the increasing prevalence of people with chronic conditions – extensions which include some payments for allied health professionals, ‘care coordination’ payments, and exploration of ‘health care homes’. Third, Australia has a much more extensive system of support for older people to live in their homes or to move into supported residential care. Fourth, Australia has gone further in driving efficiency in the hospital sector than has Canada. Finally, the paper examines aspects of the Australian health care system that Canada should avoid, including the very high level of out-of-pocket costs, and the role of private acute inpatient provision.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nrupen A Bhavsar ◽  
Sara Constand ◽  
Matthew Harker ◽  
Donald H Taylor

ObjectivesWe examined public reaction to the proposed Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services rule reimbursing physicians for advanced care planning (ACP) discussions with patients.MethodsPublic comments made on regulations.gov were reviewed for relevance to ACP policy and their perceived position on ACP (ie, positive, negative and neutral). Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the results.ResultsA total of 2225 comments were submitted to regulations.gov. On review, 69.0% were categorised as irrelevant; among relevant comments (n=689), 81.1% were positive, 18.6% were negative and 0.002% were neutral. Individuals submitted a greater percentage of the total comments as compared to organisations (63.5% and 36.5%, respectively).ConclusionsThe US Medicare programme is a tax financed social insurance programme that covers all patients 65 years of age and older, including 8 in 10 decedents annually, and it is the part of the US healthcare system most similar to the rest of world. There has been a trend globally towards recognising the importance of aligning patient preferences with care options, including palliative care to deal with advanced life limiting illness. However, ACP is not widely used in the USA, potentially reducing the use of palliative care. Reimbursing ACP discussions between physicians, patients and their family has the potential to have a large impact on the quality of life of persons near death, which can greatly impact public health and the comfort in dealing with our ultimate demise.


BMJ ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 332 (7555) ◽  
pp. 1411.2
Author(s):  
Christopher Zinn
Keyword(s):  

BMJ ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 328 (7440) ◽  
pp. 607 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E Wennberg ◽  
Elliott S Fisher ◽  
Thérèse A Stukel ◽  
Jonathan S Skinner ◽  
Sandra M Sharp ◽  
...  

AbstractObjective To evaluate the use of healthcare resources during the last six months of life among patients of US hospitals with strong reputations for high quality care in managing chronic illness.Design Retrospective cohort study based on claims data from the US Medicare programme.Participants Cohorts receiving most of their hospital care from 77 hospitals that appeared on the 2001 US News and World Report “best hospitals” list for heart and pulmonary disease, cancer, and geriatric services.Main outcome measures Use of healthcare resources in the last six months of life: number of days spent in hospital and in intensive care units; number of physician visits; percentage of patients seeing 10 or more physicians; percentage enrolled in hospice. Terminal care: percentage of deaths occurring in hospital; percentage of deaths occurring in association with a stay in an intensive care unit.Results Extensive variation in each measure existed among the 77 hospital cohorts. Days in hospital per decedent ranged from 9.4 to 27.1 (interquartile range 11.6-16.1); days in intensive care units ranged from 1.6 to 9.5 (2.6-4.5); number of physician visits ranged from 17.6 to 76.2 (25.5-39.5); percentage of patients seeing 10 or more physicians ranged from 16.9% to 58.5% (29.4-43.4%); and hospice enrolment ranged from 10.8% to 43.8% (22.0-32.0%). The percentage of deaths occurring in hospital ranged from 15.9% to 55.6% (35.4-43.1%), and the percentage of deaths associated with a stay in intensive care ranged from 8.4% to 36.8% (20.2-27.1%).Conclusion Striking variation exists in the utilisation of end of life care among US medical centres with strong national reputations for clinical care.


The Lancet ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 363 (9414) ◽  
pp. 1046
Author(s):  
Alicia Ault
Keyword(s):  

2000 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Draper ◽  
I. Solti ◽  
Y. A. Ozcan

This study examines the efficiency of Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) based on a sample of 249 HMOs operating in the United States in 1995. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used to calculate the level of technical efficiency for each HMO included in the sample. Further descriptive analyses were conducted examining various structural and operational characteristics of HMOs and their impact on efficiency. Federal qualification status, Medicare programme participation, combined Medicare and Medicaid programmes participation, chain affiliation and size were found to be significant influences on HMO efficiency.


1982 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Michael Shipley ◽  
Martyn Agass ◽  
Ann Bell ◽  
Peter Catchpole ◽  
John Willetts
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document