Percutaneous Intervention in Diffuse Coronary Disease: Overlapping Versus Single Very Long Stent Technique. Results From the OVERLONG Registry

Background: Both stent length and stent overlap are associated with worse outcomes in the percutaneous treatment of diffuse coronary artery disease (dCAD). However, evidence comparing these issues is scarce. We aimed to compare the results between the use of single very long stent (VLS) and ≥2 overlapping stents (OS) in the treatment of dCAD. Methods: Seven hundred twenty-four consecutive lesions were included: 275 treated with a single VLS (≥40 mm) and 449 with ≥2 OS. Procedural characteristics were assessed, and survival analysis was performed to compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization [TLR], or stent thrombosis) during a median follow-up of 31 months. Results: Procedures with VLS required less contrast volume (268 ± 122 vs 302 ± 113 cm3; P < .01), fluoroscopy time (16 ± 8 vs 21 ± 16 minutes; P < .01), and procedure duration (37 ± 18 vs 47 ± 27 minutes; P < .01) than the OS procedures. The VLS group showed lower incidence of MACE (4.4% vs 10.7%; P < .01), driven mainly by lower TLR rate (1.1% vs 4.7%; P < .01). The use of OS was an independent predictor of MACE. Conclusions: In this study, the use of VLS for the treatment of dCAD was associated with better outcomes compared to OS.

Clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse coronary artery disease following physiology-guided treatment strategy: insights from AJIP registry

Background Physiology-guided treatment strategy improves clinical outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. However, it has not been fully evaluated whether such guideline-based strategy is useful for patients with diffuse coronary artery disease as well, which is known to be one of the major factors affecting morbidity and mortality. Purpose The aim of this study was to clarify clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse coronary artery disease whose treatment strategy was based on coronary physiology. Methods From an international multicentre registry of iFR-pullback, consecutive 1067 patients (1185 vessels) with stable angina were included in whom coronary lesions were deferred or revascularized according to the iFR cutoff: 0.89. The physiological pattern of disease was classified according to the iFR-pullback recording as predominantly physiologically diffuse (n=463) or predominantly physiologically focal (n=722). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), defined as a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization during follow-up period, were compared between diffuse and focal groups, in both deferred and revascularized groups, respectively. Results Mean age was 67.1±10.7 years and 75.8% of patients were men. Median iFR was 0.88 (interquartile range: 0.80 to 0.92). At a median follow-up period of 18 months, no significant differences in MACEs were found between diffuse and focal groups, in both iFR-based deferred and revascularized groups. In the deferred group (n=480), MACEs occurred in 6.9% patients (15/217) in the diffuse group and 8.0% patients (21/263) in the focal group (p=0.44). In the revascularized group (n=705), MACEs occurred in 8.9% patients (22/246) in the diffuse group and 7.2% patients (33/459) in the focal group (p=0.49). Conclusions Despite potentially higher risks in patients with diffuse coronary artery disease, clinical outcomes of those patients were comparable to those of patients without diffuse disease, as long as treatment strategy was based on the physiology guidance, which is globally recommended by international guidelines. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Baseline factors identified for prediction of good responders in patients with end-stage diffuse coronary artery disease undergoing intracoronary CD34+ cell therapy

Background: Treating patients with end-stage diffuse coronary artery disease (EnD-CAD) unsuitable for coronary intervention remains a clinical challenge. They usually express refractory angina and have high risk for mortality. Although growing data have indicated cell therapy is an alternative solution to medical or invasive therapy, there are still lacking useful markers to predict whether heart function will improve in the EnD-CAD patients who underwent circulatory-derived CD34+ cell therapy. By utilizing the baseline variables and results from our previous phase I/II clinical trials, the aim of this study tried to elucidate the variables predictive of the “good response” to CD34+ cell therapy.Methods: This retrospective study included 38 patients in the phase I clinical trial (2011-2014), and 30 patients in the phase II clinical trial (2013-2017). These patients were categorized into “good responders” and “non-responders” according to their 1-year improvement of LVEF ≥7.0% or <7.0% after intracoronary CD34+ cell therapy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed to identify potential independent predictors of good responder to cell therapy, followed by Hosmer–Lemeshow (H-L) test for goodness of fit and prediction power.Results: Among baseline data, multivariate analysis demonstrated that history of former smoker was independently predictive of good responders (p=0.006). On the other hand, male gender, the baseline Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina score ≥3 and grades of LV diastolic dysfunction ≥2 were significantly negative predictors of good responders (all p<0.01). After administration of subcutaneous granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), a higher post-G-CSF neutrophil count in addition to the above four baseline variables also played crucial roles in early prediction of good response to CD34+ cell therapy for EnD-CAD (all p<0.03). The H-L test displayed a good prediction power with sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 85.3% and accuracy 84.4%. Conclusions: Using the results of our phase I/II clinical trials, previous smoking habit, female sex, lower grades of angina score and diastolic dysfunction were identified to be independently predictive of “good response” to CD34+ cell therapy in the patients with EnD-CAD.Trial registration: This is a retrospective analysis based on the phase I (ISRCTN72853206) and II (ISRCTN26002902) clinical trials