Opportunities to Impact Disability: Trends, Costs, and Evidence-Based Interventions

As healthcare shifts to a focus on social determinants and population health, and older adults increasingly seek to “age in community,” it is vital to understand the functional capabilities and related costs for older adults with disability. This symposium will present data on five major areas related to older adult disability. The 1st presenter will describe recent national disability trends. The 2nd will present Medicare costs by disability, dementia, and community-dwelling status in order to illustrate how these different demographic groups vary in Medicare expenditures over time. This information is critical to policymakers and health systems leaders to plan for these populations. They will then describe a 3rd project, which employs a novel longitudinal modeling approach, Group Based Trajectory Modeling, to identify and describe the distinct trajectories of Emergency Department use after incident disability. This work assesses the heterogeneity in health care use after disability, which may be shaped by available supports. The 4th presentation will describe a combined analysis of the 11 sites that have published data from implementations of the CAPABLE program. This program is a 10 session, home-based interprofessional program that provides an occupational therapist, a nurse, and a handyworker to addresses older adults’ self-identified functional goals by enhancing individual capacity and the home environment. Taken together, these presentations can inform interventions and policies that improve the health and quality of life of older adults with disabilities.

Trajectories of Emergency Department Use After Incident Functional Disability

Emergency department (ED) visits for older adults with functional disability may represent unmet needs and are often burdensome to patients and families. While it is known that older adults with functional disability use the ED at high rates, this does not capture the heterogeneity of experience after the onset of disability. Using NHATS, we identified a cohort of older adults with incident disability, or who reported they began to receive help with self-care and/or mobility in the prior year. Using the month that they report first receiving help, we linked to Medicare data to assess quarterly patterns of ED use. We used Group Based Trajectory Modeling to assess the trajectories of ED use after disability. We identified three distinct trajectories of ED use: persistently high, declining, and persistently low. We describe the clinical, household, and sociodemographic characteristics associated with likely membership in each trajectory group.

Comparing primary care Interprofessional and non-interprofessional teams on access to care and health services utilization in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study

Background Many countries, including Canada, have introduced primary care reforms to improve health system functioning and value. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between receiving care from interprofessional primary care teams and after-hours access to care, patient-reported walk-in clinic visits and emergency department use. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study linking population-based administrative databases to Ontario’s Health Care Experience Survey (HCES) between 2012 and 2018. We adjusted for physician group characteristics as well as individual physician and patient characteristics while assessing the relationship between receiving care from interprofessional teams and the outcomes of interest. Results As of March 31st, 2015, there were 465 physician groups with HCES respondents of which 177 (38.0%) were interprofessional teams and 288 (62.0%) were non-interprofessional teams in the same blended capitation reimbursement model. In this period, there were 4518 physicians with HCES respondents, of whom 2131 (47.2%) were in interprofessional teams and 2387 (52.8%) were in non-interprofessional teams. There were 10,102 HCES respondents included in this study, of whom 42.4% were in interprofessional teams and 42.3% were in non-interprofessional teams. After adjustment, we found that being in an interprofessional team was associated with an increase in the odds of patients reporting same/next day access to care by 12.0% (OR = 1.12 CI = 1.00 to 1.24 p-value 0.0436) and a decrease in the odds of patients reporting walk-in clinic use by 16% (OR = 0.84 CI = 0.75 to 0.94 p-value 0.0019). After adjustment, there were no significant differences in patient-reported after-hours access to care and emergency department use. Conclusions Ontario has invested heavily in interprofessional primary care teams. As compared to patients in non-interprofessional teams, patients in interprofessional teams self-reported more timely access to care and less walk-in clinic use but no significant difference in self-reported access to after-hours care or in emergency department use. For jurisdictions aiming to expand physician voluntary participation in interprofessional teams, our study results inform expectations around access to care and health services utilization.