cuneiform bone
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Waleed Saqer ◽  
Atul Bandi ◽  
Salman Hasan ◽  
Maged Mostafa ◽  
Ahmed Refaat Khamis

<p>Accessory ossicles of the foot are not uncommon finding in foot radiographs which has confused radiologists and orthopedic surgeons from time immemorial. Occasionally these bones are symptomatic, hindering daily activities of patients. We present a case report of an eleven years old girl with a symptomatic accessory medial cuneiform on the dorsal aspect of left foot. The child was evaluated radiologically and after a trial of failed conservative treatment, she was operated upon. Intraoperatively a superficial nerve on dorsum of this accessory ossicle was found, and the extra bone was excised. This accessory bone was found to be related to medial cuneiform bone at its dorsal and distal surface making to suggest its name as "Os cuneo-I metatarsale-I dorsale". Detailed radiological evaluation is mandatory for identification and exact anatomical localization of the extra bone before proceeding to excision, when non operative treatment fails to relieve the symptoms.</p><p><strong> </strong></p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1286
Author(s):  
Mukesh Kumar Saini ◽  
Neelam Ramana Reddy ◽  
Pera Jayavardhan Reddy

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (Supl 1) ◽  
pp. 2S
Author(s):  
Gustavo Araújo Nunes ◽  
Otaviano De Oliveira Junior ◽  
Bruno Braga Maciel ◽  
Mateus Martins Marcatti ◽  
Fabricio Melo Bertolini

Introduction: Osteonecrosis is a disease that rarely affects foot bones. When present, it is more commonly found in the talus and navicular bones. Cases of osteonecrosis of the intermediate cuneiform bone are extremely rare, and after a literature review, we found 5 reported cases, all in pediatric patients. Objective: The objective of this study is to report a case of an adult patient with osteonecrosis of the intermediate cuneiform bone that was resistant to conservative treatment, for which we proposed a surgical approach. Results: The patient underwent surgical treatment and showed excellent clinical and radiographic progression, with significant improvements in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and in the pain visual analog scale. He rated the outcome as excellent and reported that he would undergo the procedure again. Conclusion: The authors present a rare case of an adult patient with osteonecrosis of the intermediate cuneiform bone that was surgically treated with decompression and bone grafting and had a good outcome.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901986639
Author(s):  
Jun Young Choi ◽  
Dong Joo Lee ◽  
Reuben Ngissah ◽  
Bum Joon Nam ◽  
Jin Soo Suh

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to define the fracture type and investigate the injuries related to single medial, intermediate, or lateral cuneiform fracture. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2018, 30 consecutive patients (30 cases) who were treated in the single institution for the single cuneiform fractures were reviewed retrospectively. Each fracture was categorized by location and type (intra- or extra-articular avulsion, axial compression, and direct blow). We also investigated the related foot bone fractures or dislocations on the affected side. Results: Twenty-one, one, and eight cases with single medial, intermediate, and lateral cuneiform bone fractures, respectively, were identified. More than two-thirds of the single cuneiform fractures were observed in the medial cuneiform bone. The single medial cuneiform fracture was associated with various types of foot injuries including Lisfranc injury, naviculo-cuneiform joint dislocation, or calcaneo-cuboidal dislocation. Single lateral cuneiform fractures were more frequently observed than single intermediate cuneiform fractures. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of the single cuneiform fractures were observed in the medial cuneiform bone. Most intra-articular avulsion fractures were associated with high-energy trauma. Level of Evidence: 4


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011418S0024
Author(s):  
Takaaki Hirano ◽  
Akiyama Yui ◽  
Hisateru Niki

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Chronic Lisfranc fracture dislocation had been commonly treated with arthrodesis, but were these treatments suitable? The Lisfranc joint has sagittal motion with articular cartilage and functioning as a shock absorber. We reported the middle-term outcomes after performing Lisfranc ligament anatomical reconstruction surgery (LARS), using an optimal route of reconstruction based on anatomical measurements of and biomechanical experiments with cadavers. The purpose of this study is to determine the usefulness of LARS for chronic Lisfranc injuries to preserve the joint function. Methods: We underwent LARS for 8 cases of Chronic Lisfranc injuries (6 males, 2 females) from May 2012 to June 2017. Average age at surgery 26.1 years (18-38), average follow-up period is 28 months (2-46). The reconstruction route was via a burr hole created at a position 6 mm distal to the tarsometatarsal joint on the 2nd metatarsal, and at a depth of 10 mm. A burr hole was then created from the medial cuneiform bone to the 2nd metatarsal bone in a plantar and horizontal direction. The graft tendon was guided through the burr hole from the medial cuneiform bone to the 2nd metatarsal (double-layered side), was looped, and was guided back around the dorsum of the medial cuneiform(single layer) to reconstruct the dorsal ligament. We examined Myerson classification, Kaar evaluation and the postoperative clinical evaluation using Japanese Society for Surgery of Foot (JSSF) midfoot scale. Results: In Myerson classification, Type B2 6 cases and Type C1 2 cases. In Kaar evaluation, transverse instability (TI) 6 cases, longitudinal instability (LI) 2 cases. The average time from injury to surgery is 156 days on average (37-404). JSSF scores averaged 95 points (90-100). X - ray evaluations were almost good, but in 2 cases with weight bearing, a slight diastasis between the base of the first cuneiform and second metatarsal was observed. But there were no clinical symptoms such as pain. In the surgical procedure, scar is mediated in chronic cases. Therefore, we had to take time to obtain the reduction. Conclusion: Arthrodesis is gold standard for chronic Lisfranc joint injuries, but decline in foot flexibility is inevitable. LARS is beneficial for maintaining anatomical reduction, preserving the joint function, and shortening the post-therapy period. LARS gave stable results against Chronic Lisfranc joint injuries. LARS for chronic Lisfranc joint injuries is a useful procedure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 230949901772792
Author(s):  
Mehmet Erduran ◽  
Nihat Acar ◽  
Nihat D Demirkiran ◽  
Kaan Atalay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document