solar magnetic cycle
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

46
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (S340) ◽  
pp. 9-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Jain ◽  
Sushanta Tripathy ◽  
Rudolf Komm ◽  
Frank Hill ◽  
Rosaria Simoniello

AbstractUsing continuous observations for 22 years from ground-based network GONG and space-borne instruments MDI onboard SoHO and HMI onboard SDO, we report both global and local properties of the convection zone and their variations with time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (S340) ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
Travis S. Metcalfe

AbstractAfter decades of effort, the solar magnetic cycle is exceptionally well characterized, but it remains poorly understood. Pioneering work at the Mount Wilson Observatory demonstrated that other Sun-like stars also show regular activity cycles, and identified two distinct relationships between the rotation rate and the length of the cycle. The solar cycle appears to be an outlier, falling between the two stellar relationships, potentially threatening the very foundation of the solar-stellar connection. Recent discoveries emerging from NASA’s Kepler space telescope have started to shed light on this perplexing result, suggesting that the Sun’s rotation rate and magnetic field are currently in a transitional phase that occurs in all middle-aged stars. We have recently identified the manifestation of this magnetic transition in the best available data on stellar cycles. These observations suggest that the solar cycle is currently growing longer on stellar evolutionary timescales, and that the global dynamo may shut down entirely sometime in the next 0.8-2.4 Gyr. Future tests of this hypothesis will come from ground-based activity monitoring of Kepler targets that span the magnetic transition, and from asteroseismology with the TESS mission to determine precise masses and ages for bright stars with known cycles.


2017 ◽  
Vol 609 ◽  
pp. A32 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Modzelewska ◽  
M. V. Alania

Aims. We study features of the 3D solar anisotropy of Galactic cosmic rays (GCR) for 1965−2014 (almost five solar cycles, cycles 20−24). We analyze the 27-day variations of the 2D GCR anisotropy in the ecliptic plane and the north-south anisotropy normal to the ecliptic plane. We study the dependence of the 27-day variation of the 3D GCR anisotropy on the solar cycle and solar magnetic cycle. We demonstrate that the 27-day variations of the GCR intensity and anisotropy can be used as an important tool to study solar wind, solar activity, and heliosphere. Methods. We used the components Ar, Aϕ and At of the 3D GCR anisotropy that were found based on hourly data of neutron monitors (NMs) and muon telescopes (MTs) using the harmonic analyses and spectrographic methods. We corrected the 2D diurnal (~24-h) variation of the GCR intensity for the influence of the Earth magnetic field. We derived the north-south component of the GCR anisotropy based on the GG index, which is calculated as the difference in GCR intensities of the Nagoya multidirectional MTs. Results. We show that the behavior of the 27-day variation of the 3D anisotropy verifies a stable long-lived active heliolongitude on the Sun. This illustrates the usefulness of the 27-day variation of the GCR anisotropy as a unique proxy to study solar wind, solar activity, and heliosphere. We distinguish a tendency of the 22-yr changes in amplitude of the 27-day variation of the 2D anisotropy that is connected with the solar magnetic cycle. We demonstrate that the amplitudes of the 27-day variation of the north-south component of the anisotropy vary with the 11-yr solar cycle, but a dependence of the solar magnetic polarity can hardly be recognized. We show that the 27-day recurrences of the GG index and the At component are highly positively correlated, and both are highly correlated with the By component of the heliospheric magnetic field.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (S335) ◽  
pp. 94-97
Author(s):  
Milton Munroe

All recent models of solar magnetic cycle behaviour assume that the Ω-effect stretches an existing poloidal magnetic field into a toroidal field using differential rotation (Featherstone and Miesch 2015). The α-effect recycles the toroidal field back to a poloidal field by convection and rotation and this is repeated throughout the cycle. Computer simulations based on that conceptual model still leave many questions unanswered. It has not resolved where the solar dynamo is located, what it is or what causes the differential rotation which it takes for granted. Does this paradigm need changing? The conceptual model presented here examines the sun in horizontal sections, analyses its internal structure, presents new characterizations for the solar wind and structures found and shows how their interaction creates rotation, differential rotation, the solar dynamo and the magnetic cycle.


2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (27) ◽  
pp. 2973-2985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie JIANG ◽  
JingXiu WANG ◽  
JingHua ZHANG ◽  
ShaoLan BI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document