Stromal marker fibroblast activation protein drives outcome in T1 non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Fibroblast activation protein-α (FAP) is a transmembrane peptidase and a surrogate marker for cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). FAP has been linked to worse prognosis and therapy resistance in several cancers. We hypothesised that FAP might have a prognostic 3biomarker potential to stratify patients with high-grade (HG) T1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We selected 30 patients with HG T1 NMIBC that progressed to ≥T2 disease which were pair-matched based on CUETO progression score variables with 90 patients that did not progress. After revision a final cohort of 86 patients was retained. Slides were stained for FAP, the luminal marker GATA3 and the basal marker CK5. All HG T1 tumour regions of interest (ROIs) within each patient were annotated, analysed and scored using image analysis software. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs was significantly higher in progressors vs. non-progressors and was prognostic for recurrence-free survival, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival. FAP expression in HG T1 ROIs remained strongly prognostic for these outcomes in a bivariable model corrected for adequate BCG per FDA definition. Expression of GATA3 and CK5 did not differ between progressors vs. non-progressors, and were not prognostic for these outcomes. FAP might serve as an easily applicable prognostic biomarker to risk-stratify patients with HG T1 NMIBC if these results are prospectively validated in a larger series.

Association of FGFR alterations with FGFR 1-4 gene expression in TUR biopsies and matched NMP22 urine levels in early bladder cancer of the prospective real world clinico-pathological register trial: BRIDGister.

e16533 Background: The objective of the present study was to identify molecular charactersitics associated with FGFR positive tumors in matched urine and TUR biopsy samples from patients being suspicious of bladder cancer and undergoing first TURB at the pilot center of the multicentric BRIDGister Real World Experience trial that are helpful for patient management and prognosis. Methods: For this pilot study paraffin fixed pretreatment tissue samples from the first TURB of 28 pts participating in the BRIDGister trial and matched urine samples were prospectively collected and analyzed. RNA from FFPE tissues were extracted by commercial kits and analyzed by Therascreen FGFR IVD kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden). Relative gene expression of subtyping markers (KRT5, KRT0) as well as FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3, FGFR4, ERBB2 was centrally tested by standardized test systems (STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH, Cologne). In addition urine samples were analyzed by commercially available urine tests (UBC Rapid, BTA stat, NMP22). Spearman correlation, Kruskal-Wallis, MannWhitney and Sensitivity/Specificity tests were done by JMP 9.0.0 (SAS software). Results: The pilot cohort of the BRIDGister trial consisted of 28 patients (median age: 73, male 71% vs female 29%) of diverse clinical stages (Benign lesions/no tumor 21%, pTa 32%, pT1 21%, pT2 21%) and WHO 1973 grade (G1 7%, G2 43%, G3 21%). Based on FFPE tissue testing using Therascreen FGFR IVD kit 9 out of 28 patients exhibited FGFR alterations (32%). FGFR positive tumors were associated with high expression of FGFR3 mRNA (r = 5.951, p = 0.0011) but low FGFR1 mRNA as well as FGFR4 mRNA (r = -0.3882, p = 0.0412 and r = -0.6305, p = 0.0004, respectively). Interestingly, FGFR alteration was positively associated with the basal marker KRT5 (r = 0.3929, p = 0.0386), but not with luminal KRT20 mRNA expression (r = -0.0208, p = 0.9179). Moreover FGFR3 altered bladder cancer was associated with elevated NMP22 levels in pretreatment urine (r = 0.3978, p = 0.0361). Conclusions: In early bladder cancer FGFR3 alterations are tightly associated with a characteristic FGFR mRNA signature. Mutation/Fusion of FGFR3 results in high FGFR3 but low FGFR1 and FGFR4 mRNA expression, which might be i.a. relevant for the response to FGFR inhibition and important to predict outcome of FGFR inhibitors. Morever FGFR alteration was associated with elevated NMP22 urine levels, which might be helpful for detecting and monitoring FGFR altered bladder cancer in a non invasive fashion. These results warrant further investigation and its impact on outcome prediction (BCG responsiveness, recurrence, proegression, etc) will be prospectively analyzed in the framework of the ongoing multicenter BRIDGister Real World Experience trial.

A STUDY ON EXPRESSION PROFILE OF BASAL MARKER CD44 AND LUMINAL MARKER CK20 IN UROTHELIAL NEOPLASM AND ITS CORRELATION WITH WHO GRADING AND STAGING OF TUMOUR

Aim: Histomorphological study of urothelial carcinoma on TRBT and Cystectomy specimen and its categorization on the basis of WHO grading & pTNM staging and to nd out the correlation between CK20 and CD44 exprression with tumour grade, pTNM staging. Material And Method: This descriptive cross sectional prospective study was conducted in the Department of Pathology, R G Kar Medical College & Hospital Kolkata in collaboration with Department of Urosurgery, R G Kar Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal. The present study is intended to nd out over expression of CD44 & CK20 in Urothelial Carcinoma of Bladder and correlate with tumour grade and clinical features. Result: There is strong association between CD44, CK20 expression and Stage of Urothelial Carcinoma cases and had a strong association between CD44 expressions and grade Urothelial Carcinoma cases. Conclusion: CK20 overexpression was seen more signicantly in High Grade tumours HGPUC (p < 0.05) as well as advanced stage pT2 and CD44 overexpression was more signicantly in lower grade tumours LGPUC (p<0.05) as well as lower stages pT1 in urothelial carcinoma. An inverse relasionship was noted in the staining patterns of CK20 and CD44 within individual cases as well as aggregate data,with (68.24%) of tumours with CD44 loss showing CK20 positivity.

A comparative study of PCS and PAM50 prostate cancer classification schemes

Background Two prostate cancer (PC) classification methods based on transcriptome profiles, a de novo method referred to as the “Prostate Cancer Classification System” (PCS) and a variation of the established PAM50 breast cancer algorithm, were recently proposed. Both studies concluded that most human PC can be assigned to one of three tumor subtypes, two categorized as luminal and one as basal, suggesting the two methods reflect consistency in underlying biology. Despite the similarity, differences and commonalities between the two classification methods have not yet been reported. Methods Here, we describe a comparison of the PCS and PAM50 classification systems. PCS and PAM50 signatures consisting of 37 (PCS37) and 50 genes, respectively, were used to categorize 9,947 PC patients into PCS and PAM50 classes. Enrichment of hallmark gene sets and luminal and basal marker gene expression were assessed in the same datasets. Finally, survival analysis was performed to compare PCS and PAM50 subtypes in terms of clinical outcomes. Results PCS and PAM50 subtypes show clear differential expression of PCS37 and PAM50 genes. While only three genes are shared in common between the two systems, there is some consensus between three subtype pairs (PCS1 versus Luminal B, PCS2 versus Luminal A, and PCS3 versus Basal) with respect to gene expression, cellular processes, and clinical outcomes. PCS categories displayed better separation of cellular processes and luminal and basal marker gene expression compared to PAM50. Although both PCS1 and Luminal B tumors exhibited the worst clinical outcomes, outcomes between aggressive and less aggressive subtypes were better defined in the PCS system, based on larger hazard ratios observed. Conclusion The PCS and PAM50 classification systems are similar in terms of molecular profiles and clinical outcomes. However, the PCS system exhibits greater separation in multiple clinical outcomes and provides better separation of prostate luminal and basal characteristics.

Nested Variant of Urothelial Carcinoma Is a Luminal Bladder Tumor With Distinct Coexpression of the Basal Marker Cytokeratin 5/6

Objectives The nested variant of urothelial carcinoma (NVUC) is a rare bladder tumor that may possess a luminal molecular phenotype. We sought to determine whether a small immunohistochemical (IHC) panel using common surrogates for molecular phenotypes would reliably classify a cohort of pure NVUC cases. Methods IHC staining with a panel composed of markers for basal subtypes (CK5/6, CK14) and luminal subtypes (FOXA1, GATA3) was performed on pure small NVUC cases (n = 23) and 5 large NVUC cases (n = 5). Scoring of IHC stains was performed semiquantitatively. Individual cases were analyzed using previously reported IHC-based surrogates for molecular subtype. Results The phenotype of NVUC was classified as luminal from 60.1% (FOXA1+/CK5/6−) to 100% (GATA3+/CK14−) of cases using composite phenotypes. No cases possessed a basal or squamous cell carcinoma–like phenotype. The majority of small NVUC cases (69.5%) showed subset CK5/6 expression distinctly localized to the basal layers of tumor cell nests. Intratumoral heterogeneity was also noted in CK5/6 (21.7% of small NVUC cases) but no other markers. Conclusions NVUC appears to express markers of both basal and luminal bladder tumors. Definitive gene expression profiling may be valuable to further characterize this unique histologic variant.

BRCA1 Promoter Hypermethylation is Associated with Good Prognosis and Chemosensitivity in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

The aberrant hypermethylation of BRCA1 promoter CpG islands induces the decreased expression of BRCA1 (Breast Cancer 1) protein. It can be detected in sporadic breast cancer without BRCA1 pathogenic variants, particularly in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). We investigated BRCA1 hypermethylation status (by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (MS-PCR) and MassARRAY® assays), and BRCA1 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC), and their clinicopathological significance in 248 chemotherapy-naïve TNBC samples. Fifty-five tumors (22%) exhibited BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation, with a high concordance rate between MS-PCR and MassARRAY® results. Promoter hypermethylation was associated with reduced IHC BRCA1 protein expression (p = 0.005), and expression of Programmed death-ligand 1 protein (PD-L1) by tumor and immune cells (p = 0.03 and 0.011, respectively). A trend was found between promoter hypermethylation and basal marker staining (p = 0.058), and between BRCA1 expression and a basal-like phenotype. In multivariate analysis, relapse-free survival was significantly associated with N stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and histological subtype. Overall survival was significantly associated with T and N stage, histology, and adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, patients with tumors harboring BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation derived the most benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In conclusion, BRCA1 promoter hypermethylation is associated with TNBC sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy, basal-like features and PD-L1 expression. BRCA1 IHC expression is not a good surrogate marker for promoter hypermethylation and is not independently associated with prognosis. Association between promoter hypermethylation and sensitivity to Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase PARP inhibitors needs to be evaluated in a specific series of patients.

Prostate adenocarcinoma of secretory type with wide expression of p63 and negativity of the basal marker Ck5/6: Rare subtype of adenocarcinoma of secretory origin and to be differentiated from basal cell carcinoma. Review of literature

We report a case of prostate carcinoma with wide nuclear expression for p63. These cases are rare and show atypical cytoplasmic/membrane expression of Ck5/6, alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase and high-molecular-weight cytokeratin. It is rare to find this type of carcinoma with negativity for Ck5/6. We would like to present this case to avoid a diagnostic pitfall and with review of literature to understand the origin of this rare subtype.

The basal phenotype as a clinically relevant indicator of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer.

154 Background: Trastuzumab (Herceptin) resistance remains a clinical challenge but the mechanism is not well understood. Recently, studies have identified a subset of Her2+ breast cancer called basal HER2 that expresses basal genes. We investigated the effect of basal gene expression on Herceptin response in HER2+ breast cancer cell lines and on prognosis in HER2+ breast cancer patients. Methods: Non-basal (BT474, SKBR3) and basal (HCC1569, HCC1954, JIMT-1) HER2+ cell lines were chosen based on basal cytokeratin expression. Cell proliferation was assessed after treatment with vehicle, Herceptin (H), Paclitaxel (P), H+P, Akt Inhibitor (AI), and H+AI. HER2 signaling was examined using immunoblotting of p-Akt and p-ERK. Because breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) are linked to basal breast tumors and treatment resistance, we assessed BCSC activity using mammosphere formation and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) positivity. Immunohistochemical staining of HER2+ breast cancers for basal markers CK5/6, CK14, and EGFR was correlated with clinicopathologic features and survival in 88 patients with Stage 1-3 HER2+ breast cancer treated with Herceptin. Results: Basal HER2 cells were resistant to Herceptin compared to non-basal HER2 cells but this resistance was overcome by Akt inhibition. Immunoblotting showed that non-basal HER2 cells had decreased p-Akt after Herceptin treatment which was not seen in basal HER2 cells. There was no difference in p-ERK levels after Herceptin therapy in all cell lines. Basal HER2 cells had increased mammosphere formation and ALDH positivity suggesting higher stem cell activity compared to non-basal HER2 cells. Of the HER2+ patients, 33/88 (37.5%) expressed at least one basal marker. Basal Her2 tumors were associated with higher grade (p = 0.04) and more ER/PR negativity (p < 0.01). CK14 expression correlated with worse overall survival by log-rank test (p = 0.02), while EGFR showed a similar trend (p = 0.06). Conclusions: Basal HER2 breast cancer cell lines have Herceptin resistance which may be due to constitutively active Akt signaling and increased stem cell activity. Clinically, basal marker expression predicts Herceptin resistance and worse outcomes in HER2+ breast cancer patients.