Review on the Thermal Performance on the Basis of Different Types of Material used in Ball Bearings

Bearing is a movable object, so frictional forces must be overcome in terms of moving the Bearing. To decrease the friction force on the movable methodology, different kinds of bearings have been used. The bearing gets its characterized by the fact that it is used to support a rotating axle or shaft. Because rolling bearings utilize balls or rollers, they are referred to as "rolling components." one can measure bearing expected lifespan depending on the material exhaustion if one can understand the operations and maintenance of loads and speeds. These computations should be based on the assumption that now the bearing is appropriately installed, lubricated, and moreover treated. It is unable to account for the impact of detrimental operating environment. Damaged bearing has a significant economic and industrial implications. Numerous substance are used in the bearing sector to several bearing elements. To achieve maximum bearing performance and durability, the products are deposited to obtain intended characteristics. The components listed in this are the most frequently used. The different materials used in ball bearings are discussed in this paper.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM PERJANJIAN FIDUSIA

Fiduciary is the transfer of ownership rights to an object on the basis of trust provided that the object whose ownership rights are transferred remains in the control of the owner of the object. While the Fiduciary guarantee in accordance with Article 1 paragraph 2 of Law no. 42 of 1999 is a security right on a movable object, both tangible and intangible and immovable objects, especially buildings that cannot be encumbered with mortgage rights. Research Methods in this scientific papers using normative juridical research methods. As well as using data collection techniques carried out using descriptive analysis techniques, with secondary data sources, which include primary legal materials such as laws and regulations relating to fiduciary and mortgage rights. The results in this research can beexplained that as referred to in Act No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights which remains in the control of the fiduciary, as collateral for the repayment of certain debts and gives priority to other creditors. Fiduciary guarantees can be carried out and stipulated in afiduciary certificate which is authorized by a notary. With this certificate, it can also be used as a protection for both parties, both as a borrower and as a lender, no one is harmed.

ANALISIS YURIDIS HAK CIPTA YANG DIJADIKAN JAMINAN FIDUSIA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAK CIPTA DI BANK BTPN [JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF COPYRIGHTS USED AS FIDUCIARY GUARANTEES BASED ON COPYRIGHT LAWS AT BANK BTPN]

<p><em>The development of the creative industry in Indonesia is a supporting factor for entrepreneurs to increase their working capital in order to develop their business. The increase of capital can be done by applying for a loan from the bank. In accordance with prudential principles in banking, one of the important factors that must be included in credit agreement is collateral. Creative industry players, usually can only provide Intellectual Property Rights (HKI), specifically Copyright, as collateral. Since Copyright is classified as intangible movable object, Copyright can be used as collateral by fiduciary basis. The aim of this research is to review the basis of regulations regarding Copyright as a fiduciary security and its implementation at BTPN. As a normative juridical research, this research is based on the analysis of legal norms, from the Civil Code, Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary, Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and any other related regulations. From this research, it can be concluded that further regulations is still required to regulate Copyright as collateral. In addition, an appraisal institution is also needed to ensure that the economic value of Copyright can be used as collateral security with the loan value.<strong></strong></em><strong><em> </em></strong></p><p><strong><em></em></strong><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: </strong>Perkembangan industri kreatif di Indonesia menjadi faktor pendorong pelaku usaha untuk meningkatkan modal kerja guna mengembangkan usahanya. Peningkatan modal ini dapat dilakukan dengan cara mengajukan kredit kepada bank. Sesuai dengan prinsip kehati-hatian bank, salah satu faktor penting yang harus ada dalam perjanjian kredit adalah jaminan. Para pelaku industri kreatif biasanya hanya bisa menyerahkan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI), khususnya Hak Cipta, sebagai jaminan. Karena Hak Cipta tergolong benda bergerak tidak berwujud, maka Hak Cipta dapat dijadikan jaminan fidusia. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji landasan peraturan mengenai Hak Cipta sebagai jaminan fidusia dan implementasinya pada bank BTPN. Sebagai penelitian yuridis normatif, penelitian ini berdasarkan pada analisis norma-norma hukum, yaitu Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta serta peraturan-peraturan terkait lainnya. Dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa masih dibutuhkan adanya peraturan khusus yang mengatur lebih lanjut mengenai Hak Cipta sebagai jaminan kredit. Selain itu, diperlukan pula lembaga <em>appraisal</em>untuk memastikan nilai ekonomi Hak Cipta dapat digunakan sebagai jaminan kredit secara sepadan dengan nilai utangnya.</p>

Pemberian Kredit Perbankan dengan Jaminan Hak Cipta

The main function of Indonesian banking is as a collector and distributor of funds from the community which aims to support the implementation of national development towards improving the welfare of the people. Article 16 (3) of Copyright Law regulates that Copyright as an intangible movable object can be used as an object of fiduciary security. This means, financial institutions, both bank and non-bank, will accept copyright as a credit collateral. This research aims to see the application of credit provision with copyright guarantees and legal remedies that can be taken to protect banks in case of default on loans filed with copyright guarantees. This research is a normative study using documentary studies. The research was found that Copyright Law implicitly states that copyright is an object of fiduciary security, This regulation as stated in Article 16 paragraph (3) requires a detailed explanation, because it relates to a guarantee at the bank itself to produce a refund process from the debtor to the creditor.

Land Rights Execution as a Pledge Object Based on MoU with PT. Pegadaian at the Office of Agrarian Affairs Ministry and National Land Agency

Cooperation Agreement between the Production Director of PT Pegadaian (Persero) and the Secretary General of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Number 352/S-00015.02/2018, Number 31/SKB-100/IV/2018. The content of the agreement is that the land certificate, especially productive land belonging to agriculture, can be used as collateral for which a mortgage is imposed in PT Pegadaian (Persero). The imposition of a certificate of land rights as collateral for a mortgage is interesting to discuss by discussing the problem of objects as collateral and the imposition and execution of collateral object rights when the debtor defaults, a conclusion is obtained as follows: Objects as collateral and the imposition, that the types of objects are distinguished between movable objects and non-movable objects. If the differentiation of objects is used as collateral, there is also a distinction. A movable object which is charged with a pledge, is required to transfer of ownership right from the giver to the recipient with the threat of cancellation if the delivery is not made. Non-movable objects are burdened with mandatory register of mortgage rights at the Land Office, the Land Office will issue a certificate of mortgage right which has the power of evidence as a court decision which has permanent legal force. Execution of the collateral object rights when the debtor defaults, if the debtor defaults does not carry out his/her obligation to pay off the debt, then at the pledge, the creditor can execute based on the provisions of Article 1150 B.W., while in the mortgage right if the debtor defaults and does not fulfill obligations voluntarily can execute according to the provisions of Article 14 UUHT (Mortgage Rights to Land and Land-Related Objects).

Optimization of Copyright as Fiduciary Guarantee in Increasing Business Productivity

This study aims to determine how the requirements for transferring economic rights to copyright optimization as a Fiduciary Guarantee in increasing business productivity, how to determine the economic value in optimizing Copyright as Fiduciary Guarantee in increasing business productivity, and what are the roles and responsibilities of a Notary in making a Guarantee Act. Fiduciary on Copyright in increasing business productivity. The theory used is utility / utilitarianism theory, reward theory, legal certainty theory, and legal responsibility theory. The results of the study show that copyright can be an object of Fiduciary Guarantee due to exclusive rights, namely economic rights owned by the copyright owner. The method used is a normative legal research method. Techniques for studying and analyzing legal materials are using documentary studies. The results of the research show that copyright can be used as an object of Fiduciary Security because copyright is a movable object that is not tangible and that can be transferred to only economic rights to be guaranteed. The requirements for the transfer of economic rights follow the procedures stipulated by UUJF. The current method of assessing the economic value of a Copyright is by using quantitative methods. It consists of a market approach, an income approach and a cost approach. The role of the notary in this case in making the fiduciary guarantee deed has been mentioned in Article 5 paragraph (1) of the UUJF and is based on the responsibilities in effect since taking the oath of office as regulated in Article 65 of the UUJN. Notaries do not participate and are responsible for determining the economic value of a copyright. This is the duty and authority of the Appraisal Agency.

Karakteristik Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia

A creator has the exclusive right to enjoy his own creation or to give permission to others to use his creation. The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of copyright that have the prospect of being used as collateral for credit, because copyright has economic value and can be transferred either entirely or partly because of inheritance, grants, wills, written agreements or other justified reasons. by laws and regulations. The method used is a type of normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results show that the characteristics of copyright as a fuduciary guarantee, which is an intangible movable object, can be used as an object of fiduciary security, even though the determination of the value or nominal value of copyright has no standard provisions, but parties can ask for advice from experts.

ANALISA PEMBELIAN BARANG UNDERPRICED SEBAGI BENTUK KESALAHAN DELIK PENADAHAN: TINJAUAN YURIDIS YURISPRUDENSI MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 2/YUR/PID/2018

The purpose of this article is to find out the application of Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 2 / Yur / Pid / 2018 which provides legal rules related to underpriced purchases as the fulfillment of the element "should be suspected that it was obtained from criminal offenses" in the offense. This research is legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. The research results obtained are the application of the new legal rules in the Supreme Court Jurisprudence Number 2 / Yur / Pid / 2018 to the element of negligence in the offense delimitation in Article 480 of the Criminal Code. are required by law and do not exercise caution as required by law which is an element of negligence. In the element of not making guesses as required by law, it is related to the inner attitude of society in general, wherein movable objects the authorities are considered as the owner and society, in general, cannot know the market price of each movable object. This is different from immovable objects, where the authorities are not always the owners, where ownership is generally based on certificates so that the general public can know the price of the immovable object. In its development, registered and unregistered objects were born, whereas, in registered objects, the general public could find out the price of these registered objects, because ownership of these registered objects could be known publicly. About not taking the precautions required by law, which must be seen whether there is a behavior of the defendant to take preventive measures related to the origin of the goods, where when the buyer/seller has taken precautionary measures, it can be said that the buyer/seller has done the duty to be careful so that it cannot be said that negligence has occurred.