tumor plasticity
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett L. Ruff ◽  
Kristin E. Murphy ◽  
Zachary R. Smith ◽  
Paula M. Vertino ◽  
Patrick J. Murphy

Abstract Background Chromatin state provides a clear decipherable blueprint for maintenance of transcriptional patterns, exemplifying a mitotically stable form of cellular programming in dividing cells. In this regard, genomic studies of chromatin states within cancerous tissues have the potential to uncover novel aspects of tumor biology and unique mechanisms associated with disease phenotypes and outcomes. The degree to which chromatin state differences occur in accordance with breast cancer features has not been established. Methods We applied a series of unsupervised computational methods to identify chromatin and molecular differences associated with discrete physiologies across human breast cancer tumors. Results Chromatin patterns alone are capable of stratifying tumors in association with cancer subtype and disease progression. Major differences occur at DNA motifs for the transcription factor FOXA1, in hormone receptor-positive tumors, and motifs for SOX9 in Basal-like tumors. We find that one potential driver of this effect, the histone chaperone ANP32E, is inversely correlated with tumor progression and relaxation of chromatin at FOXA1 binding sites. Tumors with high levels of ANP32E exhibit an immune response and proliferative gene expression signature, whereas tumors with low ANP32E levels appear programmed for differentiation. Conclusions Our results indicate that ANP32E may function through chromatin state regulation to control breast cancer differentiation and tumor plasticity. This study sets a precedent for future computational studies of chromatin changes in carcinogenesis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Neha Singh ◽  
Varune R. Ramnarine ◽  
Jin H. Song ◽  
Ritu Pandey ◽  
Sathish K. R. Padi ◽  
...  

AbstractNeuroendocrine (NE) prostate cancer (NEPC) is a lethal subtype of castration-resistant prostate cancer (PCa) arising either de novo or from transdifferentiated prostate adenocarcinoma following androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Extensive computational analysis has identified a high degree of association between the long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) H19 and NEPC, with the longest isoform highly expressed in NEPC. H19 regulates PCa lineage plasticity by driving a bidirectional cell identity of NE phenotype (H19 overexpression) or luminal phenotype (H19 knockdown). It contributes to treatment resistance, with the knockdown of H19 re-sensitizing PCa to ADT. It is also essential for the proliferation and invasion of NEPC. H19 levels are negatively regulated by androgen signaling via androgen receptor (AR). When androgen is absent SOX2 levels increase, driving H19 transcription and facilitating transdifferentiation. H19 facilitates the PRC2 complex in regulating methylation changes at H3K27me3/H3K4me3 histone sites of AR-driven and NEPC-related genes. Additionally, this lncRNA induces alterations in genome-wide DNA methylation on CpG sites, further regulating genes associated with the NEPC phenotype. Our clinical data identify H19 as a candidate diagnostic marker and predictive marker of NEPC with elevated H19 levels associated with an increased probability of biochemical recurrence and metastatic disease in patients receiving ADT. Here we report H19 as an early upstream regulator of cell fate, plasticity, and treatment resistance in NEPC that can reverse/transform cells to a treatable form of PCa once therapeutically deactivated.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 4496
Author(s):  
Ralf Hass ◽  
Juliane von der Ohe ◽  
Thomas Dittmar

The generation of cancer hybrid cells by intra-tumoral cell fusion opens new avenues for tumor plasticity to develop cancer stem cells with altered properties, to escape from immune surveillance, to change metastatic behavior, and to broaden drug responsiveness/resistance. Genomic instability and chromosomal rearrangements in bi- or multinucleated aneuploid cancer hybrid cells contribute to these new functions. However, the significance of cell fusion in tumorigenesis is controversial with respect to the low frequency of cancer cell fusion events and a clonal advantage of surviving cancer hybrid cells following a post-hybrid selection process. This review highlights alternative processes of cancer hybrid cell development such as entosis, emperipolesis, cannibalism, therapy-induced polyploidization/endoreduplication, horizontal or lateral gene transfer, and focusses on the predominant mechanisms of cell fusion. Based upon new properties of cancer hybrid cells the arising clinical consequences of the subsequent tumor heterogeneity after cancer cell fusion represent a major therapeutic challenge.


Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1534
Author(s):  
Aleksander Salomon-Perzyński ◽  
Krzysztof Jamroziak ◽  
Eliza Głodkowska-Mrówka

Plasma cell dyscrasias are a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by the expansion of bone marrow plasma cells. Malignant transformation of plasma cells depends on the continuity of events resulting in a sequence of well-defined disease stages, from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) through smoldering myeloma (SMM) to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Evolution of a pre-malignant cell into a malignant cell, as well as further tumor progression, dissemination, and relapse, require development of multiple driver lesions conferring selective advantage of the dominant clone and allowing subsequent evolution under selective pressure of microenvironment and treatment. This process of natural selection facilitates tumor plasticity leading to the formation of genetically complex and heterogenous tumors that are notoriously difficult to treat. Better understanding of the mechanisms underlying tumor evolution in MM and identification of lesions driving the evolution from the premalignant clone is therefore a key to development of effective treatment and long-term disease control. Here, we review recent advances in clonal evolution patterns and genomic landscape dynamics of MM, focusing on their clinical implications.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 3897
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Buart ◽  
Stéphane Terry ◽  
M’boyba Khadija Diop ◽  
Philippe Dessen ◽  
Sophie Couvé ◽  
...  

Von Hippel–Lindau disease (VHL) is a rare hereditary syndrome due to mutations of the VHL tumor suppressor gene. Patients harboring the R167Q mutation of the VHL gene have a high risk of developing ccRCCs. We asked whether the R167Q mutation with critical aspects of pseudo-hypoxia interferes with tumor plasticity. For this purpose, we used wild-type VHL (WT-VHL) and VHL-R167Q reconstituted cells. We showed that WT-VHL and VHL-R167Q expression had a similar effect on cell morphology and colony formation. However, cells transfected with VHL-R167Q display an intermediate, HIF2-dependent, epithelial–mesenchymal phenotype. Using RNA sequencing, we showed that this mutation upregulates the expression of genes involved in the hypoxia pathway, indicating that such mutation is conferring an enhanced pseudo-hypoxic state. Importantly, this hypoxic state correlates with the induction of genes belonging to epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) and stemness pathways, as revealed by GSEA TCGA analysis. Moreover, among these deregulated genes, we identified nine genes specifically associated with a poor patient survival in the TCGA KIRC dataset. Together, these observations support the hypothesis that a discrete VHL point mutation interferes with tumor plasticity and may impact cell behavior by exacerbating phenotypic switching. A better understanding of the role of this mutation might guide the search for more effective treatments to combat ccRCCs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garrett L Ruff ◽  
Kristin E Murphy ◽  
Paula M Vertino ◽  
Patrick J Murphy

Despite highly advanced diagnosis and treatment strategies, breast cancer patient outcomes vary extensively, even among individuals with the same diagnosis. Thus, a better understanding of the unique molecular characteristics that underlie tumor trajectories and responses to therapy remains a central goal. We report that chromatin patterns represent an important characteristic, capable of stratifying tumor identity and progression. We find that patterns of chromatin accessibility can be classified into 3 major groups, representing Basal-like tumors, hormone receptor (HR)-expressing tumors, and invasive lobular Luminal-A tumors. Major chromatin differences occur throughout the genome at motifs for the transcription factor FOXA1 in HR-positive tumors, and motifs for SOX9 in Basal-like tumors. A large portion of lobular Luminal-A tumors display a chromatin signature defined by accessibility at FOXA1 binding motifs, distinguishing them from others within this subtype. Expression of the histone chaperone ANP32E is inversely correlated with tumor progression and chromatin accessibility at FOXA1 binding sites. Tumors with high levels of ANP32E exhibit an immune response and proliferative gene expression signature, whereas tumors with low ANP32E levels appear programmed for differentiation. Our results indicate that ANP32E may function through chromatin state regulation to control breast cancer differentiation and tumor plasticity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda W. Yu ◽  
Daniela F. Quail

Glioblastoma is a highly lethal brain cancer with a median survival rate of less than 15 months when treated with the current standard of care, which consists of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. With the recent success of immunotherapy in other aggressive cancers such as advanced melanoma and advanced non-small cell lung cancer, glioblastoma has been brought to the forefront of immunotherapy research. Resistance to therapy has been a major challenge across a multitude of experimental candidates and no immunotherapies have been approved for glioblastoma to-date. Intra- and inter-tumoral heterogeneity, an inherently immunosuppressive environment and tumor plasticity remain barriers to be overcome. Moreover, the unique tissue-specific interactions between the central nervous system and the peripheral immune system present an additional challenge for immune-based therapies. Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence that these challenges may be overcome, and immunotherapy continues to be actively pursued in glioblastoma. Herein, we review the primary ongoing immunotherapy candidates for glioblastoma with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors, myeloid-targeted therapies, vaccines and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapies. We further provide insight on mechanisms of resistance and how our understanding of these mechanisms may pave the way for more effective immunotherapeutics against glioblastoma.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark P Labrecque ◽  
Joshi J Alumkal ◽  
Ilsa M Coleman ◽  
Peter S Nelson ◽  
Colm Morrissey

The use of androgen deprivation therapy and second line anti-androgens in prostate cancer has led to the emergence of tumors employing multiple androgen receptor (AR)-dependent and AR-independent mechanisms to resist AR targeted therapies in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). While the AR signaling axis remains the cornerstone for therapeutic development in CRPC, a clearer understanding of the heterogeneous biology of CRPC tumors is needed for inno-vative treatment strategies. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of CRPC tumors that lack AR activity and the temporal and spatial considerations for the conversion of an AR-dependent to an AR-independent tumor type. We describe the more prevalent treatment-emergent phenotypes aris-ing in the CRPC disease continuum, including amphicrine, AR-low, double-negative, neuroendo-crine and small cell phenotypes. We discuss the association between the loss of AR activity and tumor plasticity with a focus on the roles of transcription factors like SOX2, DNA methylation, alterna-tive splicing, and the activity of epigenetic modifiers like EZH2, BRD4, LSD1, and the nBAF complex in conversion to a neuroendocrine or small cell phenotype in CRPC. We hypothesize that only a subset of CRPC tumors have the propensity for tumor plasticity and conversion to the neuroendo-crine phenotype and outline how we might target these plastic and emergent phenotypes in CRPC. In conclusion, we assess the current and future avenues for treatment and determine that the heter-ogeneity of CRPCs lacking AR activity will require diverse treatment approaches.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 177
Author(s):  
Haitang Yang ◽  
Feng Yao ◽  
Paul F. Davis ◽  
Swee T. Tan ◽  
Sean R. R. Hall

Regulatory networks controlling cellular plasticity, important during early development, can re-emerge after tissue injury and premalignant transformation. One such regulatory molecule is the cell surface ectoenzyme ecto-5′-nucleotidase that hydrolyzes the conversion of extracellular adenosine monophosphate to adenosine (eADO). Ecto-5′-nucleotidase (NT5E) or cluster of differentiation 73 (CD73), is an enzyme that is encoded by NT5E in humans. In normal tissue, CD73-mediated generation of eADO has important pleiotropic functions ranging from the promotion of cell growth and survival, to potent immunosuppression mediated through purinergic G protein-coupled adenosine receptors. Importantly, tumors also utilize several mechanisms mediated by CD73 to resist therapeutics and in particular, evade the host immune system, leading to undesired resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Tumor cell CD73 upregulation is associated with worse clinical outcomes in a variety of cancers. Emerging evidence indicates a link between tumor cell stemness with a limited host anti-tumor immune response. In this review, we provide an overview of a growing body of evidence supporting the pro-tumorigenic role of CD73 and adenosine signaling. We also discuss data that support a link between CD73 expression and tumor plasticity, contributing to dissemination as well as treatment resistance. Collectively, targeting CD73 may represent a novel treatment approach for solid cancers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document