Validity, Agreement and Accuracy of A Hand-Held Dynamometer for Shoulder Muscles Strength Assessment in Healthy Individuals

Background: The shoulder complex has a high prevalence of injuries. It is fundamental to quantify the muscle strength and identify muscular imbalances that predispose to lesions. The aim was to test concurrent validation of the muscle strength assessment with a hand held dynamometer (HHD) for shoulder joint muscles, and measure the accuracy and diagnostic agreement between instruments for assessing the strength of this joint with the hand held dynamometer and isokinetic dynamometer (ID) in a population of healthy individuals Methods: healthy individuals aged between 18 and 40 years were included. The HHD was used to test the isometric contraction of the main shoulder movements. Isometric contraction was performed for 3 seconds. Assessments with HHD and DI were performed on the same day, with a minimum interval of 90 minutes between tests. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee by report No.1537948. Concurrent validation was calculated with Pearson’s correlation, the accuracy obtained by the ROC curve and agreement by Kappa test. Results: The HHD showed concurrent validation between 0.51 – 0.83, with sensitivity between 0.90 and 0.98 and specificity between 0.64 and 0.89 for shoulder movements. The HHD demonstrated moderately-strong to excellent concurrent validity. Conclusion: These results are encouraging for the routine use of this portable and lower cost instrument in quantification of the pique torque of the shoulder muscles. Moreover, this instrument showed good accuracy and moderate to high agreement in comparison with diagnosis of the gold standard instrument.

The Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale: Assessing Predictive and Concurrent Validation

To complement and enhance readiness-monitoring capability, the Acute Readiness Monitoring Scale (ARMS) was developed: a widely applicable, simple psychometric measure of perceived readiness. While this tool may have widespread utility in sport and military settings, it remains unknown if the ARMS demonstrates predictive and concurrent validity. Here, we investigated whether the ARMS is: (1) responsive to an acute manipulation of readiness using sleep deprivation, (2) relates to biological markers of readiness [cortisol/heart-rate variability (HRV)], and (3) predicts performance on a cognitive task. Thirty young adults (aged 23 ± 4 years; 18 females) participated. All participants engaged in a 24-h sleep deprivation protocol. Participants completed the ARMS, biological measures of readiness (salivary cortisol, HRV), and cognitive performance measures (psychomotor vigilance task) before, immediately after, 24-, and 48-h post-sleep deprivation. All six of the ARMS subscales changed in response to sleep deprivation: scores on each subscale worsened (indicating reductions in perceived readiness) immediately after sleep deprivation, returning to baseline 24/48 h post. Lower perceived readiness was associated with reduced awakening responses in cortisol and predicted worse cognitive performance (slower reaction time). No relationship was observed between the ARMS and HRV, nor between any biological markers of readiness (cortisol/HRV) and cognitive performance. These data suggest that the ARMS may hold practical utility in detecting, or screening for, the wide range of deleterious effects caused by sleep deprivation; may constitute a quick, cheap, and easily interpreted alternative to biological measures of readiness; and may be used to monitor or mitigate potential underperformance on tasks requiring attention and vigilance.

The integration of the Q-method as an alternative validation tool for Design Science Research Study

Advances in human-centered design require researchers to integrate user preferences into system design. Therefore, we propose to support the concurrent validation of design science research by using the Q-methodology.

Criterion validity of the Key Question for screening at-risk alcohol use in primary healthcare

OBJECTIVE To perform criterion validation of the Key Question in Portuguese for screening at-risk alcohol use among users of Primary Healthcare services. METHOD This is a psychometric study conducted with users of a Primary Healthcare service located in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Participants responded to the Key Question which was applied in conjunction with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C for concurrent validation and measurement of psychometric properties. RESULTS The sample consisted of 518 users. The Key Question presented 59% specificity and 99% sensitivity with respect to the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-C in the general population. The accuracy was 81% in relation to this instrument. There was no influence of sociodemographic variables such as gender on the psychometric properties of the Key Question. CONCLUSION The results indicate that the Key Question in Portuguese presented satisfactory psychometric qualities and suggest that its Portuguese version is as efficient for screening at-risk alcohol use as its reference standard, which subsidizes its use in Primary Healthcare.