Oligo-heterotrophic activity of Marinobacter subterrani creates an indirect Fe(II)-oxidation phenotype in gradient tubes

Autotrophic bacteria utilizing Fe(II) as their energy and electron sources for growth affect multiple biogeochemical cycles. Some chemoheterotrophic bacteria have also been considered to exhibit an Fe(II) oxidation phenotype. For example, several Marinobacter strains have been reported to oxidize Fe(II) based on formation of oxidized iron bands in semi-solid gradient tubes that produce opposing concentration gradients of Fe(II) and oxygen. While gradient tubes are a simple and visually compelling method to test for Fe(II) oxidation, this method alone cannot confirm if, and to what extent, Fe(II) oxidation is linked to metabolism in chemoheterotrophic bacteria. Here we probe the possibility of protein-mediated and metabolic byproduct-mediated Fe(II) oxidation in Marinobacter subterrani JG233, a chemoheterotroph previously proposed to oxidize Fe(II). Results from conditional and mutant studies, along with measurements of Fe(II) oxidation rates suggest M. subterrani is unlikely to facilitate Fe(II) oxidation under microaerobic conditions. We conclude that the Fe(II) oxidation phenotype observed in gradient tubes inoculated with M. subterrani JG233 is a result of oligo-heterotrophic activity, shifting the location where oxygen dependent chemical Fe(II) oxidation occurs, rather than a biologically-mediated process. Importance Gradient tubes are the most commonly used method to isolate and identify neutrophilic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacteria. The formation of oxidized iron bands in gradient tubes provides a compelling assay to ascribe the ability to oxidize Fe(II) to autotrophic bacteria whose growth is dependent on Fe(II) oxidation. However, the physiological significance of Fe(II) oxidation in chemoheterotrophic bacteria is less well understood. Our work suggests that oligo-heterotrophic activity of certain bacteria may create a false-positive phenotype in gradient tubes by altering the location of the abiotic, oxygen-mediated oxidized iron band. Based on the results and analysis presented here, we caution against utilizing gradient tubes as the sole evidence for the capability of a strain to oxidize Fe(II) and that additional experiments are necessary to ascribe this phenotype to new isolates.

Elimination of Manganese(II,III) Oxidation in Pseudomonas putida GB-1 by a Double Knockout of Two Putative Multicopper Oxidase Genes

ABSTRACTBacterial manganese(II) oxidation impacts the redox cycling of Mn, other elements, and compounds in the environment; therefore, it is important to understand the mechanisms of and enzymes responsible for Mn(II) oxidation. In several Mn(II)-oxidizing organisms, the identified Mn(II) oxidase belongs to either the multicopper oxidase (MCO) or the heme peroxidase family of proteins. However, the identity of the oxidase inPseudomonas putidaGB-1 has long remained unknown. To identify theP. putidaGB-1 oxidase, we searched its genome and found several homologues of known or suspected Mn(II) oxidase-encoding genes (mnxG,mofA,moxA, andmopA). To narrow this list, we assumed that the Mn(II) oxidase gene would be conserved among Mn(II)-oxidizing pseudomonads but not in nonoxidizers and performed a genome comparison to 11Pseudomonasspecies. We further assumed that the oxidase gene would be regulated by MnxR, a transcription factor required for Mn(II) oxidation. Two loci met all these criteria: PputGB1_2447, which encodes an MCO homologous to MnxG, and PputGB1_2665, which encodes an MCO with very low homology to MofA. In-frame deletions of each locus resulted in strains that retained some ability to oxidize Mn(II) or Mn(III); loss of oxidation was attained only upon deletion of both genes. These results suggest that PputGB1_2447 and PputGB1_2665 encode two MCOs that are independently capable of oxidizing both Mn(II) and Mn(III). The purpose of this redundancy is unclear; however, differences in oxidation phenotype for the single mutants suggest specialization in function for the two enzymes.