pulmonary stretch receptors
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

102
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

28
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Mark Harrison

This chapter describes the pathophysiology of the respiratory system as it applies to Emergency Medicine, and in particular the Primary FRCEM examination. The chapter outlines the key details of the control of ventilation, reflexes, pressure, chemical, and irritant receptors, J receptors, pulmonary stretch receptors, Golgi tendon organs, muscle spindles, lung volumes, pulmonary mechanics, oxygen and carbon dioxide transport, DO2/VO2 relationships, carbon monoxide, pulse oximetry, effects of altitude, and dysbarism. This chapter is laid out exactly following the RCEM syllabus, to allow easy reference and consolidation of learning.


2009 ◽  
Vol 364 (1529) ◽  
pp. 2517-2526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Mörschel ◽  
Mathias Dutschmann

Control of the timing of the inspiratory/expiratory (IE) phase transition is a hallmark of respiratory pattern formation. In principle, sensory feedback from pulmonary stretch receptors (Breuer–Hering reflex, BHR) is seen as the major controller for the IE phase transition, while pontine-based control of IE phase transition by both the pontine Kölliker–Fuse nucleus (KF) and parabrachial complex is seen as a secondary or backup mechanism. However, previous studies have shown that the BHR can habituate in vivo . Thus, habituation reduces sensory feedback, so the role of the pons, and specifically the KF, for IE phase transition may increase dramatically. Pontine-mediated control of the IE phase transition is not completely understood. In the present review, we discuss existing models for ponto-medullary interaction that may be involved in the control of inspiratory duration and IE transition. We also present intracellular recordings of pontine respiratory units derived from an in situ intra-arterially perfused brainstem preparation of rats. With the absence of lung inflation, this preparation generates a normal respiratory pattern and many of the recorded pontine units demonstrated phasic respiratory-related activity. The analysis of changes in membrane potentials of pontine respiratory neurons has allowed us to propose a number of pontine-medullary interactions not considered before. The involvement of these putative interactions in pontine-mediated control of IE phase transitions is discussed.


2006 ◽  
Vol 1107 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shigeji Matsumoto ◽  
Chikako Saiki ◽  
Shinki Yoshida ◽  
Mamoru Takeda ◽  
Yumi Kumagai

2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Fiona Bailey ◽  
Ralph F. Fregosi

Here we review the influence of bronchopulmonary receptors (slowly and rapidly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors, and pulmonary/bronchial C-fiber receptors) on respiratory-related motor output to upper airway muscles acting on the larynx, tongue, and hyoid arch. Review of the literature shows that all muscles in all three regions are profoundly inhibited by lung inflation, which excites slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors. This widespread coactivation includes the recruitment of muscles that have opposing mechanical actions, suggesting that the stiffness of upper airway muscles is highly regulated. A profound lack of information on the modulation of upper airway muscles by rapidly adapting receptors and bronchopulmonary C-fiber receptors prohibits formulation of a conclusive opinion as to their actions and underscores an urgent need for new studies in this area. The preponderance of the data support the view that discharge arising in slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors plays an important role in the initiation of the widespread and highly coordinated recruitment of laryngeal, tongue, and hyoid muscles during airway obstruction.


2006 ◽  
Vol 101 (2) ◽  
pp. 628-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Widdicombe

Historical aspects of respiratory reflexes from the lungs and airways are reviewed, up until about 10 yr ago. For most of the 19th century, the possible reflex inputs into the “respiratory center,” the position of which had been identified, were very speculative. There was little concept of reflex control of the pattern of breathing. Then, in 1868, Breuer published his paper on “The self-steering of respiration via the Nervus Vagus.” For the first time this established the role of vagal inflation and deflation reflexes in determining the pattern of breathing. Head later extended Breuer’s work, and Kratschmer laid a similar basis for reflexes from the nose and larynx. Then, 50–60 yr later, the development of the thermionic valve and the oscilloscope allowed recording action potentials from single nerve fibers in the vagus. In 1933, Adrian showed that slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors were responsible for the inflation reflex. Later, Knowlton and Larrabee described rapidly adapting receptors and showed that they mediated deep augmented breaths and the deflation reflex. Still later, it was established that rapidly adapting receptors were, at least in part, responsible for cough. In 1954, Paintal began his study of C-fiber receptors (J receptors), work greatly extended by the Coleridges. Since ∼10 yr ago, when the field of this review stops, there has been an explosion of research on lung and airway receptors, many aspects of which are dealt with in other papers in this series.


2006 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 594-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Sindelar ◽  
Anders Jonzon ◽  
Andreas Schulze ◽  
Gunnar Sedin

Single units of slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptors (PSRs) were investigated in anesthetized cats during spontaneous breathing on continuous positive airway pressure (2–5 cmH2O), before and after lung lavage and then after instillation of surfactant to determine the PSR response to surfactant replacement. PSRs were classified as high threshold (HT) and low threshold (LT), and their instantaneous impulse frequency ( fimp) was related to transpulmonary pressure (Ptp) and tidal volume (Vt). Both the total number of impulses and maximal fimp of HT and LT PSRs decreased after lung lavage (55 and 45%, respectively) in the presence of increased Ptp and decreased Vt. While Ptp decreased markedly and Vt remained unchanged after surfactant instillation, all except one PSR responded with increased total number of impulses and maximal fimp (42 and 26%, respectively). Some HT PSRs ceased to discharge after lung lavage but recovered after surfactant instillation. The end-expiratory activity of LT PSRs increased or was regained after surfactant instillation. After instillation of surfactant, respiratory rate increased further with a shorter inspiratory time, resulting in a lower inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio. Arterial pH decreased (7.31 ± 0.04 vs. 7.22 ± 0.06) and Pco2 increased (5.5 ± 0.7 vs. 7.2 ± 1.3 kPa) after lung lavage, but they were the same after as before instillation of surfactant (pH = 7.21 ± 0.08 and Pco2 = 7.6 ± 1.4 kPa) during spontaneous breathing. In conclusion, surfactant instillation increased lung compliance, which, in turn, increased the activity of both HT and LT PSRs. A further increase in respiratory rate due to a shorter inspiratory time after surfactant instillation suggests that the partially restored PSR activity after surfactant instillation affected the breathing pattern.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document