Breast Conserving Surgery-What, When and for Whom?

Breast conservation surgery and radiation therapy to the breast has revolutionized the treatment of breast cancer over the last few decades. Surgical direction had seen a heightened interest in the performance of cosmetically superior partial and segmental resections in breast conservation as well as increased demand by patients for breast preservation. The broadening of approaches to delivery of breast irradiation from whole breast to accelerated partial breast has allowed more patients to opt for breast conservation and allowed for what appears to be comparable measurable outcomes in emerging data. As well, the addition of state-of-the-art chemotherapeutic and hormonal therapies has allowed improved outcomes of patients from both local regional recurrence and overall survival standpoints. This paper will provide an overview of BCS including patients selection, prerequisit, indications, contraindications, procedures, complications and follow up. Faridpur Med. Coll. J. Jan 2020;15(1): 34-37

Utilization of breast preservation treatments in Hispanic patients with breast cancer: An analysis from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2000 to 2011.

76 Background: In contrast to mastectomy, radiotherapy (RT) treatments for breast cancer (BC) patients, allows for the benefits of breast preservation therapy and brachytherapy (BT) is a very convenient and short course of RT. BT use in BC has increased since FDA approval in 2002, however, has it been used evenly among races? Methods: Trends of treatment were analyzed for BC patients stages Tis to IV using the NCDB and 2.015.671 cases were found. Specific analysis of treatment differences between Black, White and Hispanic races, and the use of BT was performed. Results: The use of surgery as the only treatment in BC patients has decreased in stages 0 to IV (-7%, -11%, -8%, -6% and -6%; p<0.0001), while the use of RT has increased in stages 0 to III (+5%, +1%, +3%, +8%; p<0.0001). The use of chemotherapy has also increased in stages 0, I, III, IV (+3%, +4%, +7%, +5%; p<0.0001), while decreased in stage II (-3%; p<0.0001). Hispanic patients, received less RT in stages I to III (-4.11%, -5.46%, -4.84%; p<0.05), while White’s in stage I and III (58.11%, 65.98%), and Black’s in stage II (52.19%) received more RT (p<0.05). In addition, Hispanic’s received significantly more mastectomy in stages I, II and IV. BT as a type of RT was used mainly in stages 0 to II. In stages III and IV its use was <0.13%. 50.836 patients stage 0-II received BT. In this group of patients, BT increased from 0.35% in 2000 to 9,76% in 2008 (p<0,0001), and from then, decreased to 8.28% in 2011 (p<0.0001). There are also significant differences between races. In White’s BT increased 11.33% in 2008 which is 1.46 more times than in Black’s and 1.79 more than Hispanic, and then decreased to 9.52% in 2011 which is 1.61 more than in Black’s, and 1.64 more than Hispanic’s. Conclusions: The use of breast preservation RT has increased significantly in stages 0 to III from year 2000 to 2011. BT use increased until year 2008, when it begun to decrease until year 2009, stabilizing in 2010 and 2011 at around 8%. There are significant differences between races in the use of RT in general, and BT in particular, being Hispanic’s the ones which significantly received less breast preservation RT treatment. This finding raises important questions.