Associations between early efficiency in language processing and learning outcomes in children born full term and preterm: Similarities and differences

Associations between children’s early language processing efficiency and later language, literacy, and non-verbal outcomes shed light on the extent to which early information processing skills support later learning across domains. Examining whether the strengths of associations are similar in typically developing and at risk populations provides an additional lens into the varying routes to learning that children take across development. We compared patterns of associations between early language processing efficiency (accuracy and reaction time) in the looking-while-listening (LWL) task and school-relevant skills in children born full-term (FT) and preterm (PT). Participants (n=94, 49 FT, 45 PT) were assessed in the LWL task at 18 months (corrected for degree of prematurity in PT group) and on standardized tests of expressive language, pre-literacy (print knowledge and phonological awareness), and non-verbal IQ at 4 ½ years. Early language processing efficiency was associated with later language and pre-literacy outcomes (r2 change ranged from 19.8 to 7.1, p < 0.01) to a similar extent in PT and FT children, controlling for age at test and SES, suggesting similar mechanisms of learning in these domains for PT and FT children. However, birth group moderated the association between reaction time and non-verbal IQ (r2 change 4.5, p < 0.05), such that an association was found in the PT but not the FT group. This finding suggests that information processing skills reflected in efficiency of real-time language processing may be recruited to support learning in a broader range of domains in the PT compared to the FT group.

Associations between early efficiency in language processing and learning outcomes in children born full term and preterm: Similarities and differences

•Associations between early language processing efficiency in toddlerhood and later standardized test performance inform the extent to which information processing skills support learning across domains.•Comparing patterns of associations in children from different clinical groups (e.g., children born full term and preterm) further informs whether neurobiological risk alters developmental pathways.•Early language processing efficiency was associated with language and pre-literacy outcomes to a similar extent for preterm and full term children, suggesting similar underlying mechanisms. •Association between processing speed and non-verbal IQ differed by group; processing speed supports learning in a broader range of domains in preterm than term children.

Toward a “Standard Model” of Early Language Learning

A standard model is a theoretical framework that synthesizes observables into a quantitative consensus. Have researchers made progress toward this kind of synthesis for children’s early language learning? Many computational models of early vocabulary learning assume that individual words are learned through an accumulation of environmental input. This assumption is also implicit in empirical work that emphasizes links between language input and learning outcomes. However, models have typically focused on average performance, whereas empirical work has focused on variability. To model individual variability, we relate the tradition of research on accumulator models to item response theory models from psychometrics. This formal connection reveals that currently available data sets do not allow researchers to test the resulting models fully, illustrating a critical need for theory to contribute to shaping new data collection and creating and testing an eventual standard model.

Higher Order Thinking Skills of Children Aged 4-6 Years in Early Language Learning Based on Lesson Study

This study aims to describe the higher order thinking skills of children aged 4-6 years in early language learning based on lesson study. The research method used descriptive qualitative. The subjects of this study were B group students of Telkom Preschool Ternate in 2020/2021 academic year. Data collection was carried out using direct observation, in-depth interviews and documentation that explored children's abilities of critical and creative thinking aspects. Data were analyzed which followed to the three main steps; data reduction, data presentation and verification, and concluding. The study found that early language learning based-on lesson study activities can stimulate children's abilities in critical aspect; 18 students (81.8%) answered questions and retold and 4 students (18.2%) are able to interpret stories. Meanwhile, in creative thinking aspects 10 students (45.5%) have criteria that often appear of completing assignments in the form of the work given by the teacher. The children identify the problem, giving various responses and comments; become active learner both collaboratively in completing sharing and jumping tasks on ‘ profession’

Bilingual language development in infancy: What can we do to support bilingual families?

Many infants and children around the world grow up exposed to two or more languages. Their success in learning each of their languages is a direct consequence of the quantity and quality of their everyday language experience, including at home, in daycare and preschools, and in the broader community context. Here, we discuss how research on early language learning can inform policies that promote successful bilingual development across the varied contexts in which infants and children live and learn. Throughout our discussions, we highlight that each individual child’s experience is unique. In fact, it seems that there are as many ways to grow up bilingual as there are bilingual children. To promote successful bilingual development, we need policies that acknowledge this variability and support frequent exposure to high-quality experience in each of a child’s languages.

Reverse Engineering Language Acquisition with Child-Centered Long-Form Recordings

Language use in everyday life can be studied using lightweight, wearable recorders that collect long-form recordings—that is, audio (including speech) over whole days. The hardware and software underlying this technique are increasingly accessible and inexpensive, and these data are revolutionizing the language acquisition field. We first place this technique into the broader context of the current ways of studying both the input being received by children and children's own language production, laying out the main advantages and drawbacks of long-form recordings. We then go on to argue that a unique advantage of long-form recordings is that they can fuel realistic models of early language acquisition that use speech to represent children's input and/or to establish production benchmarks. To enable the field to make the most of this unique empirical and conceptual contribution, we outline what this reverse engineering approach from long-form recordings entails, why it is useful, and how to evaluate success. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Linguistics, Volume 8 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.