M184V/I does not impact the efficacy of abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir use as switch therapy in virologically suppressed patients

Background M184V/I NRTI resistance mutations can be selected by either lamivudine/emtricitabine or abacavir. There are controversies about the use of abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir combinations in HIV-1-infected treatment-experienced patients with a fully suppressed HIV viral load (VL) and harbouring M184V/I. Objectives We assessed the efficacy of abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir when used in HIV-infected pretreated patients with an undetectable VL who previously harboured M184V/I as a unique NRTI resistance mutation in a genotypic resistance test and had no resistance to integrase inhibitors. Patients and methods A total of 154 patients with a fully suppressed HIV-1 plasma VL (<50 copies/mL) treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine/boosted PI or abacavir/lamivudine/boosted PI who switched to an abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir regimen and had M184V/I as a unique NRTI resistance mutation in their therapeutic history were retrospectively analysed up to 12 months after the switch to abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir. Assessment of residual viraemia was performed at Months 1, 3, 6 and 12. Plasma VL with undetectable HIV-1 RNA corresponded to an absence of residual viraemia. Results During the 12 months of follow-up, three patients had a blip of VL (53, 62 and 106 copies/mL) at Month 3 followed by a subsequent VL <50 copies/mL. No patient harboured a virological failure during the follow-up. Moreover, there was no change in residual viraemia during the follow-up. Conclusions M184V/I as a unique NRTI resistance mutation, regardless of possible selection by regimens containing lamivudine/emtricitabine or abacavir, does not affect the virological response of well-controlled patients who switched to abacavir/lamivudine/dolutegravir for at least 12 months.