heteroduplex rejection
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujani Chakraborty ◽  
Beata Mackenroth ◽  
David Shalloway ◽  
Eric Alani

AbstractRecombination between divergent DNA sequences is actively prevented by heteroduplex rejection mechanisms. In baker’s yeast such anti-recombination mechanisms can be initiated by the recognition of DNA mismatches in heteroduplex DNA by MSH proteins, followed by recruitment of the Sgs1-Top3-Rmi1 helicase-topoisomerase complex to unwind the recombination intermediate. We previously showed that the repair/rejection decision during single-strand annealing recombination is temporally regulated by MSH protein levels and by factors that excise non-homologous single-stranded tails. These observations, coupled with recent studies indicating that mismatch repair factors interact with components of the histone chaperone machinery, encouraged us to explore roles for epigenetic factors and chromatin conformation in regulating the decision to reject vs. repair recombination between divergent DNA substrates. This work involved the use of an inverted repeat recombination assay thought to measure sister chromatid repair during DNA replication. Our observations are consistent with the histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106 and the histone deacetylase Sir2 acting to suppress heteroduplex rejection and the Rpd3, Hst3 and Hst4 deacetylases acting to promote heteroduplex rejection. These observations and double mutant analysis have led to a model in which nucleosomes located at DNA lesions stabilize recombination intermediates and compete with mismatch repair factors that mediate heteroduplex rejection.SummaryRecombination between divergent DNA sequences is actively prevented by heteroduplex rejection mechanisms. In this study we explored roles for epigenetic factors and chromatin conformation in regulating the decision to reject vs. repair recombination between divergent DNA substrates. Our observations are consistent with the histone chaperones CAF-1 and Rtt106 and the histone deacetylase Sir2 acting to suppress heteroduplex rejection and the Rpd3, Hst3 and Hst4 deacetylases acting to promote heteroduplex rejection. These observations have led to a model in which nucleosomes located at DNA lesions stabilize recombination intermediates and compete with mismatch repair factors that mediate heteroduplex rejection.


Science ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 334 (6063) ◽  
pp. 1713-1716 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Hombauer ◽  
A. Srivatsan ◽  
C. D. Putnam ◽  
R. D. Kolodner

Genetics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 154 (4) ◽  
pp. 1913-1916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franklin W Stahl ◽  
Kenneth J Hillers

Genetics ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 153 (2) ◽  
pp. 555-572 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth J Hillers ◽  
Franklin W Stahl

Abstract In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, some gene loci manifest gradients in the frequency of aberrant segregation in meiosis, with the high end of each gradient corresponding to a hotspot for DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). The slope of a gradient is reduced when mismatch repair functions fail to act upon heteroduplex DNA—aberrant segregation frequencies at the low end of the gradient are higher in the absence of mismatch repair. Two models for the role of mismatch repair functions in the generation of meiotic “conversion gradients” have been proposed. The heteroduplex rejection model suggests that recognition of mismatches by mismatch repair enzymes limits hybrid DNA flanking the site of a DSB. The restoration-conversion model proposes that mismatch repair does not affect the length of hybrid DNA, but instead increasingly favors restoration of Mendelian segregation over full conversion with increasing distance from the DSB site. In our experiment designed to distinguish between these two models, data for one subset of well repairable mismatches in the HIS4 gene failed to show restoration-type repair but did indicate reduction in the length of hybrid DNA, supporting the heteroduplex rejection model. However, another subset of data manifested restoration-type repair, indicating a relationship between Holliday junction resolution and mismatch repair. We also present evidence for the infrequent formation of symmetric hybrid DNA during meiotic DSB repair.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document