The Role of the Interleukin-17 Axis and Neutrophils in the Pathogenesis of Endemic and Systemic Mycoses

Systemic and endemic mycoses are considered life-threatening respiratory diseases which are caused by a group of dimorphic fungal pathogens belonging to the genera Histoplasma, Coccidioides, Blastomyces, Paracoccidioides, Talaromyces, and the newly described pathogen Emergomyces. T-cell mediated immunity, mainly T helper (Th)1 and Th17 responses, are essential for protection against these dimorphic fungi; thus, IL-17 production is associated with neutrophil and macrophage recruitment at the site of infection accompanied by chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines production, a mechanism that is mediated by some pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), including Dectin-1, Dectine-2, TLRs, Mannose receptor (MR), Galectin-3 and NLPR3, and the adaptor molecules caspase adaptor recruitment domain family member 9 (Card9), and myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88). However, these PRRs play distinctly different roles for each pathogen. Furthermore, neutrophils have been confirmed as a source of IL-17, and different neutrophil subsets and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) have also been described as participating in the inflammatory process in these fungal infections. However, both the Th17/IL-17 axis and neutrophils appear to play different roles, being beneficial mediating fungal controls or detrimental promoting disease pathologies depending on the fungal agent. This review will focus on highlighting the role of the IL-17 axis and neutrophils in the main endemic and systemic mycoses: histoplasmosis, coccidioidomycosis, blastomycosis, and paracoccidioidomycosis.

Legionella pneumophila Excludes Autophagy Adaptors from the Ubiquitin-Labeled Vacuole in Which It Resides

ABSTRACT Xenophagy targets intracellular pathogens for destruction by the host autophagy pathway. Ubiquitin chains are conjugated to xenophagic targets and recruit multiple autophagy adaptors. The intracellular pathogen Legionella pneumophila resides in a vacuole that is ubiquitinated; however, this pathogen avoids xenophagic detection. Here, the mechanisms by which L. pneumophila can prevent the host xenophagy pathway from targeting the vacuole in which it resides were examined. Ubiquitin-labeled vacuoles containing L. pneumophila failed to recruit autophagy adaptors by a process that was independent of RavZ function. Coinfection studies were conducted using a strain of Listeria monocytogenes that served as a robust xenophagic target. Legionella pneumophila infection blocked xenophagic targeting of L. monocytogenes by a RavZ-dependent mechanism. Importantly, when coinfection studies were conducted with a RavZ-deficient strain of L. pneumophila, L. monocytogenes was targeted by the host xenophagy system but vacuoles containing L. pneumophila avoided targeting. Enhanced adaptor recruitment to the vacuole was observed by using a strain of L. pneumophila in which all of the effector proteins in the SidE family were deleted; however, this strain was still not targeted by the host autophagy pathway. Thus, there are at least two pathways by which L. pneumophila can disrupt xenophagic targeting of the vacuole in which it resides. One mechanism involves global disruption of the host autophagy machinery by the effector protein RavZ. A second cis-acting mechanism prevents the binding of autophagy adaptors to the ubiquitin-decorated surface of the L. pneumophila-containing vacuole.

Global proteomic profiling of primary macrophages during M. tuberculosis infection identifies TAX1BP1 as a mediator of autophagy targeting

Macrophages are highly plastic cells that adopt diverse functional capabilities and play critical roles in immunity, cancer, and tissue homeostasis, but how these different cell fates and activities are triggered in response to their environmental cues is not well understood. We used new proteomic tools to identify protein post-translational modifications (PTMs) that control antibacterial responses of macrophages. Here, we report an unbiased and global analysis of the changes in host protein abundance, phosphorylation, and ubiquitylation, during the first 24-hours of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection of primary macrophages. We discovered 1379 proteins with changes in their phosphorylation state and 591 proteins with changes in their ubiquitylation in response to Mtb infection. We identified pathways regulated by phosphorylation and ubiquitylation that weren’t reflected by changes in protein abundance, indicating that the activity of these pathways was regulated. These include pathways known to be regulated by ubiquitylation and phosphorylation (e.g. autophagy) as well as pathways that were not known to be regulated during Mtb infection (e.g. nucleocytoplasmic transport and mRNA metabolism). We identified an enrichment in phosphorylation of autophagy receptors (TAX1BP1, p62, optineurin, BNIP3L), several of which were not previously implicated in the host response to Mtb infection. We found that p62 deficiency blocks ubiquitylation and TAX1BP1 deficiency enhances ubiquitylation, suggesting p62 ubiquitylation acts as an amplification loop by promoting downstream adaptor recruitment and serves as a platform for recruitment of ubiquitin. Our results show that TAX1BP1 mediates clearance of ubiquitylated Mtb and targets the bacteria to LC3-positive phagophores. Taken together, our proteomic profiling is likely a valuable resource for initiating mechanistic studies of macrophage biology.

The Association of the Adaptor Complexes AP1 and AP3 with GLUT4 Vesicles: Implications for GLUT4 Compartmentalisation

By using glycerol density gradients of post-plasma membrane supernatants from rat adipocytes, we have been able to separate the compartment containing GLUT4 from that containing transferrin receptors. The major pool of GLUT4 (≈ 80%) is localised to dense fractions, which also contain VAMP2, while the remainder is in lighter fractions, some of which also contain transferrin receptors. AP1 and AP3 complexes are detected in two fractions, the heavier of which co-sediments with the major pool of GLUT4. Nycodenz gradients have been used to examine the in vitro effects of GTP-γ-S on adaptor recruitment. On addition of GTPγS, GLUT4 vesicles fractionate as a heavier population of vesicles, which we suggest is due to a coating reaction. Under these conditions there is an increase in co-sedimentation of GLUT4 with API, but not with AP3. Western blotting of proteins associated with isolated GLUT4 vesicles shows the presence of AP1 and AP3 adaptor complexes. Cell free, in vitro association of the AP1 complex with GLUT4 vesicles is increased 3-fold by the addition of GTP-γ-S and an ATP regenerating system to the post-plasma membrane lysate. and 4-fold by carrying out the incubation at 37°C compared with 0°C. These data demonstrate that GLUT4 subcellular localisation can be studied in isolated fractions and that GLUT4 compartments are associated with at least two distinct adaptor complexes.

The Role of ADP-ribosylation Factor and Phospholipase D in Adaptor Recruitment

AP-1 and AP-2 adaptors are recruited onto the TGN and plasma membrane, respectively. GTPγS stimulates the recruitment of AP-1 onto the TGN but causes AP-2 to bind to an endosomal compartment (Seaman, M.N.J., C.L. Ball, and M.S. Robinson. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 123:1093–1105). We have used subcellular fractionation followed by Western blotting, as well as immunofluorescence and immunogold electron microscopy, to investigate both the recruitment of AP-2 adaptors onto the plasma membrane and their targeting to endosomes, and we have also examined the recruitment of AP-1 under the same conditions. Two lines of evidence indicate that the GTPγS-induced targeting of AP-2 to endosomes is mediated by ADP-ribosylation factor-1 (ARF1). First, GTPγS loses its effect when added to ARF-depleted cytosol, but this effect is restored by the addition of recombinant myristoylated ARF1. Second, adding constitutively active Q71L ARF1 to the cytosol has the same effect as adding GTPγS. The endosomal membranes that recruit AP-2 adaptors have little ARF1 or any of the other ARFs associated with them, suggesting that ARF may be acting catalytically. The ARFs have been shown to activate phospholipase D (PLD), and we find that addition of exogenous PLD has the same effect as GTPγS or Q71L ARF1. Neomycin, which inhibits endogenous PLD by binding to its cofactor phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate, prevents the recruitment of AP-2 not only onto endosomes but also onto the plasma membrane, suggesting that both events are mediated by PLD. Surprisingly, however, neither PLD nor neomycin has any effect on the recruitment of AP-1 adaptors onto the TGN, even though AP-1 recruitment is ARF mediated. These results indicate that different mechanisms are used for the recruitment of AP-1 and AP-2.