Implementing an enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery programme in the Netherlands: a qualitative study investigating facilitators and barriers for implementation

ObjectivesThis study aims to elucidate determinants for succesful implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery (ERATS) protocol for perioperative care for surgical lung cancer patients in the Netherlands.SettingLung cancer operations are performed in both academic and regional hospitals, either by cardiothoracic or general thoracic surgeons. Limiting the impact of these operations by optimising and standardising perioperative care with the ERATS protocol is thought to enable reduction in length of stay, complications and costs.ParticipantsA broad spectrum of stakeholders in perioperative care for patients with lung resection participated in this study, ranging from patient representatives, healthcare professionals to an insurance company representative.InterventionsSemistructured interviews (N=14) were conducted with the stakeholders (N=18). The interviews were conducted one on one by telephone and two times, face to face, in small groups. Verbatim transcriptions of these interviews were coded for the purpose of thematic analysis.Outcome measuresDeterminants for successful implementation of the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands.ResultsSeveral determinants correspond with previous publications: having a multidisciplinary team, leadership from a senior clinician and support from an ERAS-coordinator as facilitators; lack of feedback on performance and absence of management support as barriers. Our study underscores the potential detrimental effect of inconsistent communication, the lack of support in the transition from hospital to home and the barrier posed by lack of accessible audit data.ConclusionsBased on a structured problem analysis among a wide selection of stakeholders, this study provides a solid basis for choosing adequate implementation strategies to introduce the ERATS protocol in the Netherlands. Emphasis on consistent and sufficient communication, support in the transition from hospital to home and adequate audit and feedback data, in addition to established implementation strategies for ERAS-type programmes, will enable a tailored approach to implementation of ERATS in the Dutch context.

Who is Included in Digital Health Technologies to Support Hospital to Home Transitions for Older Adults?: Secondary analysis of a rapid review and equity-informed recommendations (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Digital health technologies have been proposed to support hospital to home transitions for older adults. The COVID-19 pandemic and associated physical distancing guidelines propelled a shift to digital health technologies. However, the characteristics of older adults who participated in digital health interventions to support hospital to home transitions remain unclear. This information is needed to assess whether current digital health technologies are generalizable to the needs of broader older adult populations. OBJECTIVE We conducted a rapid review of the existing literature to: i) identify the characteristics of the populations targeted by studies testing the implementation of digital health interventions that are designed to support hospital to home transitions, ii) identify the characteristics of the samples included within studies testing digital health interventions used to support hospital to home transitions, and iii) create recommendations for enhancing the diversity of samples within future digital health interventions. METHODS A rapid review methodology informed by Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review guidelines was conducted. A search for peer-reviewed literature published between (2010-2021) on digital health solutions that support hospital to home transitions for older adults was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. The Sex-and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+) lens theoretically guided the study design, analysis and interpretation. RESULTS 34 papers met inclusion criteria. Our findings indicate that many groups of older adults were excluded from these interventions and remain understudied. Specifically, the “oldest old” and those living with cognitive impairments were excluded from studies included in this review. In addition, very few studies described characteristics related to gender diversity, education, race, ethnicity and culture. No study commented on the sexual orientation of participants. CONCLUSIONS This is the first review, to our knowledge, that has mapped the literature focusing on the inclusion of older adults in digital hospital to home interventions. Findings suggest that the literature on digital health interventions tends to operationalize older adults as a homogenous group, ignoring the heterogeneity in older age definitions. Inconsistency in the literature surrounding the characteristics of included participants suggests a need for further study to understand better how digital technologies to support hospital to home transitions can be inclusive. CLINICALTRIAL N/A

Designing the Ideal Patient Navigation Program for Older Adults with Complex Needs: A Qualitative Exploration of the Preferences of Key Informants

Navigating the healthcare system is complex. Many older adults and their family members report sub-optimal outcomes when transitioning from hospital to home. Patient navigation has been introduced as a model of care to help improve hospital to home transitions and to better integrate care across care environments. There are no best-practice guidelines for designing a patient navigation program for older adults with complex needs. This qualitative descriptive study interviewed 38 healthcare professionals to determine key characteristics of the “ideal” patient navigator program. Thematic analysis revealed four themes describing key components of an ideal patient navigator program for older adults with complex needs: (1) Easy accessibility and open communication amongst staff; (2) flexible eligibility requirements; (3) characteristics of the patient navigator; and (4) appropriate program size and duration. We suggest directions for future research, program design, and implementation considers to improve patient navigation for older adults and their family caregivers.

Parents' Experiences Caring for a Child after a Critical Illness: A Qualitative Study

Objectives This article described parents' experience and identifies outcomes important to parents following their child's critical illness. Methods Semistructured interviews with 22 female and 4 male parents representing 26 critically ill children with predominately neurologic and respiratory diagnoses. Most children were younger than 5 years at discharge with a median (interquartile range) of 2 (2.0–3.0) years from discharge to interview. Results Many children returned home with life-altering physical and cognitive disabilities requiring months to years of rehabilitation. Parents remembered feeling unprepared and facing an intense, chaotic time when the child first returned home. They described how they suddenly had to center their daily activities around the child's needs amidst competing needs of siblings and partners, and in some cases, the medicalization of the home. They recounted negotiating adjustments almost daily with insurance agencies, medical doctors and therapists, employers, the child, and other family members to keep the family functioning. In the long term, families developed a new norm, choosing to focus on what the child could still do rather than what they could not. Even if the child returned to baseline, parents remembered the adjustments made to keep the child alive and the family functioning. Conclusion Heightened awareness of family experiences after pediatric critical illness will allow health care providers to improve family preparedness for the transition from hospital to home.

Systems Barriers to Medication Management During Hospital to Home Transitions of Older Adults With Dementia

The hospital-to-home transition is a high-risk period for medication errors and adverse events for older adults living with dementia. Researchers conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews and participant solicited diaries. Caregivers of adults ages 55 and older were recruited to understand barriers to medication management during hospital to skilled home health care transitions. We used a human factors engineering approach to guide our understanding of systems level barriers. At least two researchers independently coded each transcript using content analysis and the ATLAS.ti software. We interviewed 23 caregivers and identified five barrier types stemming from systems breakdowns related to: (1) knowledge and information, (2) access to and use of resources and tools, (3) caregiver burden, (4) pandemic concerns, and (5) health limitations. Caregivers grappled with receiving overwhelming, insufficient, incorrect, or conflicting information, and had difficulty managing information from different sources. Latinx caregivers encountered language barriers that impeded role and task clarity. Caregivers expressed mistrust in health systems elements and inability to access resources. Caregivers were in need of additional caregiving assistance, financial aid, and tools to manage medications. Balancing multiple medications and responsibilities left caregivers burdened. The health limitations of the older adult and COVID-19 concerns related to reduced access to resources and ability to deliver and receive in person care complicated task management. Altogether these barriers reflect systems level breakdowns impeding task understanding, execution, and overall management. These findings will inform the development of interdisciplinary strategies to ensure safer care transitions.

Challenges and Strategies to Maintain Fidelity to the MIRROR-TCM Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that the multicomponent Transitional Care Model (TCM), an advanced practice registered nurse-led, team-based, care management strategy improves outcomes for older adults transitioning from hospital to home. However, healthcare systems’ adoption of the model has been limited. A multi-system, replication RCT (MIRROR-TCM) enrolling older adults hospitalized with heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia began in February 2020 just as the outbreak of COVID-19 in the U.S. dramatically changed the healthcare and research landscape. The goal of this qualitative descriptive study is to explore the impact of COVID-19 on fidelity to the TCM intervention during this clinical trial. Using directed content analysis, recorded monthly meetings with health system leaders and staff were coded to identify challenges and strategies to maintaining fidelity to the intervention in the context of the pandemic. Analyses showed that COVID-19 impacted all 10 TCM components. The components with the most challenges were delivering services from hospital-to-home due to quarantining, restrictive facility policies, lack of personal protective equipment and limited telehealth availability; coordinating care due reduced availability of services, and screening at risk individuals because of fewer eligible patients. Strategies for addressing challenges included: exploring alternatives (e.g., increasing reliance on telehealth, expanding study eligibility), building and engaging networks (e.g., direct outreach to skilled nursing facility staff) and anticipating needs (e.g., preparing for shorter hospital stays). Findings highlight the importance of monitoring the contextual challenges to implementing an evidence-based intervention and actively engaging partners in identifying strategies to achieve fidelity.

Effectiveness of Transitional Care from Hospital to Home in Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review

Frail older adults are at high risk of negative consequences from hospitalization and are discharged without completely returning to their pre-existing health status. Transitional care is needed to maintain care continuity from hospital to home. This systematic review aimed to examine transitional care for frail older adults and its effectiveness. The Cochrane guidelines were followed, and search terms were determined by PICO: (P) frail older adults, not disease-specified; (I) transitional care initiated before discharge; (C) usual care; and (O) all health outcomes. Four databases were searched for English-written randomized controlled trials (inception to 2020), and eight trials were ultimately included. Frail older adults in eight trials (1996–2019) totaled 2,785, with a mean sample size of 310. The intervention components varied from hospital care (e.g., geriatric assessment, discharge planning, rehabilitation) to follow-up care after discharge (e.g., home visit, phone follow-up, community service). Most measured outcomes were readmission (n = 7), function (n = 4), quality of life (n = 4), self-rated health (n = 3), and mortality (n = 3). Statistical significance was reported in the following number of trials: readmission (n = 2), function (n = 2), quality of life (n = 1), self-rated health (n = 3), and mortality (n = 0). The effectiveness of the intervention on each outcome was inconsistent across the trials. Varied transitional care between hospital and home was implemented to improve health status; however, its effectiveness was controversial. A novel, yet evidence-based approach is needed to develop transitional care interventions for these vulnerable populations.