progressive sanctification
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Erikasari ◽  
Atalia Agustin ◽  
Dylmoon Hidayat

<p>Reflective learning is one of the actions in which the teacher observes the shortcomings that occur in the classroom. Reflective learning aims to find solutions to every problem that arises when the teacher teaches, so that class management runs well. This reflection process consists of 4 stages: concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. The focus of the study in this paper is on Christian education, Christian teachers, students, reflective learning, and classroom management. The method used is analysis based on literature study. Reflective learning practices that rely on the Holy Spirit in the progressive sanctification process to become like God in responding to each student's behavior according to the principles of the Christian faith. Reflective learning is important to be applied in the classroom, because through reflective learning the teacher will be more sensitive to problems in the classroom. Based on the results of this study, it can be said that the difficulties experienced by the author during the reflection process; first, student teachers do not see the importance of assertiveness in leading the class. Second, do not give a firm attitude during the learning process. Third, student teachers are not consistent in carrying out discipline in the classroom. It is recommended that in the implementation of reflective learning, teachers need to have sufficient experience and competence, and need to carry out a complete reflective learning cycle to complete the completion of overcoming the class.</p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA ABSTRACT: </strong>Pembelajaran reflektif adalah salah satu tindakan dimana guru melakukann observasi, terhadap kekurangan yang terjadi dalam kelas. Pembelajaran reflektif bertujuan untuk menemukan solusi untuk setiap permasalahan yang muncul saat guru mengajar, sehingga manajemen kelas berjalan dengan baik. Proses refleksi ini terdiri dari 4 tahap: <em>concrete experience</em><em>, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, </em>dan<em> active experiment</em><em>.</em> Fokus kajian dalam paper ini mengenai pendidikan Kristen, guru Kristen, siswa, pembelajaran reflektif, dan manajemen kelas. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis berdasarkan studi literature. Praktik pembelajaran reflektif yang mengandalkan Roh Kudus dalam proses <em>progressive sanctification</em> untuk menjadi semakin serupa dengan Allah dalam merespons setiap perilaku siswa sesuai prinsip iman Kriten. Pembelajaran reflektif penting untuk diterapkan dalam kelas, karena melalui pembelajaran reflektif guru akan semakin peka dengan permasalahan dalam kelas. Berdasakan hasil dari penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa kesulitan yang dialami penulis selama proses refleksi; pertama, mahasiswa guru tidak memandang penting sikap tegas dalam memimpin kelas. Kedua, tidak memberikan sikap tegas selama proses belajar. Ketiga, mahasiswa guru tidak konsisten adalam menjalankan sikap disiplin dalam kelas. Disarankan dalam pelaksanaan pembelarajan reflektif guru perlu memiliki pengalaman dan kompetensi yang cukup, serta perlu melakukan siklus pembelajaran reflektif secara utuh untuk memberikan penyelesaian dalam mengatasi kelas.</p>


Kurios ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Nurnilam Sarumaha

One of God's will in human life is to live in holiness, even though it is not an easy thing to maintain a holy life perfectly. However, holiness can be progressive. This study aims to show the importance of progressive sanctification of believers. By using a descriptive method of analysis of the biblical text, especially 1 John 1: 9, it can be concluded that believers must progressively sanctify. Sanctification is progressively a reflection of the growth of the Christian faith toward maturity.AbstrakSalah satu kehendak Tuhan dalam hidup manusia adalah hidup di dalam kekudusan, sekalipun bukanlah hal yang mudah mempertahankan hidup yang kudus secara sempurna. Namun demikian, kekudusan itu dapat bersifat progresif. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menunjukkan pentingnya pengudusan secara progresif orang percaya. Dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis terhadap teks Alkitab, khususnya 1 Yohanes 1:9, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa orang percaya harus mengalami pengudusan secara progresif. Pengudusan secara progresif merupakan refleksi pertumbuhan iman Kristen menuju kedewasaan.


Kairos ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-43
Author(s):  
Miroslav Balint-Feudvarski

Throughout the New Testament, we find exhortations to imitate or follow in the steps of Christ, Paul and even some other godly people. In the Epistle to the Philippians, we find this exhortation to imitate incorporated into a Pauline theology of progressive sanctification. Sanctification in Philippians is portrayed as a conforming to Christ through the knowledge of Him, which comes through tripartite means of the Word of God (the Apostolic teaching), the internal work of God’s Spirit and the imitation of Christ, the Apostle Paul and other godly examples. We will aim at forming a biblical theology of sanctification through imitation restricted in our analysis to the Epistle of Philippians. First part of the article reviews the teaching of sanctification in Philippians, with an emphasis on passages where Paul directly addresses this issue: Philippians 1:9-11, 27-29; 2:12-16; 3:1-15. Second part of the article introduces us to biblical teaching on imitation, and then it reviews a downward spiral of imitation: imitating Christ (Phil. 2:5), imitating Paul (Phil. 3:17a; 4:9) and imitating Paul’s faithful imitators (Phil. 3:17b). In the conclusion, we will see that imitation of Christ and His faithful imitators is a means of progressive sanctification that is both important and often neglected, both by those who should serve as primary examples of godliness (spiritual leaders) and those who need to learn by imitating.


2017 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-221
Author(s):  
T. Michael Christ

There is broad agreement among Calvin scholars that the Genevan Reformer recognized justification and sanctification as distinct and inseparable salvific benefits. Yet scholars disagree concerning the precise structure Calvin used to maintain the benefits’ distinction and inseparability. Is justification the cause of union and sanctification or do both graces obtain with equal priority because both are grounded in union with Christ? This article suggests a nuanced reading of Calvin, which distinguishes between definitive and progressive sanctification. With respect to Calvin’s architectonic structure, justification and definitive sanctification enjoy equal priority, as both depend immediately upon union with Christ. But with respect to progressive sanctification, justification enjoys a relative priority. It is hoped that this reading of Calvin satisfies the concerns of both sides, leading to a more accurate and versatile formulation of the Reformer’s soteriology.


Author(s):  
Carter Lindberg

Pietism, the major Protestant renewal movement in the 17th and 18th centuries, sought to bring the head into the heart, to recover an experiential-expressive faith, to continue Luther’s reform of doctrine with reform of Christian living, to complete justification by sanctification. Hence Pietism understood itself as “the Second Reformation,” as the “church always reforming.” The leading figures of Lutheran Pietism understood themselves as true followers of Luther. Johann Arndt’s True Christianity (1605–1610), one of the most influential writings of early modern Protestantism, appealed to the young Luther’s esteem for late medieval mysticism, and emphasized Christian religious experience. Philipp Jakob Spener, “the Father of Pietism,” wrote the programmatic tract for Lutheran Pietism, Pious Desires (1675), as a “foreword” to a collection of Arndt’s sermons. Spener, who had extensive knowledge of Luther’s writings, called for improved pastoral formation and increased lay participation in the church (priesthood of all believers) through gatherings for prayer and Bible study (collegia pietatis). He supported his program by appeal to Luther’s emphasis upon living, active faith in Luther’s “Preface to Romans” and “Preface to the German Mass.” Unlike “radical Pietists,” who despairing of renewal separated from the established church, Spener was convinced that God would provide “better times” for the church as it was renewed from within (the ecclesiola in ecclesia). Spener’s call for spiritual and ethical renewal, praxis pietatis, was sharpened by his follower, August Hermann Francke. Francke’s struggles with doubts of God led to his conversion experience in 1687, his so-called Busskampf, experienced as a rebirth. From this Francke introduced into Pietism the concern for a once-for-all datable conversion or rebirth that would initiate a life of progressive sanctification. Francke’s new emphasis upon progressive sanctification toward perfection departed significantly from Luther’s dialectical theology, which understood the Christian as sinner and righteous as the same time (simul iustus et peccator). On the other hand, Francke continued Luther’s emphasis upon the Bible and strove to make the Bible as accessible as possible to the laity. A professor of biblical languages at the new University of Halle, Francke corrected the Luther translation through his own highly skilled historical-philological exegesis and in the process influenced succeeding generations of biblical scholars. A third-generation Pietist leader, Nicholas Ludwig von Zinzendorf, one of Francke’s students at the University of Halle, created a vibrant Pietist community on his estate when he welcomed Protestant refugees from Moravia in 1722. Although not a trained theologian like his predecessors Spener and Francke, Zinzendorf followed the Lutheran emphasis upon atonement as the basis for justification before God. He supplemented Luther’s theology of the cross with his experiential “heart-religion” (Herzensreligion); Christians must have Christ in their hearts, not just their heads. Lutheran Pietists used Luther selectively to advance their understanding of the practice of piety.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Kim-van Daalen

This paper seeks to demonstrate how the Holy Spirit, through common grace, may be actively working and using secular psychotherapy in light of the dual reality of belief and unbelief in this world. The Triune God desires to bring a world fallen in sin to his desired goal of reconciliation with Him through the redemptive work of Christ. The Holy Spirit works through common grace in order to help people experience the goodness of God to draw them to him. As such the Holy Spirit may work through secular psychotherapy to bless people in general, restrain sin in this world, prepare for salvation, or aid in the progressive sanctification of believers. The Holy Spirit's activity through secular psychotherapy entails for Christian counselors and scholars a challenging call to engage wisely with secular psychotherapy in order to bless humankind, to be a witness, and to use potential blessings for the sake of distinctly Christian psychotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document