fixed income markets
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

69
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 0)

FEDS Notes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (2948) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark E. Paddrik ◽  
◽  
Carlos A. Ramírez ◽  
Matthew J. McCormick ◽  
◽  
...  

The overnight segment of the triparty repurchase agreement (repo) market plays a pivotal role in the normal functioning of the U.S. financial system by acting as an important source of secured short-term funding and supporting the liquidity of key fixed income markets, including U.S. Treasury and agency securities. This over-the-counter market accounts for over $1 trillion in daily transactions and provides a unique venue in which a diverse set of market participants invest their cash as well as obtain short-term funding.


2020 ◽  
Vol 287 (2) ◽  
pp. 712-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Contessi ◽  
Pierangelo De Pace ◽  
Massimo Guidolin

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-552
Author(s):  
Jean‐Sébastien Fontaine ◽  
Guillaume Nolin

2019 ◽  
Vol 2017 (324) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvio Contessi ◽  
◽  
Pierangelo De Pace ◽  
Massimo Guidolin ◽  
◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (50) ◽  
pp. 5498-5514
Author(s):  
Ben Van Vliet ◽  
Apostolos Xanthopoulos

2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendrik Bessembinder ◽  
Chester Spatt ◽  
Kumar Venkataraman

In this article, we survey the literature that studies fixed-income trading rules and outcomes, including Treasury securities, corporate and municipal bonds, and structured credit products. We compare and contrast the microstructure and regulation of fixed-income markets with equity markets. We highlight the nature of over-the-counter trading in the face of search costs and the associated slow evolution of electronically facilitated intermediation. We discuss the databases available to study fixed-income microstructure, as well as measures and determinants of trading costs, and the important roles dealer networks and limited transparency play. We also highlight unresolved issues.


For sponsors of defined benefit (“DB”) plans considering plan termination, analysis of the pros and cons of filing an Application for Determination Upon Termination with the IRS should encompass the financial and legal implications, including tradeoffs related to “legal certainty,” in particular. Such tradeoffs are the result of the IRS’s Favorable Determination on such an Application against potential, intervening financial risks related to fluctuations in credit/fixed income markets, as well as market performance of a DB plan’s underlying assets.


Risks ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Garrido ◽  
Ramin Okhrati

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document