cluster immunotherapy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

16
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Elena Rodríguez Plata ◽  
Guacimara L. Hernández Santana ◽  
Estefanía Cubas Mesa ◽  
Kevin Coello Valeriano ◽  
María Matas Ros ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 014556131986337
Author(s):  
Jieqing Yu ◽  
Nongping Zhong ◽  
Qing Luo ◽  
Yuanhua Liu ◽  
Huarong Yi ◽  
...  

Background: Specific immunotherapy is an important immune-modifying treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). We compared the early efficacy and safety of cluster and conventional immunotherapies for patients with AR. Methods: One hundred forty-nine patients with persistent AR were enrolled in a randomized and open-label trial and were divided into the following 4 groups: 60 children treated conventionally, 33 children treated using the cluster schedule, 23 adults treated conventionally, and 33 adults treated using the cluster schedule. Patients in the cluster groups reached the maintenance dose within 6 weeks, while those receiving conventional therapy reached the maintenance dose within 14 weeks. Symptom scores and skin prick test scores (SPTs) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy and adverse reactions. Results: After buildup phase of treatment, symptom scores, and SPTs were significantly lower than those prior to treatment in each group ( P < .05). No significant differences were found in the efficacy of nasal symptoms scores among four groups ( P > .05).However, the efficacy of SPTs using conventional schedule was higher than cluster schedule in children groups (group A and B, 57.7 vs 30.2%, P = .001). Besides, the efficacy of SPTs in adults was higher than children when using the cluster treatment (group D and B, 53.0 vs 30.2%, P = .008). No severe adverse reaction occurred. Conclusions: Conventional and cluster immunotherapy schedules have similar efficacies, which do not vary with age; both schedules are safe and reliable. Also, SPT facilitate evaluation of clinical efficacy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. ar.2017.8.0207
Author(s):  
Mai Aly Gharib Aly ◽  
Mohamed Tawfik El Tabbakh ◽  
Waheed Fawzy Heissam ◽  
Said Hamed Abbadi

Introduction Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common allergic diseases, which affects ~20% of the world's population. T-helper (Th) type 2 cells produce interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-13, and mediate allergic responses, and these cytokines have been extensively studied as key players in the atopic airway diseases. However, the involvement of Th17 cells and IL-17 in AR has not been clearly examined. Aim To reevaluate AR clinical severity with serum IL-17, whether IL-17 affects the disease alone or in contribution with the atopic predisposition. Patients and Methods During an 18-month period, 39 individuals were divided into three groups: A, (13 control), B (13 with mild-to-moderate AR), and C (13 with severe AR). Both group B and group C patients (26) were subjected to clinical examination and allergy skin testing, and to measurement of both total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) and IL-17 levels. Eleven patients with AR then were exposed to 6 months of cluster immunotherapy, whereas the rest of the patients were not exposed. Results Revealed a significant elevation of serum IL-17 levels with an associated increase in serum IgE in the patients with AR compared with controls and revealed that the serum levels of both total serum IgE and IL-17 decreased significantly after cluster immunotherapy. Conclusion These preliminary results added new data about the use of injective immunotherapy as well as reported on the use of sublingual immunotherapy.


2015 ◽  
Vol 135 (2) ◽  
pp. AB214
Author(s):  
Roy A. Orden ◽  
Dea M. Cunningham ◽  
Jody R. Tversky

2011 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 441-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C. Copenhaver ◽  
Anne Parker ◽  
Steven Patch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document