brahma complex
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. ji2001320
Author(s):  
Susanna Valanne ◽  
Mirva Järvelä-Stölting ◽  
Sanna-Kaisa E. Harjula ◽  
Henna Myllymäki ◽  
Tiina S. Salminen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 204 (8) ◽  
pp. 2143-2155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanna Valanne ◽  
Mirva Järvelä-Stölting ◽  
Sanna-Kaisa E. Harjula ◽  
Henna Myllymäki ◽  
Tiina S. Salminen ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Pillidge ◽  
Sarah J Bray

AbstractNotch signaling plays a key role in many cell fate decisions during development by directing different gene expression programs via the transcription factor CSL, known as Su(H) in Drosophila. Which target genes are responsive to Notch signaling is influenced by the chromatin state of enhancers, yet how this is regulated is not fully known. Detecting an increase in the histone variant H3.3 in response to Notch signaling, we tested which chromatin remodelers or histone chaperones were required for the changes in enhancer accessibility to Su(H) binding. This revealed a crucial role for the Brahma SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex in conferring enhancer accessibility and enabling the transcriptional response. The Notch-responsive regions had high levels of nucleosome turnover which were dependent on the Brahma complex, increased with Notch signaling and primarily involved histone H3.3. Together these results highlight the importance of SWI/SNF-mediated nucleosome turnover in rendering enhancers responsive to Notch.


2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 9730-9739 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiejun Shi ◽  
Meizhu Zheng ◽  
Youqiong Ye ◽  
Min Li ◽  
Xiaolong Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes regulate nucleosome organizations. In Drosophila, gene Brm encodes the core Brahma complex, the ATPase subunit of SWI/SNF class of chromatin remodelers. Its role in modulating the nucleosome landscape in vivo is unclear. In this study, we knocked down Brm in Drosophila third instar larvae to explore the changes in nucleosome profiles and global gene transcription. The results show that Brm knockdown leads to nucleosome occupancy changes throughout the entire genome with a bias in occupancy decrease. In contrast, the knockdown has limited impacts on nucleosome position shift. The knockdown also alters another important physical property of nucleosome positioning, fuzziness. Nucleosome position shift, gain or loss and fuzziness changes are all enriched in promoter regions. Nucleosome arrays around the 5′ ends of genes are reorganized in five patterns as a result of Brm knockdown. Intriguingly, the concomitant changes in the genes adjacent to the Brahma-dependent remodeling regions have important roles in development and morphogenesis. Further analyses reveal abundance of AT-rich motifs for transcription factors in the remodeling regions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Huen ◽  
Yoshito Kakihara ◽  
Francisca Ugwu ◽  
Kevin L. Y. Cheung ◽  
Joaquin Ortega ◽  
...  

Rvb1 and Rvb2 are highly conserved, essential AAA+ helicases found in a wide range of eukaryotes. The versatility of these helicases and their central role in the biology of the cell is evident from their involvement in a wide array of critical cellular complexes. Rvb1 and Rvb2 are components of the chromatin-remodeling complexes INO80, Swr-C, and BAF. They are also members of the histone acetyltransferase Tip60 complex, and the recently identified R2TP complex present in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiens; a complex that is involved in small nucleolar ribonucleoprotein (snoRNP) assembly. Furthermore, in humans, Rvb1 and Rvb2 have been identified in the URI prefoldin-like complex. In Drosophila, the Polycomb Repressive complex 1 contains Rvb2, but not Rvb1, and the Brahma complex contains Rvb1 and not Rvb2. Both of these complexes are involved in the regulation of growth and development genes in Drosophila. Rvbs are therefore crucial factors in various cellular processes. Their importance in chromatin remodeling, transcription regulation, DNA damage repair, telomerase assembly, mitotic spindle formation, and snoRNP biogenesis is discussed in this review.


2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (17) ◽  
pp. 5238-5250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inés Carrera ◽  
Jiri Zavadil ◽  
Jessica E. Treisman

ABSTRACT Chromatin remodeling complexes control the availability of DNA binding sites to transcriptional regulators. Two distinct conserved forms of the SWI/SNF class of complexes are characterized by the presence of specific accessory subunits. In Drosophila, the core Brahma complex associates either with Osa to form the BAP complex or with Bap170 and Bap180 to form the PBAP complex. osa mutations reproduce only a subset of the developmental phenotypes caused by mutations in subunits of the core complex. To test whether the PBAP complex performs the remaining functions, we generated mutations in bap170 and bap180. Surprisingly, we found that Bap180 is not essential for viability, although it is required in ovarian follicle cells for normal eggshell development. Bap170 is necessary to stabilize the Bap180 protein, but a mutant form that retains this function is sufficient for both survival and fertility. The two subunits act redundantly to allow metamorphosis; using gene expression profiling of bap170 bap180 double mutants, we found that the PBAP complex regulates genes involved in tissue remodeling and immune system function. Finally, we generated mutants lacking Bap170, Bap180, and Osa in the germ line to demonstrate that the core Brahma complex can function in oogenesis without any of these accessory subunits.


2005 ◽  
Vol 352 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Möller ◽  
Frank W. Avila ◽  
James W. Erickson ◽  
Herbert Jäckle

2002 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 3377-3389 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Brumby
Keyword(s):  
Cyclin E ◽  

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 1058-1071 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnoud J. Kal ◽  
Tokameh Mahmoudi ◽  
Naomi B. Zak ◽  
C. Peter Verrijzer

The trithorax group (trxG) of activators andPolycomb group (PcG) of repressors are believed to control the expression of several key developmental regulators by changing the structure of chromatin. Here, we have sought to dissect the requirements for transcriptional activation by the DrosophilatrxG protein Zeste, a DNA-binding activator of homeotic genes. Reconstituted transcription reactions established that the Brahma (BRM) chromatin-remodeling complex is essential for Zeste-directed activation on nucleosomal templates. Because it is not required for Zeste to bind to chromatin, the BRM complex appears to act after promoter binding by the activator. Purification of the Drosophila BRM complex revealed a number of novel subunits. We found that Zeste tethers the BRM complex via direct binding to specific subunits, including trxG proteins Moira (MOR) and OSA. The leucine zipper of Zeste mediates binding to MOR. Interestingly, although the Imitation Switch (ISWI) remodelers are potent nucleosome spacing factors, they are dispensable for transcriptional activation by Zeste. Thus, there is a distinction between general chromatin restructuring and transcriptional coactivation by remodelers. These results establish that different chromatin remodeling factors display distinct functional properties and provide novel insights into the mechanism of their targeting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document