humanizing pedagogy
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

24
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
pp. 156-179
Author(s):  
Suzanne García-Mateus ◽  
Kathryn I. Henderson ◽  
Mónica Téllez-Arsté ◽  
Deborah K. Palmer
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Ita Olszewska ◽  
Elizabeth Bondy ◽  
Natalie Hagler ◽  
Hyunjin Jinna Kim

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12
Author(s):  
Saleem Alhabash

In this invited commentary, I reflect on the philosophical changes to my pedagogical approach during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inspired by Mehta and Aguilera’s (2020) humanizing pedagogy approach, the commentary provides four elements to capitalize on when designing courses aspiring to inspire a brighter future in advertising.


Author(s):  
Kristie O'Donnell Lussier ◽  
Lori Czop Assaf ◽  
Meagan Hoff

The purpose of this study was to explore how preservice teachers (PST) became aware of literacies in global and local contexts and to understand how PST conceive of literacy after experiencing an international service learning (ISL) study abroad program in rural South Africa. For this qualitative grounded theory study, we used critical literacy and humanizing pedagogy as theoretical frames for designing the program and analyzing data. Findings show PST experienced a


2019 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386
Author(s):  
María E. Fránquiz ◽  
Alba A. Ortiz ◽  
Gilberto Lara
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-129
Author(s):  
Emily Rose Schwab

This article builds on the work of adult literacy scholars to explore how dialogue journals might be used to enact a mutually humanizing pedagogy within adult English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL) classrooms. The researcher extends the discussion of using dialogue journals to consider not only how they can be used to meet the ends of specific class and language learning goals but can be utilized by teachers and researchers as a humanizing practice in a context historically and contemporarily dominated by the dehumanizing of adult immigrants through popular and political discourse. Through a review of literature and data from a practitioner inquiry study, the researcher revisits research on dialogue journaling and offers a reclaiming of dialogue journals as a mutually humanizing practice, using the discussion to interrogate what humanizing practices look like in a contemporary adult ESOL classroom.


2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Dorinda J. Carter Andrews ◽  
Tashal Brown ◽  
Bernadette M. Castillo ◽  
Davena Jackson ◽  
Vivek Vellanki

Background/Context In our best efforts to increase preservice teachers’ critical consciousness regarding the historical and contemporary inequities in the P–12 educational system and equip them to embody pedagogies and practices that counter those inequities, teacher educators often provide curricular and field experiences that reinforce the deficit mindsets that students bring to the teacher education classroom. For many social justice-oriented teacher educators, our best intentions to create humanizing experiences for future teachers can have harmful results that negatively impact preservice teachers’ ability to successfully teach culturally diverse students in a multitude of learning contexts. Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study In this article, we propose a humanizing pedagogy for teacher education that is informed by our experiences as K–12 teachers and teacher educators in a university-based teacher preparation program. We focus on the general questions, How can university-based teacher preparation programs embody and enact a humanizing pedagogy? and What role can curriculum play in advancing a humanizing pedagogy in university-based teacher preparation programs? Research Design In this conceptual article, we theorize a humanizing pedagogy for teacher education and propose a process of becoming asset-, equity-, and social justice-oriented teachers. This humanizing pedagogy represents a strengths-based approach to teaching and learning in the teacher preparation classroom. Conclusions/Recommendations We propose core tenets of a humanizing pedagogy for teacher education that represent an individual and collective effort toward critical consciousness for preservice teachers and also for teacher educators. If university-based teacher education programs are committed to cultivating the development of asset-, equity-, and social justice-oriented preservice teachers, the commitments to critical self-reflection, resisting binaries, and enacting ontological and epistemological plurality need to be foundational to program structure, curricula alignment, and instructional practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document