Psychosomatic Approach to Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Concept, Diagnosis and Treatment

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) has chronic widespread pain (CWP) as a core symptom and a variety of associated somatic and psychological symptoms such as fatigue, sleep problems, cognitive disturbances, multiple somatic pain, and depression. FMS is the subject of considerable controversy in the realm of nosology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment.Moreover, the fact that FMS and mental illness are closely associated with each other might intensify the confusion for the distinction between FMS and mental disorders. This narrative literature review aims to provide the concept, diagnosis, and treatment of FMS from the integrative biopsychosocial and psychosomatic perspective. This article first explains the concepts of FMS as a disease entity of biopsychosocial model, and then summarizes the changes of diagnostic criteria over past three decades, differential diagnosis and comorbidity issue focused on mental illnesses. In addition, an overview of treatment of FMS is presented mainly by arranging the recommendations from the international guidelines which have been developed by four official academic associations.

Study of Correction of Somatic Pain under the Conditions of Experimental Pathology of Multiple Sclerosis

The purpose of the study was to experimentally substantiate the ways of pharmacological correction of somatic pain syndrome in conditions of the experimental equivalent of multiple sclerosis through a comparative system analysis and the use of complex methodological approaches. Materials and methods. To study multiple sclerosis, we used an experimental model with autoimmune mechanisms of inflammatory demyelination – a model of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. To assess the antinociceptive activity of painkillers, we used the method of electrical stimulation of the rats’ tail root. The activity of the enzyme prostaglandin H-synthetase was also determined. Results and discussion. A comparative analysis of the analgesic activity indicators of combinations of methylprednisolone with analgesics under the condition of the formed experimental allergic encephalomyelitis showed that their antinociceptive potential (taking into account the basic therapy with methylprednisolone) decreased in the series meloxicam > lornoxicam ≈ ketorolac ≈ paracetamol > celecofenacoxib ≈ sodium diclofupene ≈ diclofupene ≈ diclofupene. Accordingly, the maximum effect on the threshold of nociception under these experimental conditions was exerted by meloxicam and lornoxicam. The combined administration of methylprednisolone with diclofenac sodium, celecoxib and meloxicam reduced the activity of prostaglandin N-synthetase in the brain structures by 49.8% (p <0.05), 50.4% (p <0.05) and 51% (p <0.05), respectively, compared with the indicators of the control group. The same drugs markedly reduced the activity of prostaglandin N-synthetase in the spinal cord by 23.9% (p <0.05) (Methylprednisolone + diclofenac), by 34% (p <0.05) (Methylprednisolone + celecoxib) and by 47.4% (p <0.05) (Methylprednisolone + meloxicam) compared with the control group. Our analysis of the analgesic activity of antidepressants and anticonvulsants as means of correcting nociceptive pain in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis found that their antinociceptive potential was inferior to the severity of the analgesic effect of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Conclusion. Among the studied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants and anticonvulsants, the maximum therapeutic efficacy as a means of correcting nociceptive pain in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis against the background of basic methylprednisolone therapy was shown by meloxicam, which gives grounds to recommend it as the analgesic of choice for eliminating somatic pain syndromes

Comparative Study between Bupivacaine-Dexmedetomidine versus Bupivacaine-Dexamethasone in Skin Infiltration as Post-Operative Analgesia for Patients undergoing Abdominoplasty Surgeries

Background Poorly controlled acute pain after abdominal surgery is related to somatic pain signals derived from the abdominal wall and is associated with a variety of unwanted postoperative consequences, including patient suffering, distress, respiratory complications, delirium, myocardial ischemia, prolonged hospital stay, an increased likelihood of chronic pain, increased consumption of analgesics, delayed bowel function and increase the requirement for rescue analgesics. Appropriate pain treatment protocols to reduce postoperative morbidity, improve the results of the surgery and decrease hospital costs. Aim of the Work To compare skin infiltration with bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine mixture versus bupivacaine-dexamethasone mixture for analgesia in abdominoplasty under general anesthesia. Patients and Methods A prospective randomized clinical trial study was conducted in Ain Shams university hospital on 40 adult patients undergoing Abdominoplasty surgeries. The patients were randomly divided into two groups using their computer-generated random numbers will be enrolled in group I for bupivacaine-dexmedetomidine and group II for bupivacaine-dexamethasone. Results This study demonstrated that the addition of dexmedetomidine to wound infiltration with local anesthetics improves postoperative pain and reduces the need for analgesics. Conclusion Wound infiltration with bupivacaine -dexmedetomidine mixture provides prolonged local anesthetic effect, decreases the need for rescue analgesics, and provides better sedation than bupivacaine–dexamethasone mixture in patients undergoing Abdominoplasty surgeries.

“Prevalence of chronic pain following resection of pelvic bone tumours: A single centre prospective observational survey”

Background Hemipelvectomy is a major surgery most often performed for pelvic malignancy. These complex surgeries often involve dissection around major neurovascular bundle and resection of tumour being bone along with involved tissues. This may result in short and long term morbidities. There is very little literature about incidence of chronic pain after pelvic resections. We conducted a prospective study at a tertiary cancer hospital to assess the prevalence of chronic pain post hemipelvectomy. Method This is a single centre prospective observational study conducted over 30 months. Pain scores were recorded using Brief pain inventory (BPI) and pain detect questionnaire. The quality of life was assessed using musculoskeletal tumour society (MSTS) score. Intra-operative details like extent of surgical resection, nerves spared, details of intra-operative and post-operative analgesia were retrieved from the patient files. Data were analysed using SPSS 21 version. Results Neuropathic pain post hemipelvectomy was uncommon. The prevalence of mild to moderate somatic pain was around 30%. Functional limitation was minimal as assessed by BPI and MSTS score. A high incidence of numbness was seen to persist in and around the area of surgical incision (50%). Conclusion This is first study to report the incidence of chronic pain post hemipelvectomy done for pelvic tumour resections. Despite the extensive nature of resection involved, there is a low prevalence of neuropathic pain in this population. However, incidence of persistent somatic pain is high and there is a need for further studies for evaluating the causality

Central and Peripheral Nervous System

The neuronal, chemical, and electrical transmission of pain is a complex and intricate subject that continues to be studied and expounded. This review discusses the relevant physiology and influential factors contributing to the experience and subjective variation in a variety of acute and chronic pain presentations. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 30 references Keywords: acute pain, chronic pain, somatic pain, neuropathic pain, visceral pain, nociception, pain perception, gender-related pain, cancer pain, spine pain

Paragastric, lesser omentum neural block to prevent early visceral pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized clinical trial protocol

The somatic pain induced by surgical trauma to the abdominal wall after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is effectively managed using conventional analgesia and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks. In contrast, the visceral, colicky, pain that patients experience after LSG does not respond well to traditional pain management. Patients typically experience epigastric and retrosternal pain that begin immediately after LSG and lasts up to 72 hours after LSG. This visceral type of pain has been ascribed to the spasm of the neo-gastric sleeve. The pain is often severe and requires opioid derivatives. Patients frequently have associated autonomic symptoms such as nausea, retching and vomiting. In the last 15 years at our institutions, we have used many analgesic strategies to manage this burdensome symptom in the more than 2000 LSG procedures we have performed, but none have been satisfactorily effective1,2.

Functional and Anatomical Characterization of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor Receptor Subtypes of the Rat Spinal Cord Involved in Somatic Pain Relief

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) orchestrates our body’s response to stressful stimuli. Pain is often stressful and counterbalanced by activation of CRF receptors along the nociceptive pathway, although the involvement of the CRF receptor subtypes 1 and/or 2 (CRF-R1 and CRF-R2, respectively) in CRF-induced analgesia remains controversial. Thus, the aim of the present study was to examine CRF-R1 and CRF-R2 expression within the spinal cord of rats with Freund’s complete adjuvant-induced unilateral inflammation of the hind paw using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, Western blot, radioligand binding, and immunofluorescence confocal analysis. Moreover, the antinociceptive effects of intrathecal (i.t.) CRF were measured by paw pressure algesiometer and their possible antagonism by selective antagonists for CRF-R1 and/or CRF-R2 as well as for opioid receptors. Our results demonstrated a preference for the expression of CRF-R2 over CRF-R1 mRNA, protein, binding sites and immunoreactivity in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord. Consistently, CRF as well as CRF-R2 agonists elicited potent dose-dependent antinociceptive effects which were antagonized by the i.t. CRF-R2 selective antagonist K41498, but not by the CRF-R1 selective antagonist NBI35965. In addition, i.t. applied opioid antagonist naloxone dose-dependently abolished the i.t. CRF- as well as CRF-R2 agonist-elicited inhibition of somatic pain. Importantly, double immunofluorescence confocal microscopy of the spinal dorsal horn showed CRF-R2 on enkephalin (ENK)-containing inhibitory interneurons in close opposition of incoming mu-opioid receptor-immunoreactive nociceptive neurons. CRF-R2 was, however, not seen on pre- or on postsynaptic sensory neurons of the spinal cord. Taken together, these findings suggest that i.t. CRF or CRF-R2 agonists inhibit somatic inflammatory pain predominantly through CRF-R2 receptors located on spinal enkephalinergic inhibitory interneurons which finally results in endogenous opioid-mediated pain inhibition.

Visceral versus somatic pain: an educational review of anatomy and clinical implications

Somatic and visceral nociceptive signals travel via different pathways to reach the spinal cord. Additionally, signals regulating visceral blood flow and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) motility travel via efferent sympathetic nerves. To offer optimal pain relief and increase GIT motility and blood flow, we should interfere with all these pathways. These include the afferent nerves that travel with the sympathetic trunks, the somatic fibers that innervate the abdominal wall and part of the parietal peritoneum, and the sympathetic efferent fibers. All somatic and visceral afferent neural and sympathetic efferent pathways are effectively blocked by appropriately placed segmental thoracic epidural blocks (TEBs), whereas well-placed truncal fascial plane blocks evidently do not consistently block the afferent visceral neural pathways nor the sympathetic efferent nerves. It is generally accepted that it would be beneficial to counter the effects of the stress response on the GIT, therefore most enhanced recovery after surgery protocols involve TEB. The TEB failure rate, however, can be high, enticing practitioners to resort to truncal fascial plane blocks. In this educational article, we discuss the differences between visceral and somatic pain, their management and the clinical implications of these differences.