Assessing Baseline Proficiency of National Guard Combat Medics Due for Recertification: A Pilot Study

ABSTRACT Introduction Combat medics, or 68W Healthcare Specialists in the Army, are an early part of a combat casualty’s chain of survival. Their job requires a high degree of competency in emergency medical guidelines established by the Committee of Tactical Combat Casualty Care (CoTCCC) as well as basic bleeding control skills. The American Warfighting Experience for the last two decades highlights just how important these skills are in preventing death on the battlefield. A recent Government Office of Accountability suggests sustainment for critical wartime skills is lacking. This is especially concerning for National Guard Soldiers who must juggle their military obligations with their civilian ones. It is unknown how well-prepared National Guard combat medics are in fulfilling their most critical combat care responsibilities. The current study attempts to address this gap in knowledge by assessing National Guard Soldiers due for their annual recertification. Materials and Methods Nine medics due for their annual recertification were recruited for the study. First, they were given a questionnaire intended to gather basic demographic information about their experience and a six-question quiz on current CoTCCC guidelines. The medics were then evaluated on their ability to place a Combat Application Tourniquet on a live person, which was verified by a Doppler microphone. The medics were finally evaluated on their ability to pack a wound with a hemostatic dressing. Statistical analysis was used to determine if experience or frequency of practice over the previous year could predict success. Results Medics, on average, were only able to answer an average of 2.2 questions on the quiz correctly. The overall success rate for tourniquet application was 44.4%, and the overall success rate for wound packing was 22.2%. Statistical analysis showed that experience or frequency of practice could not adequately explain the success rates. Conclusions A soldier’s experience alone could not predict if the soldier will be successful in performing bleeding control tasks or if they will demonstrate higher levels of casualty care knowledge. Future research is needed in this area to better define recertification and refresher training issues.

Prehospital Emergency Cricothyrotomy in Dogs Part 1: Experiences With Commercial Cricothyrotomy Kits

The surgical cricothyrotomy (CTT) has been recommended for emergency front of neck airway access (eFONA) during a cannot intubate, cannot oxygenate scenario for military working dogs (MWD) and civilian law enforcement working dogs (operational K9s). In prehospital and austere environments, combat medics and emergency medical service providers are expected to administer emergency medical care to working dogs and may only have emergency airway kits designed for humans at their disposal. The objective of this article is to provide a detailed description of the application of such devices in cadaver dogs and highlight potential alterations to manufacturer guidelines required for successful tube placement. The kits evaluated included the Portex® PCK, Melker universal cricothyrotomy kit and H&H® emergency cricothyrotomy kit. A novel technique for awake cricothyrotomy in the dog is also described, which can also be considered for in-hospital use, together with the open surgical method described for the H&H® kit. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first publication documenting and providing instruction on the application of commercial cricothyrotomy kits in dogs.

Evaluation of the NIO and T.A.L.O.N Intraosseous Devices as Placed by U.S. Army Conventional Force Combat Medics—A Randomized Crossover Study

ABSTRACT Introduction In recent U.S. Military conflicts, hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable death with 30%-40% mortality rates. Management consists of effective bleeding control and rapid resuscitation with blood products. Rapid and accurate circulatory access is crucial in battlefield trauma management. This study evaluates the insertion success rate and time to successfully insert the NIO automatic intraosseous (IO) device and the Tactical Advanced Lifesaving IO Needle (TALON) manual IO device. The primary outcome is successful first attempt insertion. Secondary outcomes are the time taken for the successful insertion, user-reported “ease of use” for both devices, and user-reported device preference. Materials and Methods This is a prospective randomized crossover study comparing the NIO and TALON devices. As they are often the frontline health care providers, combat medics (68W) were recruited to participate in this study. They were randomized into two cohorts based on the IO device and location they would start first. Each medic performed a total of four IO cannulations on the proximal tibia and the humeral head of cadaveric human models. Results Sixty medics participated in the study, performing a total of 240 IO insertions, 120 with NIO (60 at the proximal tibia and 60 at the humeral head) and 120 with TALON (60 at the proximal tibia and 60 at the humeral head). The first attempt success rate was 89.2% for the NIO and 83.3% for the TALON, P = .19. The time to successful first attempt insertion for the NIO [M = 24.71 seconds, SD = 4.72] and the TALON, [M = 24.70 seconds, SD = 4.74] were similar, P = .98. The differences between the success of device insertion and time to successful insertion did not achieve statistical significance. The “ease of use” score (5-point Likert Scale) for the NIO [M = 4.73] and the TALON, [M = 4.11], demonstrated a significant difference, P < .001. Ninety percent [n = 54] of the combat medics preferred the NIO versus only 10% [n = 6] preferred TALON. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the overall insertion success rate and time to successful insertion were similar between NIO automatic IO device and the TALON manual IO device. In our study, Army combat medics learned how to use both devices rapidly but felt the NIO automatic IO device easier to use and overwhelmingly preferred this device.

Use of Augmented Reality to Train Sensemaking in High-Stakes Medical Environments

We present a framework for using augmented reality (AR) to train sensemaking skills in combat medics and civilian emergency medical personnel. AR and other extended reality technologies create engaging training environments, but their effectiveness on training outcomes is not yet clear. One benefit of AR is that it can enhance simulation training with realism and context that naturalistic decision-making (NDM) models emphasize. We describe four key elements of sensemaking that leverage the strengths of AR: perceptual skills, assessment skills, mental models, and generating/evaluating hypotheses. We discuss how AR can be used to train each of these four elements, along with design implications. A focus on naturalistic tasks and environments while designing AR-based simulation training will likely lead to training that is not only engaging but also effective.

Foundational Analysis to Support Simulation Training System Design

Simulation-based training systems should be tailored to the actual work environment of the envisioned audience of learners. After building an augmented reality-based training system for combat medics, we began to explore strategies for adapting the training to medical students. While people who provide medical care on the battlefield and people who practice medicine in a hospital need to know how to treat traumatic injuries, there are vast differences in how they are trained. Foundational research into the work environment has implications for training design, especially with regards to training content and delivery.

Airway Clearance Using Suction Devices in Prehospital Combat Casualty Care: A Systematic Review

Airway management is at the forefront for combat medics dealing with battlefield trauma. For military service members, compromised airways are the second leading cause of potentially survivable death on the battlefield, accounting for one in ten preventable combat deaths. Effective suction is a critical component of airway clearance. However, currently available devices are too heavy and bulky to be carried by combat medics and are insufficiently powered. The industry has not responded to the need, with companies continuing to produce models using 1970s technology. A literature review was completed with the assistance of a librarian. The databases searched included: Biomedical Research Database (BRD), Computer Retrieval of Information of Scientific Projects (CRISP), Federal Research in Progress (FEDRIP), Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC), Pub Med/Medline, and OVID. Additionally, a Google Scholar search was performed to identify nonstandard sources. After screening, a total of 40 articles were used. There were no randomized controlled trials or other high-quality evidence that addressed the issues; there was limited peer-reviewed literature on the use, effectiveness, adverse effects, and safety of suction for use in combat casualty care. A review of the available literature revealed no standards, either proposed, validated, or accepted, for the safety or avoidance of adverse effects for portable suction device use in combat casualty care. Similarly, there are no accepted standards to guide the safe use and anticipated adverse effects of suction for use in prehospital combat or emergency care. Nevertheless, there are meaningful data that can be extracted from the few studies available combined with non-clinical studies, narrative reviews and case reports, and expert opinions.

Remote training for combat medics during the COVID-19 era: lessons learnt for future crises?

BackgroundIn response to COVID-19, the UK government ordered strict social distancing measures. The UK Armed Forces followed these to protect the force and ensure readiness to respond to various tasking requests. Clinical training has adapted to ensure geographically dispersed medical personnel are trained while social distancing is maintained. This study aimed to evaluate remote training for Combat Medical Technicians, Medical Assistants and Royal Air Force Medics (CMTs/MAs/RAFMs) during the COVID-19 pandemic and the views of trainers on how this should be delivered now and in the future.MethodsA mixed quantitative and qualitative survey study was conducted to determine the experiences of a sample of Defence Medical Services personnel with remote training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical and nursing officers involved in teaching CMTs/MAs/RAFMs were eligible to participate.ResultsThere were 52 survey respondents. 78% delivered remote training to CMTs/MAs/RAFMs, predominantly using teleconferencing and small-group webinars. 70% of respondents report CMTs/MAs/RAFMs received more training during the COVID-19 pandemic than before. 94% of respondents felt webinar-based remote training should continue after COVID-19. The perceived benefits of webinar-based training included reduced travel time, more training continuity and greater clinical development of learners.ConclusionsThe challenge of continuing education of medical personnel while maintaining readiness for deployment and adhering to the Government’s social distancing measures was perceived to have been met within our study sample. This suggests that such an approach, along with clear training objectives and teleconferencing, may enable personnel to deliver high-quality training in an innovative and secure way.

Effects of MOPP Gear on SAM Medical Junctional Tourniquet Application: A Prospective, Randomized Control Trial

Introduction Hemorrhage is the leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield, and hemostasis is particularly challenging to achieve at junctional sites such as the axillary or inguinal regions. Mission-oriented protective posture (MOPP) gear, as worn most recently in Syria to guard against chemical weapons, can make the performance of technical skills more challenging still. The objective of this study was to evaluate how wearing MOPP gear affects the application time of the SAM Medical Junctional Tourniquet (SJT) by U.S. Army combat medics. Materials and Methods We conducted a prospective, randomized control trial evaluating time for SJT application between participants wearing MOPP versus those not wearing MOPP. Secondary outcomes included SJT application success rate and participant appraisal of SJT application difficulty assessed with five-point Likert items, between groups. Participants placed SJTs on robotic simulation mannequins with a penetrating inguinal injury. Results In April 2019, we enrolled 49 combat medics. Most participants were male (77.5%), had a median age of 25 (interquartile range 23–28), and in the grade of E4 or less (63.3%). Mean SJT application times in seconds were higher among those wearing MOPP versus those who were not (223.1 versus 167.2; 95% confidence interval for difference in means 5.293, 106.374; P = 0.03). Participants wearing MOPP had a less successful application rate overall, but this difference was not statistically significant (64.3% versus 81.0%, P = 0.34). Compared to participants not wearing MOPP, those wearing MOPP agreed that SJT application was difficult (4 versus 3, P = 0.03), what they were wearing affected SJT application (4 versus 2, P = 0.01), and it was difficult to use their hands during SJT application (4 versus 1, P < 0.001). Conclusions Wearing military MOPP gear significantly prolongs the amount of time required for combat medics to apply an SJT on a simulated casualty with a penetrating inguinal injury. This study highlights the importance of incorporating MOPP gear into medical training scenarios to improve skills competency while wearing these protective garments.

Impact of Succinct Training on Open Cricothyrotomy Performance: A Randomized, Prospective, Observational Study of U.S. Army First Responders

Introduction Primary airway failure has become the second most common cause of potentially survivable battlefield fatality. Cricothyrotomy is taught to all U.S. military providers as a means of securing an airway in extremis. However, retrospective studies show that cricothyrotomy failure rates for U.S. military first responders performing the procedure in combat is 33%. Our hypothesis was that these rates could be improved. Materials and Methods We conducted a randomized, prospective, observational study to evaluate the effects of inexpensive, succinct training on open cricothyrotomy performance by studying two unique U.S. Army First Responder participant groups. One participant group consisted of regular U.S. Army Medics (68 Ws). The second group was Special Operations Combat Medics. We evaluated both groups’ baseline ability to correctly perform a cricothyrotomy and then randomly assigned individuals within each group to either a training or practice group. Results The training group had a higher proportion of success and performed the cricothyrotomy faster than the practice group with 68 Ws group appearing to benefit most from training: their procedural success rates increased by an average of 23%, and their average time-to-correct-placement decreased by 21 seconds—a 33% improvement over baseline. Conclusion With one manikin, a qualified trainer, and $35 worth of expendable supplies, 10 medics could be trained in the procedure in just 2–3 hours. Our study suggests that this simple intervention has the potential to significantly improve U.S. Army First Responders’ ability to correctly perform an open cricothyrotomy and drastically decrease the time needed to perform this lifesaving procedure correctly, possibly saving one in four potentially survivable combat casualties suffering from airway compromise.