event response
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

66
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Megan C. Casey ◽  
Scott D. Stansberry ◽  
Christina M. Seidleck ◽  
Jeffrey A. Maharrey ◽  
Dante Gamboa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (9) ◽  
pp. 3698-3704
Author(s):  
Jiang Lu ◽  
Jiawei Liu ◽  
Xiaoli Tian ◽  
Hong Chen ◽  
Yidan Tang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Donald Elmazi ◽  
Miralda Cuka ◽  
Makoto Ikeda ◽  
Keita Matsuo ◽  
Leonard Barolli ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S241-S242
Author(s):  
Ney Alliey ◽  
Danielle Rubin ◽  
Huma Asif ◽  
Matt Hudgens-Haney ◽  
Brett A. Clementz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 95-118
Author(s):  
Christian Ritz ◽  
Signe Marie Jensen ◽  
Daniel Gerhard ◽  
Jens Carl Streibig

SAGE Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 215824401987105
Author(s):  
J. Pete Blair ◽  
M. Hunter Martaindale ◽  
William L. Sandel

Prior to the modern era of active shooter events, the standard training for patrol officers responding to an ongoing shooting event required the responding patrol officer(s) to contain the shooter in the building where the attack was occurring, control access to the location, attempt to communicate with the shooter, and call the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team. Recently, research has been undertaken to empirically examine different law enforcement response options. This article details one such experiment. The article details a tactic known as the peek. Utilizing an experimental design, we present findings regarding the peek room entry technique.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document