shape statistics
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

52
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (05) ◽  
pp. 061
Author(s):  
Zvonimir Vlah ◽  
Nora Elisa Chisari ◽  
Fabian Schmidt

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. e0224197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryam Hayati ◽  
Bita Shadgar ◽  
Leonid Chindelevitch

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1955-1967
Author(s):  
Sharmin Sultana ◽  
Praful Agrawal ◽  
Shireen Elhabian ◽  
Ross Whitaker ◽  
Jason E. Blatt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malte Thodberg ◽  
Axel Thieffry ◽  
Kristoffer Vitting-Seerup ◽  
Robin Andersson ◽  
Albin Sandelin

AbstractWe developed the CAGEfightR R/Biconductor-package for analyzing CAGE data. CAGEfightR allows for fast and memory efficient identification of transcription start sites (TSSs) and predicted enhancers. Downstream analysis, including annotation, quantification, visualization and TSS shape statistics are implemented in easy-to-use functions. The package is freely available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/CAGEfightR


2016 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 66-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jifeng Shen ◽  
Xin Zuo ◽  
Wankou Yang ◽  
Hualong Yu ◽  
Guohai Liu

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (04) ◽  
pp. 1650044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Anderson

In this paper, suite of relational notions of shape are presented at the level of configuration space geometry, with corresponding new theories of shape mechanics and shape statistics. These further generalize two quite well known examples: (i) Kendall’s (metric) shape space with his shape statistics and Barbour’s mechanics thereupon. (ii) Leibnizian relational space alias metric scale-and-shape space to which corresponds Barbour–Bertotti mechanics. This paper’s new theories include, using the invariant and group namings, (iii) Angle alias conformal shape mechanics. (iv) Area ratio alias e shape mechanics. (v) Area alias e scale-and-shape mechanics. (iii)–(v) rest respectively on angle space, area-ratio space, and area space configuration spaces. Probability and statistics applications are also pointed to in outline.(vi) Various supersymmetric counterparts of (i)–(v) are considered. Since supergravity differs considerably from GR-based conceptions of background independence, some of the new supersymmetric shape mechanics are compared with both. These reveal compatibility between supersymmetry and GR-based conceptions of background independence, at least within these simpler model arenas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document