Effect of direct-fed microbials on utilization of degradable intake protein in receiving steers

Kenney, N. M., Vanzant, E. S., Harmon, D. L. and McLeod, K. R. 2015. Effect of direct-fed microbials on utilization of degradable intake protein in receiving steers. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 95: 93–102. One hundred ninety-two crossbred beef steers (280±25 kg) were assigned to a 5×2 factorial; degradable intake protein (DIP; 80, 90, 100, 110, 120% of requirement) with and without a direct-fed microbial (DFM) primarily containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecium (109CFU steer−1d−1). Dry matter intake, morbidity, and immune response were not affected (P≥0.11). The first 28 d, average daily gain (ADG) did not differ with DIP in control, but increased in a cubic fashion with DFM (DIP×DFM; P=0.05). No differences (P≥0.25) in ADG occurred from days 29 to 56; however, there was a tendency (P=0.08) for a cubic increase in ADG with increasing DIP with DFM over 56 d. The first 28 d, growth efficiency did not differ across DIP levels in control but increased linearly with DFM (DIP×DFM; P=0.05). No differences (P≥0.21) in efficiency were observed from days 29 to 56 or overall. Without DFM, fecal pH decreased between days 7 and 14; however, with DFM there was no change in pH (DFM×time; P<0.05). Performance response to DFM is dependent on DIP; however, DFM does not impact morbidity or humoral immune response.

Barley- versus protein-supplemented corn-based diets for feedlot cattle evaluated using the NRC and CNCPS beef models

A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of supplementing a corn-based finishing diet [10.0% crude protein (CP), 6.2% degradable intake protein (DIP), dry matter basis, no protein supplementation] with DIP in the form of urea (13.0% CP, 9.1% DIP) or canola meal and urea (12.8% CP, 8.6% DIP) on dry matter intake (DMI) and average daily gain (ADG). Animal performances were compared with those obtained by feeding a barley-based diet (13.9% CP, 9.6% DIP). Crossbred beef steers (398 ± 28 kg) were allocated to 24 pens and six pens were assigned to each diet. There were no differences (P > 0.05) in DMI and ADG between cattle fed the barley diet and those fed the corn diets supplemented to provide a concentration of DIP similar to that supplied by the barley diet. However, ADG was 10% lower and DMI was 8% lower for cattle fed the corn diet with no protein supplementation (P < 0.05). The NRC and CNCPS models predicted the substantially lower gain of cattle fed the corn diet with no protein supplementation, but underestimated the improvement in performance when the corn diet was supplemented with urea or canola meal and urea to supply the requirement for DIP. Key words: Feedlot cattle, protein, corn, barley, growth, models