landowner survey
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Data in Brief ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 104674
Author(s):  
Donald G. Hodges ◽  
Binod P. Chapagain ◽  
Pattarawan Watcharaanantapong ◽  
Neelam C. Poudyal ◽  
Keith L. Kline ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 149-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Gordon Holley ◽  
Eric L. Taylor ◽  
William G. Ross

Abstract This study attempts to characterize the Native American forest landowners in a three-county area of southeastern Oklahoma through a mail-out landowner survey. The total forestland owned by the survey respondents totaled to 12,211 ac with a mean of 140 ac. However, 56% of the respondents own less than 80 ac. More than one-half of the Native American respondents live on or adjacent to their forestland and only 17% are absentee landowners. Almost 60% of the landowners indicated personal reasons as their primary reason for owning their forestland followed by 19% for economic uses and 17% for recreational uses. Over one-half of these landowners indicated they have harvested their forest sometime in the past. Of the 45% that have not harvested their forest in the past, 31% indicated that either stumpage prices were too low or that their trees were not mature yet. Although most Native American forest landowners are involved in managing their forestland, lack of knowledge on forest management and harvesting strategies is an impediment to more effective, active management.


2005 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 284-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urs P. Kreuter ◽  
Heidi E. Amestoy ◽  
Mort M. Kothmann ◽  
Darrell N. Ueckert ◽  
W. Allan McGinty ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbang Gan ◽  
Stephen H. Kolison

Abstract This study investigated the characteristics of minority forest landowners and their forest resources in Macon and Bullock counties in Alabama through a landowner survey. The size of forestland held by these landowners was relatively small, with a mean of 113 ac. Most of their forests were mixed pine and hardwood stands. The top ranked management objectives of these landowners were for timber production and wildlife (hunting). About two-thirds of these landowners have thinned or harvested their forests. However, the forestland has not significantly contributed to the landowners' income. The lack of capital, labor, and knowledge of forest management and marketing impeded the landowners from generating more benefits from their forestland. South. J. Appl. For. 23(3):175-178.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document