frequent attender
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
pp. emermed-2019-209122
Author(s):  
Geva Greenfield ◽  
Mitch Blair ◽  
Paul P Aylin ◽  
Sonia Saxena ◽  
Azeem Majeed ◽  
...  

BackgroundFrequent attendances of the same users in emergency departments (ED) can intensify workload pressures and are common among children, yet little is known about the characteristics of paediatric frequent users in EDs.AimTo describe the volume of frequent paediatric attendance in England and the demographics of frequent paediatric ED users in English hospitals.MethodWe analysed the Hospital Episode Statistics dataset for April 2014–March 2017. The study included 2 308 816 children under 16 years old who attended an ED at least once. Children who attended four times or more in 2015/2016 were classified as frequent users. The preceding and subsequent years were used to capture attendances bordering with the current year. We used a mixed effects logistic regression with a random intercept to predict the odds of being a frequent user in children from different sociodemographic groups.ResultsOne in 11 children (9.1%) who attended an ED attended four times or more in a year. Infants had a greater likelihood of being a frequent attender (OR 3.24, 95% CI 3.19 to 3.30 vs 5 to 9 years old). Children from more deprived areas had a greater likelihood of being a frequent attender (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.54 to 1.59 vs least deprived). Boys had a slightly greater likelihood than girls (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.06). Children of Asian and mixed ethnic groups were more likely to be frequent users than those from white ethnic groups, while children from black and 'other' had a lower likelihood (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05; OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06; OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.90; OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.92, respectively).ConclusionOne in 11 children was a frequent attender. Interventions for reducing paediatric frequent attendance need to target infants and families living in deprived areas.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiia T. M. Reho ◽  
Salla A. Atkins ◽  
Nina Talola ◽  
Markku P. T. Sumanen ◽  
Mervi Viljamaa ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. 100673
Author(s):  
Ayokunle Osonuga ◽  
Adebayo DaCosta ◽  
Ekaterina Rodrigues

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i14-i17
Author(s):  
O Davies ◽  
S James

Abstract Topic Setting up an interface geriatrics service in a seaside area with a large elderly population. Many elderly patients are readmitted due to the challenge of managing their chronic health conditions in the community. These patients are frail, with frequently exacerbated chronic conditions causing regular readmissions. We noted that treatment was rarely changed during these admissions and patients were not uniformly managed. Aims Aims for this project were to improve care for older people, reduce readmissions and produce clear patient care plans. Interventions Our first PDSA cycle involved implementing geriatrician presence at community MDTs (involving social services, GPs, intermediate care teams, and various others). This generated home visits to several patients, with a mix of acute and chronic issues. We offered Advance Care planning where appropriate to these patients. We noted several patients were repeatedly discussed at MDT. This brought into focus frequent attenders who were usually well-known to the community. In the next cycle we introduced ‘frequent attender’ plans for these patients, ensuring a unified approach to their management. Subsequent cycles involved geriatrician presence at the ‘frequent attenders’ steering group, and further links with community teams. Our primary intervention has been Advance care & frequent attender plans offering tailored management for complex patients. These are completed by a geriatrician discussing patients wishes for treatment and future care. Improvements Readmission rates show up to 90% reduction in admissions/ED attendances for patients following care plan implementation. Feedback from families and patients is positive – the service is ‘pragmatic and supportive’, delivering ‘empathetic care’. Discussion Implementing an interface geriatrics service highlights the importance of caring for frail patients in their preferred place of care, reducing unnecessary/inappropriate hospitalisations. Geriatrician presence at community MDTs has improved care by offering prompt access to medical advice and review of complex patients. It highlights patients presenting frequently to services, allowing us to work with patients and families to improve management. A frequent attender list generated by the hospital helps target patients for whom intervention will give significant benefit. We plan to extend this further by working with nursing homes that have high conveyancing rates. The service is being extended to more areas within our region, and we are working with GPs and care homes to further offer advance care planning to vulnerable and frail patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuzeng Shen ◽  
Yee Chien Tay ◽  
Edward Wee Kwan Teo ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Shao Wei Lam ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 141-142
Author(s):  
Stevan R. Bruijns ◽  
Lee A. Wallis
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1347-1357 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Á. BELLÓN ◽  
A. DELGADO ◽  
J. DE DIOS LUNA ◽  
P. LARDELLI

Background. The reasons for high use of primary care, and in particular the role of psychosocial factors, remain unclear.Methods. We identified and interviewed 236 frequent attenders and 420 normal users, matched by age and sex, of a public Health Centre in Granada, Spain. Users were questioned about mental health (GHQ-28), social support (Duke-UNC-11), family dysfunction (family APGAR) and health beliefs (health belief model, locus of health control and medical care expectations). We also measured a set of individual, social and illness variables.Results. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed that mental health was the main factor associated with frequent attender status (odds ratio = 3·1; 2·4–3·9). The association was stronger than that between frequent attender status and perceived illness, and between the former and reported chronic illness. Family dysfunction and perceived susceptibility to and severity of disease were also significantly but more weakly associated with frequent attender status. Affective support was more strongly associated with FA status than was confidant support, but both associations disappeared when mental health and family function were controlled for.Conclusions. Our findings document the association of psychosocial factors and primary health care use. We suggest that the effective management of mental health problems from a family-based approach may reduce primary health care high use.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document