Outcomes of Surface Replacement Arthroplasty in Metacarpophalangeal Joints Affected by Noninflammatory Arthritis

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) for noninflammatory arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Methods Records from 20 SRAs performed between 1995 and 2017 in 17 patients with noninflammatory arthritis affecting the MCP joint were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow up was 6.6 years. Results Three arthroplasties (15%) underwent 4 revision operations. The 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year rates of survival from surface replacement implant revision were 90%, 90%, 79%, and 79%, respectively. Major complications occurring in revised joints included arthrodesis (n = 1) and amputation (n = 1). The overall reoperation rate was 35%. The 2-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year rates of overall reoperation-free survival were 75%, 69%, 60%, and 60%, respectively. Conclusions Pain ratings and MCP arc of motion significantly improved following arthroplasty. Metacarpophalangeal SRA for noninflammatory arthritis can improve arc of motion and pain. Revision is uncommon; however, 1 in 3 joints requires reoperation.

Long-term Outcomes of MCP Surface Replacement Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) can be used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affecting the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. The authors of this study sought to investigate the outcomes of MCP SRA in patients with RA. Methods: Retrospective review of medical records and an institutional joint registry were used to gather data on 80 MCP SRAs performed in 27 patients with RA. Data collected included demographics, SRA revisions, reoperations, complications, pain, and MCP arc of motion. Results: The mean postoperative follow-up was 9.5 years (range, 2.1-20.5 years), with all SRAs achieving at least 2 years of follow-up. Thirteen digits (16%) underwent revision arthroplasty, and 29 (36%) required reoperation. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year rates of survival from implant revision were 95%, 85%, 80%, and 69%, respectively. The 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-year rates of survival from overall reoperation were 80%, 65%, 55%, and 46%, respectively. Metacarpophalangeal joint arc of motion, grip strength, and pain levels significantly improved following surgery. Conclusions: Metacarpophalangeal SRA can offer benefit to patients with RA for improvement in function and pain. High overall reoperation rates remain concerning; however, most do not involve arthroplasty revision.

Is there evidence to support an indication for surface replacement arthroplasty?

AimsSurface replacement arthroplasty (SRA), compared with traditional total hip arthroplasty (THA), is more expensive and carries unique concern related to metal ions production and hypersensitivity. Additionally, SRA is a more demanding procedure with a decreased margin for error compared with THA. To justify its use, SRA must demonstrate comparable component survival and some clinical advantages. We therefore performed a systematic literature review to investigate the differences in complication rates, patient-reported outcomes, stress shielding, and hip biomechanics between SRA and THA.Materials and MethodsA systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE and EMBASE search engines. Inclusion criteria were level I to level III articles that reported clinical outcomes following primary SRA compared with THA. An initial search yielded 2503 potential articles for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included review articles, level IV or level V evidence, less than one year’s follow-up, and previously reported data. In total, 27 articles with 4182 patients were available to analyze.ResultsFracture and infection rates were similar between SRA and THA, while dislocation rates were lower in SRA compared with THA. SRA demonstrated equivalent patient-reported outcome scores with greater activity scores and a return to high-level activities compared with THA. SRA more reliably restored native hip joint biomechanics and decreased stress shielding of the proximal femur compared with THA.ConclusionIn young active men with osteoarthritis, there is evidence that SRA offers some potential advantages over THA, including: improved return to high level activities and sport, restoration of native hip biomechanics, and decreased proximal femoral stress shielding. Continued long-term follow up is required to assess ultimate survivorship of SRA.

Surface Replacement Arthroplasty Using a Volar Approach for Osteoarthritis of Proximal Interphalangeal Joint: Results After a Minimum 5-Year Follow-up

Background: Surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) through a volar approach for the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint can preserve the integrity of the extensor tendon, which allows early range of motion (ROM) exercise postoperatively. However, a few reports have shown that the PIP ROM tends to decline with longer follow-up. The goal of this study is to assess the results of at least 5 years of follow-up of SRA through a volar approach and also to investigate the cause of deterioration of ROM with time after SRA through this approach. Methods: Eleven fingers with degenerative osteoarthritis that underwent SRA through the volar approach were examined. ROM of the PIP joint preoperation, 1 year after the surgery, and at final follow-up was measured and statistically analyzed. Also, the relationship between PIP ROM and the osteophyte developed postoperatively was examined. Results: The average follow-up period was 7.3 years. The average PIP ROM of the PIP joints was 52.3° preoperatively, 54.1° at 1 year postoperatively, and 31.1° at the final follow-up. PIP ROM at the final follow-up was significantly decreased compared with that preoperatively or at 1 year postoperatively. Also, the development of an osteophyte was negatively correlated with the ROM of the PIP joint at the final follow-up. Conclusions: PIP ROM after SRA through a volar approach has the tendency to deteriorate with a longer follow-up. Development of an osteophyte is considered to be a main risk factor of deterioration in the cases of SRA through a volar approach.

Post-Operative Contracture of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint after Surface Replacement Arthroplasty Using a Volar Approach

Background: Postoperative contracture as a major complication of surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) remains an unresolved problem. Contracture after SRA can occur early in the postoperative period due to mechanical dysfunction, and tardy contracture where ROM declines with time postoperatively is also reported. Methods: 13 fingers with degenerative osteoarthritis and two fingers with post-traumatic arthritis where SRA was performed using volar approach were involved. Contracture was defined as limited ROM of less than 35 degrees. Cases were then categorized into two groups according to time of onset of contracture; early contracture and tardy contracture. Characteristic findings of postoperative X-rays in each contracture group were examined. Required procedures and efficacy of any further surgery was also reviewed. Results: Early contracture was observed in three cases, all of which suffered intra-operative fracture or fragility of the central slip insertion on the dorsal rim of the middle phalanx. This was observed in a further two cases, both of which deteriorated to tardy contracture. Tardy contracture was observed in five cases, and the average ROM was 63 degrees preoperatively, 48 degrees one year postoperatively and 21 degrees at the most recent follow-up, or at the time of the second surgery. In the three cases, development of osteophyte formation on the volar aspect of the proximal head component was observed on the follow-up X-rays. Required further surgeries were resection of the volar plate in two cases, resection of ossification in one and resection of the osteophyte in two. The results of further surgeries were mediocre in all but one case. Conclusions: This study showed that intra-operative fracture or fragility of the central slip insertion was a risk factor for postoperative contracture after SRA, and that development of osteophyte formation can be a cause of deterioration in ROM of the PIP joint.