meniscus replacement
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

54
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 101089
Author(s):  
Rong Yang ◽  
Chuanchuan Fan ◽  
Yiming Dou ◽  
Xiaoping Zhang ◽  
Ziyang Xu ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Catherine E. Miles ◽  
Mariana R.N. Lima ◽  
Fatima Buevich ◽  
Christine Gwin ◽  
N.Sanjeeva Murthy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuanchuan Fan ◽  
Ziyang Xu ◽  
Tengling Wu ◽  
Chunyan Cui ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
...  

3D printing stiff and lubricative hydrogel-based meniscus substitute has been challenging since printability and stiffness compromise each other. In this work, based on an upgraded self-thickening and self-strengthening strategy, a...


Biomaterials ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 120527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Puetzer ◽  
Tianchi Ma ◽  
Ignacio Sallent ◽  
Amy Gelmi ◽  
Molly M. Stevens

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e1163-e1169
Author(s):  
Oleg Milenin ◽  
Sergiy Strafun ◽  
Ruslan Sergienko ◽  
Kirill Baranov

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Matthias Koch ◽  
Clemens Memmel ◽  
Florian Zeman ◽  
Christian G. Pfeifer ◽  
Johannes Zellner ◽  
...  

Meniscus therapy is a challenging process. Besides the respective surgical procedure such as partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair, or meniscus replacement, early postoperative rehabilitation is important for meniscus regeneration and return to sport and work as well as long-term outcome. Various recommendations are available. However, the current literature lacks information concerning the actual early rehabilitation in daily routine recommended by orthopedic surgeons. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate currently used standard early rehabilitation protocols in the daily routine of orthopedic surgeons. This study investigated the recommendations and concepts for early rehabilitation after meniscus therapy given by German, Austrian, and Swiss orthopedic institutions. Standardized criteria such as weight bearing, range of motion, use of an orthosis, and rehabilitation training were analyzed according to the conducted surgical procedure: partial meniscectomy, meniscus repair, or meniscus replacement. The analysis of standard rehabilitation concepts for partial meniscectomy (n=15), meniscus repair (n=54), and meniscus replacement (n=7) showed significantly earlier functional rehabilitation in all criteria after partial meniscectomy in contrast to meniscus repair techniques (p<0.001). In addition, significant restrictions were found in full weight bearing, full range of motion, and the use of braces. In summary, a wide range of recommendations for weight bearing, ROM, brace therapy, and mobilization is available, particularly after meniscus repair and meniscus replacement. Most concepts are in accordance with those described in the current literature. Further research is necessary to enhance the scientific evidence on currently used early rehabilitation concepts after meniscus therapy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 279-295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hélder Pereira ◽  
Ibrahim Fatih Cengiz ◽  
Sérgio Gomes ◽  
João Espregueira-Mendes ◽  
Pedro L. Ripoll ◽  
...  

Clinical management of meniscal injuries has changed radically in recent years. We have moved from the model of systematic tissue removal (meniscectomy) to understanding the need to preserve the tissue. Based on the increased knowledge of the basic science of meniscal functions and their role in joint homeostasis, meniscus preservation and/or repair, whenever indicated and possible, are currently the guidelines for management. However, when repair is no longer possible or when facing the fact of the previous partial, subtotal or total loss of the meniscus, meniscus replacement has proved its clinical value. Nevertheless, meniscectomy remains amongst the most frequent orthopaedic procedures. Meniscus replacement is currently possible by means of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) which provides replacement of the whole meniscus with or without bone plugs/slots. Partial replacement has been achieved by means of meniscal scaffolds (mainly collagen or polyurethane-based). Despite the favourable clinical outcomes, it is still debatable whether MAT is capable of preventing progression to osteoarthritis. Moreover, current scaffolds have shown some fundamental limitations, such as the fact that the newly formed tissue may be different from the native fibrocartilage of the meniscus. Regenerative tissue engineering strategies have been used in an attempt to provide a new generation of meniscal implants, either for partial or total replacement. The goal is to provide biomaterials (acellular or cell-seeded constructs) which provide the biomechanical properties but also the biological features to replace the loss of native tissue. Moreover, these approaches include possibilities for patient-specific implants of correct size and shape, as well as advanced strategies combining cells, bioactive agents, hydrogels or gene therapy. Herein, the clinical evidence and tips concerning MAT, currently available meniscus scaffolds and future perspectives are discussed.Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180103


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 379-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim A. Ghodbane ◽  
Andrzej Brzezinski ◽  
Jay M. Patel ◽  
William H. Plaff ◽  
Kristen N. Marzano ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (8) ◽  
pp. 2457-2465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salim A. Ghodbane ◽  
Jay M. Patel ◽  
Andrzej Brzezinski ◽  
Tyler M. Lu ◽  
Charles J. Gatt ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document