P047 SUTURE-TOOL: A SUTURING DEICE FOR SWIFT AND STANDARDIZED ABDOMINAL APONEUROSIS CLOSURE

Aim Introduction Surgeons can reduce incisional hernia formation by adhering to standardized techniques for incisional wound closure. This is often neglected by the time a long operation is to be ended and can lead to the risk of developing an incisional hernia or a wound rupture. To address this issue, a suturing machine (Suture-TOOL) was developed for swift and standardized abdominal closure. The aim was to compare the user safety, speed, and suturing quality between Suture-TOOL and manual Needle-Driver suturing. Material and Methods Fifteen surgeons who were specialists in surgery, urology, and gynaecology as well as surgical trainees were invited. The Suture-TOOL was presented to the surgeons who read the instructions for use before starting the test. Each surgeon closed nine 15-cm-long incisions in a human body model; six with Suture-TOOL and three with the Needle-Driver technique. Gloves were examined for puncture damage. Endpoints were suture-length/wound-length (SL/WL)-ratio, closure time, number of stitches, learning curve, and glove puncture rate. A VAS-evaluation concerning different Suture-TOOL user impressions was completed. Results SL/WL-ratio ≥4 was 98% for Suture-TOOL versus 69% for Needle-Driver (p < 0,001). Suture time was shorter for Suture-TOOL (p = 0,013). The median SL/WL-ratio was similar between the groups. The learning curve plateaued after three closures using Suture-TOOL. Two glove punctures were detected—all in the Needle-Driver group. Suture-TOOL received high VAS scores for all measured functionalities. Conclusions Suture-TOOL is a promising device for clinical use. It is safe, easy, and fast resulting in a high-quality suture lines with a short learning curve and a high functionality ranking.

1314 Ad-Hoc Suturing Course Teaching: A Valuable Tool for A New Starter

Aim The study aims to assess effectiveness of a three-hour suturing skills course for healthcare professionals at a tertiary hospital in London. Intended outcomes were improvement in confidence and proficiency at simple interrupted sutures. Method Four suturing sessions were delivered over five months to healthcare workers new to the clinical setting. The session included lecture, video, and practical skills. Participants completed a pre- and post-course survey to measure confidence levels in suturing using Likert scale. Participants performed simple interrupted sutures for 10 minutes in a pre- and post-course assessment. Performance was assessed using a suturing proficiency proforma. Pre- and post-course data was compared to assess improvement. Results Fifty participants attended the course. 93% had previous suturing teaching. Pre-course confidence in simple interrupted suture was 3.1 (SD = 1.2) and post course was 4.8 (SD = 0.2). One tailed T score was 14.7, and the difference was significant (p < 0.05). Pre- and post-course assessment demonstrated improvement in the following parameters and participant proportions: handling of the needle driver (50%, n = 25), adequate placement of needle driver (68%, n = 34), appropriate needle angle entering skin (60%, n = 30), following needle curve (36%, n = 18), non-touch technique (64%, n = 32), surgical knot tying (56%, n = 28). Average number of sutures completed in 10 minutes increased by 1.9 times. Conclusions The majority of participants had previously been taught suturing in other settings; however, data demonstrated improvement in confidence and performance. Ad-hoc suturing skill teaching is a valuable tool to increase confidence of healthcare workers at early stages in their careers.

Initial experience using a handheld fully articulating software-driven laparoscopic needle driver in TAPP inguinal hernia repair

Background The laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair is a widely performed minimally invasive operation, but can present considerable ergonomic challenges for the surgeon. Our objective was to determine if a novel handheld software-driven laparoscopic articulating needle driver can mitigate these difficulties. Methods The video recordings of a consecutive series of TAPP cases by a single surgeon using the articulating device were compared with a series of cases using straight-stick laparoscopy. Two critical steps of the procedure were analyzed for time: mesh fixation and peritoneal suture closure. These steps were then compared before and after 10 initial consecutive cases to analyze whether the surgeon demonstrated improvement. A cost analysis was also performed between the two techniques. Results For mesh fixation, the surgeon averaged 227 s using tacker devices, compared with 462.4 s using the novel laparoscopic device (p = 0.06). For the peritoneal closure component of the operation, the surgeon improved the time per suture pass during closure from 60.61 s during the first 10 cases to 38.84 s after the first 10 cases (p = 0.0004), which was comparable to the time per stitch for standard laparoscopy (34.8 s vs 34.84 s, p = 0.997). Left-sided inguinal hernia repairs using the articulating device demonstrated a significantly longer time per stitch during peritoneal closure compared to the right side after first 10 cases (left: 40.62 s; right: 27.91, p = 0.005). Our direct cost analysis demonstrated that suture closure of the peritoneum using the articulating device was more cost-effective than tack fixation. Conclusions After only a 10 case initial experience, a laparoscopic hand-held articulating needle driver is comparable to standard laparoscopy to complete suture mesh fixation and peritoneal closure for TAPP inguinal hernia repair. Further, the feasibility of suture mesh fixation minimizes the need for costly tacker devices. This instrument appears to be a promising tool in this largely minimally invasive era of hernia repair.

Primary Dural Repair via an Endoscopic Endonasal Corridor: Preliminary Development of a 3D-Printed Model for Training

Objectives Endonasal suturing is an investigational method for dural repair that has been reported to decrease the incidence of cerebrospinal fluid fistula. This method requires handling of single-shaft instrumentation in the narrow endonasal corridor. In this study, we designed a low-cost, surgical model using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology to simulate dural repair through the endonasal corridor and subsequently assess the utility of the model for surgical training. Methods Using an Ultimaker 2+ printer, a 3D-printed replica of the cranial base and nasal cavity was fitted with tissue allograft to recapitulate the dural layer. Residents, fellows, and attending surgeons were asked to place two sutures using a 0-degree endoscope and single-shaft needle driver. Task completion time was recorded. Participants were asked to fill out a Likert scale questionnaire after the experiment. Results Twenty-six participants were separated into groups based on their prior endoscope experience: novice, intermediate, and expert. Twenty-one (95.5%) residents and fellows rated the model as “excellent” or “good” in enhancing their technical skills with endoscopic instrumentation. Three of four (75%) of attendings felt that the model was “excellent” or “good” in usefulness for training in dural suturing. Novice participants required an average of 11 minutes for task completion, as compared with 8.7 minutes for intermediates and 5.7 minutes for experts. Conclusion The proposed model appears to be highly effective in enhancing the endoscopic skills and recapitulating the task of dural repair. Such a low-cost model may be especially important in enhancing endoscopic facility in countries/regions with limited access to cadaveric specimens.

Novel Real-time Digital Pressure Sensor Reveals Wide Variations in Current Nerve Crush Injury Models

ABSTRACT Introduction: Peripheral nerve crush injury (PNCI) models are commonly used to study nerve damage and the potential beneficial effects of novel therapeutic strategies. Current models of PNCI rely on inter-device and operator precision to limit the variation with applied pressure. Although the inability to accurately quantify the PNCI pressure may result in reduced reproducibility between animals and studies, there is very limited information on the standardization and quantification of applied pressure with PNCI. To address this deficit, we constructed a novel device comprised of an Arduino UNO microcontroller board and Force Sensitive Resistor capable of reporting the real-time pressure applied to a nerve. Methods: Two forceps and two needle drivers were used to perform 30-second PNCIs to the sciatic nerves of mice (n = 5/group). Needle drivers were set to the first notch, and a jig was used to hold the forceps pinch at a reproducible pressure. The Force Sensitive Resistor was interposed in-series between the nerve and instrument during PNCI. Results: Data collected from these procedures displayed average needle driver pressures an order of multitude greater than forceps pressures. Additionally, needle driver inter- and intra-procedure pressure remained more consistent than forceps pressure, with needle driver coefficient of variation equal to 14.5% vs. a forceps coefficient of variation equal to 45.4%. Conclusions: This is the first demonstration of real-time pressure measurements in PNCI models and it reveals that the applied pressures are dependent on the types of device used. The large disparity in pressure represents an inability to apply graded accurate and consistent intermediate pressure gradients in PNCI. These findings indicate a need for documentation of pressure severity as a screening for PNCI in animals, and the real-time pressure sensor could be a useful tool in monitoring and applying consistent pressure, reducing the outcome variability within the same experimental model of PNCI.

Suture-Tool: A Mechanical Needle Driver for Standardized Wound Closure

Introduction A laparotomy is commonly required to gain abdominal access. A safe standardized access and closure technique is warranted to minimize abdominal wall complications like wound infections, burst abdomen and incisional hernias. Stitches are recommended to be small and placed tightly, obtaining a suture length-to-incision length (SL/WL) ratio of ≥ 4:1. This can be time-consuming and difficult to achieve especially following long trying surgical procedures. The aim was to develop and evaluate a new mechanical suture device for standardized wound closure. Methods A mechanical suture device (Suture-tool) was developed in collaboration between a medical technology engineer team with the aim to achieve a standardized suture line of high quality that could be performed speedy and safe. Ten surgeons closed an incision in an animal tissue model after a standardized introduction of the instrument comparing the device to conventional needle driver suturing (NDS) using the 4:1 technique. Outcome measures were SL/WL ratio, number of stitches and suture time. Results In total, 80 suture lines were evaluated. SL/WL ratio of ≥ 4 was achieved in 95% using the Suture-tool and 30% using NDS (p < 0,001). Number of stitches was similar. Suture time was 30% shorter using the Suture-tool compared to NDS (2 min 54 s vs. 4 min 5 s; p < 0.001). Conclusions The mechanical needle driver seems to be a promising device to perform a speedy standardized high-quality suture line for fascial closure.