vertical velocity gradient
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

4
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jannik Schottler ◽  
Agnieszka Hölling ◽  
Joachim Peinke ◽  
Michael Hölling

Abstract. The effect of vertical velocity gradients on the total power output of two aligned model wind turbines as a function of yaw misalignment of the upstream turbine is studied experimentally. It is shown that asymmetries of the power output of the downstream turbine and the combined power of both with respect to the upstream turbine's yaw misalignment angle can be linked to the vertical velocity gradient of the inflow.


2010 ◽  
Vol 6 (S274) ◽  
pp. 291-294
Author(s):  
Guillaume Molodij ◽  
Véronique Bommier

AbstractWe present an extension of the Unno-Rachkovsky solution that provides the theoretical profiles coming out of a Milne-Eddington atmosphere imbedded in a magnetic field, to the additional taking into account of a vertical velocity gradient. Thus, the theoretical profiles may display asymmetries as do the observed profiles, which facilitates the inversion based on the Unno-Rachkovsky theory, and leads to the additional determination of the vertical velocity gradient. We present UNNOFIT inversion on spectropolarimetric data performed on an active region of the Sun with the french-italian telescope THEMIS operated by CNRS and CNR on the island of Tenerife.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 1210-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. Nurul Kabir ◽  
D. J. Verschuur

A method of velocity analysis based on the common focusing point (CFP) method is presented. The two important aspects of the method are the use of the CFP domain and the use of a new parameterization—a vertical velocity gradient to describe the lateral velocity variation within a layer. The layer velocity is defined with only two parameters: an average velocity [Formula: see text]and a vertical velocity gradient (β). Layer velocity parameterization using [Formula: see text] and β assumes that the lithology of the layer is constant and that the overburden and fluid pressure increase linearly with depth. This type of parameterization is suitable for areas with gross changes in lithology (clastic‐carbonate‐salt) and for rock in hydrostatic equilibrium. A layer‐based model is required for these areas. The salt dome data example presented belongs to this type of area, so the layer‐based model with the defined parameterization produced a very good subsurface velocity model. The method is based on the principle of equal traveltime between the focusing operator and the corresponding focus point response. The velocity estimation problem is formulated as a constrained parametric inversion process. The method of perturbation is applied where linear assumptions are made; the velocity inversion, however, is a nonlinear problem, and the model parameter updates are computed iteratively using Newton’s method. The velocity model is built by layers in a top‐down approach, which makes the problem quasi‐linear.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document