genomic interaction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

13
(FIVE YEARS 2)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. J. M. Kuijpers ◽  
J. C. S. Kleinjans ◽  
D. G. J. Jennen

AbstractCancer is a complex disease where cancer cells express epigenetic and transcriptomic mechanisms to promote tumor initiation, progression, and survival. To extract relevant features from the 2019 Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE), a multi-layer nonnegative matrix factorization approach is used. We used relevant feature genes and DNA promoter regions to construct genomic interaction network to study gene–gene and gene—DNA promoter methylation relationships. Here, we identified a set of gene transcripts and methylated DNA promoter regions for different clusters, including one homogeneous lymphoid neoplasms cluster. In this cluster, we found different methylated transcription factors that affect transcriptional activation of EGFR and downstream interactions. Furthermore, the hippo-signaling pathway might not function properly because of DNA hypermethylation and low gene expression of both LATS2 and YAP1. Finally, we could identify a potential dysregulation of the CD28-CD86-CTLA4 axis. Characterizing the interaction of the epigenome and the transcriptome is vital for our understanding of cancer cell line behavior, not only for deepening insights into cancer-related processes but also for future disease treatment and drug development. Here we have identified potential candidates that characterize cancer cell lines, which give insight into the development and progression of cancers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 426 (2) ◽  
pp. 155-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine D. Reid ◽  
Kalpana Karra ◽  
Jessica Chang ◽  
Robert Piskol ◽  
Qin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dokyoon Kim ◽  
Ruowang Li ◽  
Anastasia Lucas ◽  
Shefali S Verma ◽  
Scott M Dudek ◽  
...  

It is common that cancer patients have different molecular signatures even though they have similar clinical features, such as histology, due to the heterogeneity of tumors. To overcome this variability, we previously developed a new approach incorporating prior biological knowledge that identifies knowledge-driven genomic interactions associated with outcomes of interest. However, no systematic approach has been proposed to identify interaction models between pathways based on multi-omics data. Here we have proposed such a novel methodological framework, called metadimensional knowledge-driven genomic interactions (MKGIs). To test the utility of the proposed framework, we applied it to an ovarian cancer dataset including multi-omics profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas to predict grade, stage, and survival outcome. We found that each knowledge-driven genomic interaction model, based on different genomic datasets, contains different sets of pathway features, which suggests that each genomic data type may contribute to outcomes in ovarian cancer via a different pathway. In addition, MKGI models significantly outperformed the single knowledge-driven genomic interaction model. From the MKGI models, many interactions between pathways associated with outcomes were found, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) signaling pathway, which are known to play important roles in cancer pathogenesis. The beauty of incorporating biological knowledge into the model based on multi-omics data is the ability to improve diagnosis and prognosis and provide better interpretability. Thus, determining variability in molecular signatures based on these interactions between pathways may lead to better diagnostic/treatment strategies for better precision medicine.


Oncogene ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (29) ◽  
pp. 3871-3880 ◽  
Author(s):  
A M Redmond ◽  
C Byrne ◽  
F T Bane ◽  
G D Brown ◽  
P Tibbitts ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e73974 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Zeitz ◽  
Ferhat Ay ◽  
Julia D. Heidmann ◽  
Paula L. Lerner ◽  
William S. Noble ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 2421-2424 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Felekkis ◽  
K. Voskarides ◽  
H. Dweep ◽  
C. Sticht ◽  
N. Gretz ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 279
Author(s):  
Sankar Surendran ◽  
Kimberlee Michals-Matalon ◽  
Michael J. Quast ◽  
Stephen K. Tyring ◽  
Jingna Wei ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 54 (11) ◽  
pp. 1265-1273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvin G McInnis ◽  
Danielle M Dick ◽  
Virginia L Willour ◽  
Dimitrios Avramopoulos ◽  
Dean F MacKinnon ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document