Study protocol for OptimalTTF-2: enhancing Tumor Treating Fields with skull remodeling surgery for first recurrence glioblastoma: a phase 2, multi-center, randomized, prospective, interventional trial

Background OptimalTTF-2 is a randomized, comparative, multi-center, investigator-initiated, interventional study aiming to test skull remodeling surgery in combination with Tumor Treating Fields therapy (TTFields) and best physicians choice medical oncological therapy for first recurrence in glioblastoma patients. OptimalTTF-2 is a phase 2 trial initiated in November 2020. Skull remodeling surgery consists of five burrholes, each 15 mm in diameter, directly over the tumor resection cavity. Preclinical research indicates that this procedure enhances the effect of Tumor Treating Fields considerably. We recently concluded a phase 1 safety/feasibility trial that indicated improved overall survival and no additional toxicity. This phase 2 trial aims to validate the efficacy of the proposed intervention. Methods The trial is designed as a comparative, 1:1 randomized, minimax two-stage phase 2 with an expected 70 patients to a maximum sample size of 84 patients. After 12-months follow-up of the first 52 patients, an interim futility analysis will be performed. The two trial arms will consist of either a) TTFields therapy combined with best physicians choice oncological treatment (control arm) or b) skull remodeling surgery, TTFields therapy and best practice oncology (interventional arm). Major eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, 1st recurrence of supratentorial glioblastoma, Karnofsky performance score ≥ 70, focal tumor, and lack of significant co-morbidity. Study design aims to detect a 20% increase in overall survival after 12 months (OS12), assuming OS12 = 40% in the control group and OS12 = 60% in the intervention group. Secondary endpoints include hazard rate ratio of overall survival and progression-free survival, objective tumor response rate, quality of life, KPS, steroid dose, and toxicity. Toxicity, objective tumor response rate, and QoL will be assessed every 3rd month. Endpoint data will be collected at the end of the trial, including the occurrence of suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs), unacceptable serious adverse events (SAEs), withdrawal of consent, or loss-to-follow-up. Discussion New treatment modalities are highly needed for first recurrence glioblastoma. Our proposed treatment modality of skull remodeling surgery, Tumor Treating Fields, and best practice medical oncological therapy may increase overall survival significantly. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0422399, registered 13. January 2020.

Pexidartinib for advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT): Long-term efficacy and safety from the phase 3 ENLIVEN and phase 1 PLX108-01 (TGCT cohort) studies.

11042 Background: TGCT is a rare, locally aggressive neoplasm of the joint/tendon sheath linked to colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) overexpression. Pexidartinib (pex), a selective inhibitor of CSF1 receptor, KIT, and FLT3-ITD, had a compelling tumor response rate in the TGCT cohort of a phase 1 study (NCT01004861) and significant tumor response vs placebo by RECIST v1.1 (39% vs 0%, P< 0.0001) and tumor volume score (TVS) (56% vs 0%, P< 0.0001) in the randomized, 2-part, crossover phase 3 ENLIVEN study (NCT02371369). Updated efficacy and safety with longer treatment are reported. Methods: Patients (pts) were ≥18 y with TGCT that was inoperable or for which surgery would likely be associated with worsening functional limitation or severe morbidity. Best overall response (complete or partial [CR/PR]) and duration of response (DOR) by RECIST and TVS were assessed by independent central review. Data cutoff was Jan 31, 2018, 16-67 mo after pts’ first dose. Results: In both studies 130 pts received pex, 61 ongoing at data cutoff. Median treatment duration was 17 mo (1, 60+). CR/PR rates were high and consistent and, together with DOR, improved with prolongation of treatment (Table). Most frequent adverse events were hair color change (75%), fatigue (60%), nausea (45%), arthralgia (38%), AST increase (30%), and diarrhea (30%). In ENLIVEN part 1, 3 of 61 (5%) pts had reversible ALT and AST ≥3 × ULN with TBil and ALP ≥2 × ULN; all started in the first 8 weeks of treatment, and no new cases emerged with continuation of treatment. Conclusions: Tumor response rate increased with continuation of pex treatment. The safety profile remained similar, with no new mixed or cholestatic hepatotoxicity. Clinical trial information: NCT01004861 and NCT02371369. [Table: see text]

Effectiveness and tolerability of nimotuzumab in unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic esophageal cancer: Indian hospital-based retrospective evidence

Context: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overly expressed in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and is important prognostic and predictive biomarker. Nimotuzumab is a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody and has documented promising clinical outcomes and survival rates in various solid tumors with high EGFR expression. Aims: Attempt to fill gap on paucity of data in India on the efficacy of Nimotuzumab in the treatment of locally advanced/metastatic ESCC. Settings and Design: Hospital records of 15 patients with unresectable, locally advanced/metastatic esophageal cancers, histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma being treated with Nimotuzumab along with standard treatments from October 2006 to November 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects and Methods: The tumor response rate and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. All patients were assessed for toxicity and adverse events (AEs) as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4. Results: Majority had lower thoracic esophageal cancer. Tumor response rate observed was as follows 33% had a complete response, 67% had a partial response, and objective response rate was 100%. Survival rate at 1-, 3-, and 5-year was 58.33%, 29.17%, and 29.17%, respectively. Median OS was 26.8 months (95% confidence interval, 2.63–not reached). No Grade III or Grade IV AEs were observed. No added toxicity was observed due to nimotuzumab.Conclusions: Nimotuzumab combined with standard treatment in locally advanced/metastatic ESCC improved the survival rate and achieved a better tumor response rate without accumulation of toxicity and was well tolerated.

Analysis of a large patient cohort with nivolumab: Predictive clinical factors for continued benefit after an immune-related adverse event.

e14600 Background: Nivolumab (NIVO), a PD-1 inhibitor, is used in various advanced malignancies with meaningful and durable outcomes. However, its use can be limited by severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We analyzed our large single institution patient cohort who have been treated with NIVO to risk stratify and identify clinical factors associated with continued benefit after irAEs. Methods: 125 patients with advanced malignancies, treated with NIVO during 2011-2016 at the University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, were evaluated. Inclusion criteria included a minimum of 1 completed treatment of NIVO (1 or 3mg/kg). Stratifying factors including age, gender, BMI, ethnicity, co-morbidities, pretreatment WBC and albumin, number of treatments received, type of malignancy, number of metastatic sites, overall tumor response rate (ORR), irAEs, and tumor response rates after irAE were identified. Results: Primary sites of cancer for the 125 patients who received NIVO were lung (44, 35%), melanoma (43, 34%), head-neck (8, 6%), renal (14, 11%), Hodgkin’s (16, 13%), 2 patients with more than one malignancy (1 with lung and head-neck, and 1 with lung and melanoma), and other non-approved indications (16, 13%). The overall tumor response rate was 34.4%. Total All CTCAE v4 grades irAEs experienced were 32% (40/125), and 33% (13/40) were severe (grade > 3). Eighteen (18/40, 45%) patients continued to have tumor response after experiencing any grade irAE. The mean age of those experiencing an irAE with subsequent tumor control (CR, PR, or SD) was 72.3 years, mean BMI 28.2 kg/m2, 38.9% were female, 11.1% were non-Caucasian, 61.1% had > 2 co-morbidities, 72.2% with > 2 metastatic sites and the mean albumin was 3.4 g/dl. Conclusions: Patients who had a tumor response after being re-challenged with NIVO, despite experiencing an irAE, were found to be older, had a higher BMI, an increased number of co-morbidities, higher tumor burden, and mean albumin > 3.0g/dl. Risk stratifying these patients prior to starting treatment is possible and can be helpful in anticipating which patients should be re-challenged or will have continued benefit with NIVO after experiencing an irAE.

Olaparib Monotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation

Purpose Olaparib is an oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor with activity in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) –associated breast and ovarian cancers. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of olaparib in a spectrum of BRCA1/2-associated cancers. Patients and Methods This multicenter phase II study enrolled individuals with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent cancer. Eligibility included ovarian cancer resistant to prior platinum; breast cancer with ≥ three chemotherapy regimens for metastatic disease; pancreatic cancer with prior gemcitabine treatment; or prostate cancer with progression on hormonal and one systemic therapy. Olaparib was administered at 400 mg twice per day. The primary efficacy end point was tumor response rate. Results A total of 298 patients received treatment and were evaluable. The tumor response rate was 26.2% (78 of 298; 95% CI, 21.3 to 31.6) overall and 31.1% (60 of 193; 95% CI, 24.6 to 38.1), 12.9% (eight of 62; 95% CI, 5.7 to 23.9), 21.7% (five of 23; 95% CI, 7.5 to 43.7), and 50.0% (four of eight; 95% CI, 15.7 to 84.3) in ovarian, breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, respectively. Stable disease ≥ 8 weeks was observed in 42% of patients (95% CI, 36.0 to 47.4), including 40% (95% CI, 33.4 to 47.7), 47% (95% CI, 34.0 to 59.9), 35% (95% CI, 16.4 to 57.3), and 25% (95% CI, 3.2 to 65.1) of those with ovarian, breast, pancreatic, or prostate cancer, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. Grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported for 54% of patients; anemia was the most common (17%). Conclusion Responses to olaparib were observed across different tumor types associated with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Olaparib warrants further investigation in confirmatory studies.