paradigmatic structure
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

44
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Author(s):  
Scott Jukes ◽  
Alistair Stewart ◽  
Marcus Morse

Abstract Situated within a series of river journeys, this inquiry considers the role of material landscape in shaping learning possibilities and explores practices of reading landscapes diffractively. We consider ways we might pay attention to the ever-changing flux of places while experimenting with posthuman pedagogical praxis. Methodologically, we embrace the post-qualitative provocation to do research differently by enacting a new empiricism that does not ground the inquiry in a paradigmatic structure. In doing so, we rethink conventional notions of method and data as we create a series of short videos from footage recorded during canoeing journeys with tertiary outdoor environmental education students. These videos, along with a student poem, form the empirical materials in this project. Video allows us to closely analyse more-than-human entanglements, contemplating the diverse ways we can participate with and read landscapes in these contexts. We aim to provoke diffractive thought and elicit affective dimensions of material encounters, rather than offer representational findings. This project intends to open possibilities for post-qualitative research, inspired by posthuman and new materialist orientations.


Author(s):  
Moussa Amrani ◽  
Dominique Blouin ◽  
Robert Heinrich ◽  
Arend Rensink ◽  
Hans Vangheluwe ◽  
...  

AbstractThe complexity of cyber–physical systems (CPSs) is commonly addressed through complex workflows, involving models in a plethora of different formalisms, each with their own methods, techniques, and tools. Some workflow patterns, combined with particular types of formalisms and operations on models in these formalisms, are used successfully in engineering practice. To identify and reuse them, we refer to these combinations of workflow and formalism patterns as modelling paradigms. This paper proposes a unifying (Descriptive) Framework to describe these paradigms, as well as their combinations. This work is set in the context of Multi-Paradigm Modelling (MPM), which is based on the principle to model every part and aspect of a system explicitly, at the most appropriate level(s) of abstraction, using the most appropriate modelling formalism(s) and workflows. The purpose of the Descriptive Framework presented in this paper is to serve as a basis to reason about these formalisms, workflows, and their combinations. One crucial part of the framework is the ability to capture the structural essence of a paradigm through the concept of a paradigmatic structure. This is illustrated informally by means of two example paradigms commonly used in CPS: Discrete Event Dynamic Systems and Synchronous Data Flow. The presented framework also identifies the need to establish whether a paradigm candidate follows, or qualifies as, a (given) paradigm. To illustrate the ability of the framework to support combining paradigms, the paper shows examples of both workflow and formalism combinations. The presented framework is intended as a basis for characterisation and classification of paradigms, as a starting point for a rigorous formalisation of the framework (allowing formal analyses), and as a foundation for MPM tool development.


Morphology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-82
Author(s):  
Enrique L. Palancar

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Travis Eisemann ◽  
Frederick Allen ◽  
Kelly Lau ◽  
Gregory R. Shimamura ◽  
Philip D. Jeffrey ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTFusion of intracellular trafficking vesicles is mediated by the assembly of soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein receptors (SNAREs) to form membrane-bridging complexes. Also required for SNARE-mediated membrane fusion are Sec1/Munc18-family (SM) proteins, SNARE chaperones that can function as templates to catalyze SNARE complex assembly. In the paradigmatic structure of an SM–SNARE complex, Munc18-1 bound to the Qa-SNARE syntaxin 1, the SNARE protein is trapped in an autoinhibited closed conformation that prevents it from entering into SNARE complexes. Here, we present the structure of a second SM–Qa-SNARE complex, Vps45–Tlg2. Strikingly, Vps45 holds Tlg2 in an open conformation, with its SNARE motif disengaged from its three-helical Habc domain and its linker region unfolded. The domain 3a helical hairpin of Vps45 is unfurled, exposing the presumptive R-SNARE binding site to allow template complex formation. Tlg2 has a pronounced tendency to self-associate via its SNARE motif, and we demonstrate that Vps45 can rescue Tlg2 oligomers into stoichiometric Vps45–Tlg2 complexes. Our findings demonstrate that SM proteins can engage Qa-SNAREs using at least two different modes, one in which the SNARE is closed and one in which it is open.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-87
Author(s):  
Stephen Wechsler

Evidence from the study of verbal argument alternations suggests that the syntactic structure of an event-denoting clause often reflects the structure of the event it denotes, in the sense that parts of the clause refer to aspects of the event. The patterns of such mappings between clause structure and event structure tend to be crosslinguistically uniform. Proffered explanations for these phenomena fall into two distinct theoretical currents. Lexicalists explain these phenomena in terms of the inherent paradigmatic structure of the lexicon, which leads verbs with similar meanings to have similar valence structures. Constructionists see these phenomena as evidence that the syntax itself conveys meaning that composes with the meaning contributed by the verb. The roots of this theoretical split are traced to differing perspectives on polysemy, and a partial synthesis of the two perspectives is proposed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 208-229
Author(s):  
Elena V. Zheltova ◽  
◽  
Alexander Ju. Zheltov ◽  
◽  

The article attempts, firstly, to critically analyze the traditional order of cases in Latin, secondly, to discover an internal mechanism that brings the elements of a paradigm together, and thirdly, to present a new model of the nominal and pronominal case paradigms in Latin. The authors develop the idea that the crucial role in structuring a case paradigm belongs to morphemic syncretism. The syncretism is treated as a systemic phenomenon of morpheme neutralization rather than a result of phonetic reduction. In the paradigm built on this principle, the cases marked with the same endings necessarily take adjacent positions. There is a certain correlation between the morphemic syncretism and the semantics of cases extensively exemplified in the Latin literature. Taking this as reference point, the authors establish a formally motivated paradigmatic order of cases and single out a set of semantic features that shape the case paradigm. This method enables authors to find the non-contradictory paradigmatic positions for both the core and the “marginal” cases (vocative and locative). Applied to the pronominal cases, however, it reveals the significant discrepancy between the nominal and pronominal paradigms concerning two cases — nominative and genitive. The pronominal nominative’s special status is determined by its pragmatic rather than syntactic functions, which is typical for pro-drop languages. The genitive case appears in three different forms that originate from the possessive pronouns and correspond to the three basic functions of the genitive — possessive, objective, and partitive ones. Such transparadigmatic syncretism brings together the paradigms of personal and possessive pronouns, which are related by nature. The approach suggested in this study makes it possible to present in a new way the nominal and pronominal case paradigms, to demonstrate in what points they differ from each other, and to highlight some functional and semantic features of the particular cases.


2018 ◽  
Vol 140 (4) ◽  
pp. 458-488
Author(s):  
Daniela Fuhrmann

Abstract This article discusses in detail the figure of Gurnemanz who, in book III of ›Parzival‹, acts as the hero’s teacher in courtly behaviour. By analysing the episode in its immediate context, I expose selfish tendencies leading Gurnemanz’s guidance, tendencies which, together with further features, link Gurnemanz to other advisors in the novel. His education can thus be seen not only as a fundamental part of the novel’s syntagmatic, but also of its paradigmatic structure. I show that – in comparison to Chrétien – Wolfram’s narration problematises the topic ›zuht and rât‹, underlining the ambiguities in his teaching figures. This shift, in the end, supports the idea of an individuated hero.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document