Wormhole inducing inflation in Kaluza–Klein cosmology

We present wormhole as a solution of Euclidean field equations as well as the solution of Wheeler–DeWitt equation in (4 + 1)-dimensional Kaluza–Klein cosmology minimally coupled with scalar field. A simple analytic solution of the Euclidean field equations enlightens classical forbidden domain in the wormhole configuration under analytic continuation in the Euclidean space by [Formula: see text]. Numerical solutions of the field equations allow wormhole configuration with some standard potentials. The wormhole solution triggers decay of potential and reduction of internal space. Cosmic evolution of a wormhole shows an inflationary era away from the classical forbidden domain introducing aforesaid analytic continuation. Analytic and numerical solution of the Wheeler–DeWitt equation also supports Hawking–Page wormhole boundary conditions.

Examples of reflection positive field theories

The requirement of reflection positivity (RP) for Euclidean field theories is considered. This is done for the cases of a scalar field, a higher derivative scalar field theory and the scalar field theory defined on a non-integer dimensional space (NIDS). It is shown that regarding RP, the analytical structure of the corresponding Schwinger functions plays an important role. For the higher derivative scalar field theory, RP does not hold. However for the scalar field theory on a NIDS, RP holds in a certain range of dimensions where the corresponding Minkowskian field is defined on a Hilbert space with a positive definite scalar product that provides a unitary representation of the Poincaré group. In addition, and motivated by the last example, it is shown that, under certain conditions, one can construct non-local reflection positive Euclidean field theories starting from the corrected two point functions of interacting local field theories.

Wormhole in 5D Kaluza–Klein cosmology

We present wormhole as a solution of Euclidean field equations as well as the solution of the Wheeler–deWitt (WD) equation satisfying Hawking–Page wormhole boundary conditions in (4 + 1)-dimensional Kaluza–Klein cosmology. The wormholes are considered in the cases of pure gravity, minimally coupled scalar (imaginary) field and with a positive cosmological constant assuming dynamical extra-dimensional space. In above cases, wormholes are allowed both from Euclidean field equations and WD equation. The dimensional reduction is possible.

CONSTRUCTIVE GEOMETRY AND THE PARALLEL POSTULATE

Euclidean geometry, as presented by Euclid, consists of straightedge-and-compass constructions and rigorous reasoning about the results of those constructions. We show that Euclidean geometry can be developed using only intuitionistic logic. This involves finding “uniform” constructions where normally a case distinction is used. For example, in finding a perpendicular to line L through point p, one usually uses two different constructions, “erecting” a perpendicular when p is on L, and “dropping” a perpendicular when p is not on L, but in constructive geometry, it must be done without a case distinction. Classically, the models of Euclidean (straightedge-and-compass) geometry are planes over Euclidean fields. We prove a similar theorem for constructive Euclidean geometry, by showing how to define addition and multiplication without a case distinction about the sign of the arguments. With intuitionistic logic, there are two possible definitions of Euclidean fields, which turn out to correspond to different versions of the parallel postulate.We consider three versions of Euclid’s parallel postulate. The two most important are Euclid’s own formulation in his Postulate 5, which says that under certain conditions two lines meet, and Playfair’s axiom (dating from 1795), which says there cannot be two distinct parallels to line L through the same point p. These differ in that Euclid 5 makes an existence assertion, while Playfair’s axiom does not. The third variant, which we call the strong parallel postulate, isolates the existence assertion from the geometry: it amounts to Playfair’s axiom plus the principle that two distinct lines that are not parallel do intersect. The first main result of this paper is that Euclid 5 suffices to define coordinates, addition, multiplication, and square roots geometrically.We completely settle the questions about implications between the three versions of the parallel postulate. The strong parallel postulate easily implies Euclid 5, and Euclid 5 also implies the strong parallel postulate, as a corollary of coordinatization and definability of arithmetic. We show that Playfair does not imply Euclid 5, and we also give some other independence results. Our independence proofs are given without discussing the exact choice of the other axioms of geometry; all we need is that one can interpret the geometric axioms in Euclidean field theory. The independence proofs use Kripke models of Euclidean field theories based on carefully constructed rings of real-valued functions. “Field elements” in these models are real-valued functions.

Some comments on infinities on quantum field theory: A functional integral approach

We analyze on the formalism of probabilities measures-functional integrals on function space the problem of infinities on Euclidean field theories. We also clarify and generalize our previous published studies on the subject.