What do people with lung cancer and stroke expect from patient navigation? A qualitative study in Germany

ObjectiveThis qualitative study investigated patients’ needs and wishes in relation to patient navigation.DesignA qualitative interview study was conducted. Participants were invited to take part in three in-depth interviews over a period of 6–12 months. Thematic analysis was used.SettingInterviewees were sought in the Berlin metropolitan area of Germany in academic university hospitals, in rehabilitation clinics and through self-help organisations.ParticipantsThe sample consisted of individuals diagnosed with lung cancer (n=20) or stroke (n=20).ResultsFrom the perspective of interviewees, patient navigators should function as consistent contact persons, present during the whole care trajectory. Their role would be to guide patients through an often confusing healthcare landscape, offering practical, advisory and emotional assistance corresponding to patients’ needs. The study shows that—independent of the disease—participants had similar expectations and needs regarding support from navigators.ConclusionFor chronic and complex diseases—as is the case with lung cancer and stroke—it appears less important for navigators to fulfil disease-specific tasks. Rather, they should ensure that patients’ more general needs, in relation to social, practical and emotional support, are met in a way that suits their individual wishes. Following these results, patient navigation programmes might be designed to include generic elements, which should then be adapted to the infrastructure in a particular healthcare region and to the particularities of a specific healthcare system.

Estimating the impact of neonatal abstinence system interventions on Medicaid: an incremental cost analysis

Background Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) incidence has significantly increased in the US in recent years. It is therefore important to develop effective intervention protocols that mitigate the long-term consequences of this condition for the mother, her child, and the community. Methods We used Monte Carlo simulation to estimate the impact of four interventions for NAS and their combinations on pregnant women with opioid use disorder. The key outputs were changes in incremental costs from baseline from the Medicaid perspective and from a total systems perspective and effect size changes. Simulation parameters and costs were based on the literature and baseline model validation was performed using Medicaid claims for Indiana. Results Compared to baseline, the resulting simulation estimates showed that three interventions significantly decreased Medicaid incremental costs by 8% (mandatory opioid testing (MOT)), 4% (patient navigators), and 3% (peer recovery coaches). The combination of the three interventions reduced Medicaid direct costs by 26%. Reductions were similar for total system incremental costs (ranging from 2 to 24%), though MOT was found to increase costs of overdose death based on productivity loss. NAS case reductions ranged from 1% (capacity change) to 13% (MOT). Conclusions Using systems-based modeling, we showed that costs associated with NAS can be significantly reduced. However, effective implementation would require the involvement and coordination of several stakeholders. In addition, careful protocols for MOT should be considered to ensure pregnant women don’t forgo prenatal care for fear of punitive consequences.

“I think like if Albert Einstein and Superman had a baby, that's what it would take”: The experiences and perceptions of community and hospital healthcare professionals in a seniors’ patient navigator program

Introduction The success of new patient navigation programs have mostly been described from the perspectives of patient outcomes. Little is known about how patient navigators interact with healthcare professionals in the community and in hospital settings. Methods A qualitative study using a phenomenological analysis was undertaken to depict the lived experiences of Ontario (Canada) healthcare providers who have interacted with a patient navigator. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 42 healthcare professionals, including frontline care providers ( n = 25) and administrators ( n = 16) from hospital ( n = 21) and community care settings ( n = 21). Results Participants’ experiences were reflected in one overarching theme: role clarity and three emergent themes related to the overarching theme: (i) concerns over accountability of patient care (ii) trust (iii) attainable-but-not. Participants described an inconsistent understanding of the role of patient navigators which led to uncertainty regarding their role in patient care. The current nature of the healthcare system influenced participants’ belief in the sustainability of patient navigation model of care. Despite these experiences, participants felt that patient navigators could help healthcare providers care for patients by preventing potential crises from developing and enhancing their knowledge about services. Discussion This study expands our understanding of patient navigation programs by exploring the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals, thereby providing new perspectives into components that support the successful health outcomes of older adults being supported by a patient navigator. The implications of findings for research, clinical practice, and policy are described.

Can Patient Navigators Help Potential TB Patients Navigate the Diagnostic and Treatment Pathways? An Implementation Research from India

Navigating the Indian health system is a challenge for people with tuberculosis (TB) symptoms. The onus of organizing care is on the patient and their families alone. Factors like gender discrimination and opportunity costs further aggravate this. As a result, people may not complete the diagnostic and treatment pathway even though they experience poor health. Navigators can aid in the pathway’s completion. We implemented two projects in India—a public sector intervention in Bihar, with a population of 1.02 million, and a private sector intervention in Andhra Pradesh (AP), with a population of 8.45 million. Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) of the public health system in Bihar and local field officers in AP facilitated the patients’ navigation through the health system. In Bihar, ASHAs accompanied community-identified presumptive TB patients to the nearest primary health center, assisted them through the diagnostic process, and supported the patients throughout the TB treatment. In AP, the field officers liaised with the private physicians, accompanied presumptive patients through the diagnosis, counseled and started treatment, and followed-up with the patients during the treatment. Both projects recorded case-based data for all of the patients, and used the yield and historical TB notifications to evaluate the intervention’s effect. Between July 2017 and December 2018, Bihar confirmed 1650 patients, which represented an increase of 94% in public notifications compared to the baseline. About 97% of them started treatment. During the same period in AP, private notifications increased by 147% compared to the baseline, and all 5765 patients started treatment. Patient navigators support the patients in the diagnostic and treatment pathways, and improve their health system experience. This novel approach of involving navigators in TB projects can improve the completion of the care cascade and reduce the loss to follow-up at various stages.

The role of patient navigators in ambulatory care: overview of systematic reviews

Background Patient navigators have been introduced across various countries to enable timely access to healthcare services and to ensure completion of diagnosis and follow-up of care. There is an increasing evidence on the the role of patient navigation for patients and healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to analyse the evidence on patient navigation interventions in ambulatory care and to evaluate their effects on individuals and health system outcomes. Methods An overview of reviews was conducted, following a prespecified protocol. All patients in ambulatory care or transitional care setting were included in this review as long as it was related to the role of patient navigators. The study analysed patient navigators covering a wide range of health professionals such as physicians, nurses, pharmacists, social workers and lay health workers or community-based workers with no or very limited training. Studies including patient-related measures and health system-related outcomes were eligible for inclusion. A rigorous search was performed in multiple data bases. After reaching a high inter-rater agreement of 0.86, title and abstract screening was independently performed. Of an initial 14,248 search results and an additional 62 articles identified through the snowballing approach, a total of 7159 hits were eligible for title/abstract screening. 679 articles were included for full-text screening. Results Eleven systematic reviews were included covering various patient navigation intervention in cancer care, disease screening, transitional care and for various chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Nine systematic reviews primarily tailored services to ethnic minorities or other disadvantaged groups. Patient navigators performed tasks such as providing education and counselling, translations, home visits, outreach, scheduling of appointments and follow-up. Eight reviews identified positive outcomes in expanding access to care, in particular for vulnerable patient groups. Two reviews on patient navigation in transitional care reported improved patient outcomes, hospital readmission rates and mixed evidence on quality of life and emergency department visits. Two reviews demonstrated improved patient outcomes for persons with various chronic conditions and multimorbidity. Conclusions Patient navigators were shown to expand access to screenings and health services for vulnerable patients or population groups with chronic conditions who tend to underuse health services.

Assessing effectiveness of a self-guided training program for oncology financial advocates.

271 Background: Financial toxicity can be a devastating side effect for patients with cancer and their families, and may impact access to and delivery of care, treatment compliance, and outcomes. Financial advocates mitigate financial toxicity for patients and their families, liaise between payers/providers/pharmacies/patients, support shared decision-making and care planning processes through provision of cost and coverage information, and mitigate institutional financial toxicity. Training on effective financial navigation interventions, financial health literacy, patient engagement, oncology fundamentals, and measurement of impact is critical for advocates. Methods: The Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Financial Advocacy Boot Camp is a self-paced eLearning program consisting of 9 modules designed to build knowledge and skills of financial advocates. Users interact with education across two levels within the ACCC Learning Management System. To evaluate effectiveness of this content, pre- and post-assessments and evaluation forms for registered learners from 1/1/2020 to 12/31/20 were exported and exploratory analysis was performed on this data set of 538 participants. Results: 51% of respondents are oncology financial advocates; 7% are industry representatives; and the remaining 42% are a mix of patient navigators, nurse navigators, social workers, pharmacists, APPs, and nurses. 363 participants fully completed at least one of two levels. Most participants agreed or strongly agreed that each of the modules improved their knowledge and skills: 94% increased their ability to incorporate effective screening methods to identify patients at risk of financial toxicity, 95% are better able to review the evolving landscape of health insurance provided by public and private payers, and 97% both increased their ability to find patient assistance programs and resources for patients and can describe how to guide patients through the process of improving insurance coverage. 79% identified specific examples of what they will do differently after the training, including implementing screening and follow-up protocols, adjusting communication approaches with patients, proposing quality improvement projects, and accessing resources. Conclusions: Training, such as the Financial Advocacy Boot Camp, that builds knowledge and skills in financial screening, communication, and navigation can help cancer programs improve staffs’ ability to mitigate patient and institutional financial toxicity. Future research efforts should further define financial advocacy competencies, measure patient and institutional impact of financial navigation interventions, and assess effective practices for implementation of financial advocacy training in cancer programs.

The Center for Surgical Health: A Compassion-Driven Urban Surgical Mission

We are the Center for Surgical Health (CSH), an academic community partnership that supports, educates, and advocates for vulnerable Philadelphians with surgical diseases, founded in 2016 by Dr. Jon B. Morris, a leader in surgical education and a general surgeon at the University of Pennsylvania, and Dr. Alan Herbst, a current third-year Penn general surgery resident. At the time, Dr. Morris, raised in a Reform Jewish household, had been participating in an RCIA Program to convert to Catholicism. The mission of providing surgery to uninsured patients, primarily undocumented individuals, by helping them obtain insurance and see Penn providers was seen by Dr. Morris as a form of Catholic charity, which he has continued to remain dedicated to as his faith in Jesus Christ has deepened. Dr. Herbst, now Associate Director of Clinics for the CSH, recalls working with Dr. Morris as a sub-intern during his conversion, beginning with passion and a neon poster board inviting people to “See the Surgeon.” Since that time, the CSH has grown from an organization with 10 volunteers, called “personal patient navigators,” who provide insurance support and advocacy at every step of the perioperative continuum, to one with over 50, who have now seen 156 patients and assisted in providing 49 needed procedures. Much of this growth has been brought about through the dedication and vision of Dr. Matthew Goldshore, the Deputy Director of the CSH and a fifth-year Penn general surgery resident, as well as Dr. Carrie Z. Morales, Associate Deputy Director of the CSH and a recent Perelman School of Medicine graduate. Through their leadership, and the talent and commitment of other members of the CSH board, overseen by Director Dr. Morris, the CSH now has policy and research divisions, a surgical equity curriculum, and continues to develop new ways of providing better care.

A User-Centered Need Analysis of Cancer Patient Navigation — An Intersection of Collaborative Work and Collaborative Health IT

Cancer care is becoming more complex each year, making the patient’s path to, and through the care continuum confusing and daunting. Patient-navigation programs for cancer patients have grown in recent years, but their navigation support is fragmented in many ways and often incomplete, lessening their effectiveness. Digital tools to support the cancer patient navigator can make them more effective and allow more patients to receive navigation support. A multifaceted analysis of the needs for such tools is presented. The analysis methods include literature review, domain analysis, and qualitative interviews with a sample of ten cancer patient navigators.

Status of Cancer Care at Network Sites of the Nation’s Academic Cancer Centers

Background: Cancer care coordination across major academic medical centers and their networks is evolving rapidly, but the spectrum of organizational efforts has not been described. We conducted a mixed-methods survey of leading cancer centers and their networks to document care coordination and identify opportunities to improve geographically dispersed care. Methods: A mixed-methods survey was sent to 91 cancer centers in the United States and Canada. We analyzed the number and locations of network sites; access to electronic medical records (EMRs); clinical research support and participation at networks; use of patient navigators, care paths, and quality measures; and physician workforce. Responses were collected via Qualtrics software between September 2017 and December 2018. Results: Of the 69 responding cancer centers, 74% were NCI-designated. Eighty-seven percent of respondents were part of a matrix health system, and 13% were freestanding. Fifty-six reported having network sites. Forty-three respondents use navigators for disease-specific populations, and 24 use them for all patients. Thirty-five respondents use ≥1 types of care path. Fifty-seven percent of networks had complete, integrated access to their main center’s EMRs. Thirty-nine respondents said the main center provides funding for clinical research at networks, with 22 reporting the main center provides all funding. Thirty-five said the main center provided pharmacy support at the networks, with 15 indicating the main center provides 100% pharmacy support. Certification program participation varied extensively across networks. Conclusions: The data show academic cancer centers have extensive involvement in network cancer care, often extending into rural communities. Coordinating care through improved clinical trial access and greater use of patient navigation, care paths, coordinated EMRs, and quality measures is likely to improve patient outcomes. Although it is premature to draw firm conclusions, the survey results are appropriate for mapping next steps and data queries.