stimulus repetition rate
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

27
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 248-254
Author(s):  
Susmi Pani ◽  
Archita Sahoo ◽  
Indranil Chatterjee ◽  
Palash Dutta

Introduction The effects of increasing stimulus repetition rate on the ABR using click stimuli have been investigated in normal and hearing impaired subjects with neurologic abnormality but there is limited study on the effect of stimulus repetition rate on ABR using chirp stimuli. The present study aims to compare the chirp evoked auditory brainstem responses with reference to changes in latency of peaks, interaural latency differences and interwave latency intervals as a function of rate and compare those responses with the  click evoked auditory brainstem responses, in normal hearing subjects. Materials and Methods Total 30 normally hearing adults were considered for this study. All participants were screened for normal hearing sensitivity upto 8 kHz in pure tone audiometry for middle ear pathology and central auditory processing disorder. Four parameters of ABR were considered to assess in this study including absolute latency, interwave latency intervals, latency-rate function and interaural latency. ABR was done based on the protocol of this study. Results Results revealed that there was a significant difference in the absolute latency and interwave intervals when the stimulus repetition rate was increased. Conclusion The latencies of wave III and V increases and waveform morphology changed as the stimulus repetition rate increased above 20/sec. The absolute latency of wave III and V was found to be shorter than clicks and can be used especially in newborn hearing evaluation assuming in shorter time window.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 1039-1042
Author(s):  
Mohd Normani Zakaria ◽  
Rosninda Abdullah ◽  
Nik Adilah Nik Othman

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (09) ◽  
pp. 725-738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Cebulla ◽  
Ekkehard Stürzebecher ◽  
Claus Elberling ◽  
Jochen Müller

The click stimulus generally used for newborn hearing screening generates a traveling wave along the basilar membrane, which excites each of the frequency bands in the cochlea, one after another. Due to the lack in synchronization of the excitations, the summated response amplitude is low. A repetitive click-like stimulus can be set up in the frequency domain by adding a high number of cosines, the frequency intervals of which comply with the desired stimulus repetition rate. Straight-forward compensation of the cochlear traveling wave delay is possible with a stimulus of this type. As a result, better synchronization of the neural excitation can be obtained so that higher response amplitudes can be expected. The additional introduction of a frequency offset enables the use of a q-sample test for response detection. The results of investigations carried out on a large group of normal-hearing test subjects have confirmed the enhanced efficiency of this stimulus design. The new stimuli lead to significantly higher response SNRs and thus higher detection rates and shorter detection times. Using band-limited stimuli designed in the same manner, a “frequency-specific” hearing screening seems to be possible. El estímulo click, generalmente usado para el tamizaje auditivo de recién nacidos, genera una onda viajera a lo largo de la membrana basilar que estimula cada una de las bandas de frecuencia en la cóclea, una después de la otra. Debido a una falta de sincronización en la estimulación, la amplitud de la respuesta sumada es baja. Se puede establecer un estímulo repetitivo tipo clic en el dominio de frecuencia por medio de la adición de un alto número de cosenos, los intervalos de frecuencia que cumplen con la tasa deseada de repetición de estímulos. Es posible una compensación directa del retardo en la onda viajera coclear con un estímulo de este tipo. Como resultado, se puede obtener una mejor sincronización de la excitación neural, por lo que pueden esperarse amplitudes de respuesta mayores. La introducción adicional de una frecuencia que contrarreste permite el uso de una prueba de muestra “q” para detección de la respuesta. Los resultados de investigaciones realizadas en grandes grupos de sujetos con audición normal han confirmado la eficiencia aumentada de este diseño de estímulo. Los nuevos estímulos llevan a una SNR de respuesta significativamente más alto y por ende, a tasas mayores de detección y a tiempos menores de detección. Utilizando estímulos de banda limitada diseñados de la misma forma, un tamizaje auditivo frecuenciaespecífico parece posible.


2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (03) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Denise A. Tucker ◽  
Susan Dietrich ◽  
Stacy Harris ◽  
Sarah Pelletier

The effects of stimulus rate and gender on the auditory middle latency response (AMLR) waveforms were examined in 20 young adult male and female subjects. Four different repetition rates were presented to subjects (1.1/sec, 4.1/sec, 7.7/sec, and 11.3/sec). Stimulus repetition rate had a significant effect on Pa latency, Pa amplitude, and Pb amplitude. Pa and Pb amplitudes decreased with increasing the stimulus rate, and Pa latency significantly increased with increasing the stimulus rate. No significant differences were seen on Pb latency or site of recording. Gender had a significant effect on Pa latency and Pa amplitude. Pa latencies were longer in male subjects, and Pa amplitudes were larger in female subjects. Gender did not have a significant effect on the Pb waveform.


Cephalalgia ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 873-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
PS Sándor ◽  
KI Roon ◽  
MD Ferrari ◽  
JG van Dijk ◽  
J Schoenen

Data on repeatability and optimal settings are needed when studying the influence of drugs on the intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials (IDAP). IDAP was recorded at intervals of 1, 2, and 24 h at two centers in 22 healthy volunteers. Settings were modified to compare fixed versus randomly varied stimulus repetition rate, as well as 30 Hz and 100 Hz low pass filters. Repeatability was assessed for different intervals and different settings. Group means did not differ between centers, the 2-h or 24-h retest, or when using different settings. We observed an order effect for the 1 h retest. Fixed repetition rate and the 30 Hz filter improved repeatability with still high intraindividual variability. IDAP group means can be compared between centers for retest intervals of 2 h and 24 h and different settings. Variability is too large to compare individuals.


1998 ◽  
Vol 201 (20) ◽  
pp. 2879-2890 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Coro ◽  
M Pérez ◽  
E Mora ◽  
D Boada ◽  
WE Conner ◽  
...  

Moths of both sexes of Empyreuma affinis (=pugione) and Syntomeida epilais (Arctiidae, Ctenuchinae), Maenas jussiae (Arctiidae, Arctiinae) and Spodoptera frugiperda (Noctuidae, Amphipyrinae) were studied. Spike activity in the A1 cell was recorded using a stainless-steel hook electrode from the tympanic nerve in the mesothorax. Acoustic stimuli consisting of 25 and 100 ms pulses at the best frequency for the species and at intensities that evoke A1 cell saturation response were used at repetition rates of 0.5 and 5 Hz for 100 ms stimuli, and between 2 and 20 Hz for 25 ms stimuli. Stimuli at a repetition rate corresponding to a duty cycle of 5 % (25 ms at 2 Hz and 100 ms at 0.5 Hz) did not evoke monotonic changes in the responses of the A1 cell. With 25 ms pulses, rates above 5 Hz evoked an exponential decrease in the number of spikes and an increase in the latency of the responses of all the 37 specimens tested. The response duration showed no apparent change with stimulus repetition rates even at the highest duty cycle used (50 %), i.e. 25 ms at 20 Hz and 100 ms at 5 Hz. The higher the rate of stimulus repetition, the more marked were the changes in the A1 cell responses. In 16 of 17 preparations from two species, habituation had no effect on the adaptation rate in each response, while in seven of eight specimens of another species, the adaptation rate decreased with stimulus repetition. These results, and those from another mechanoreceptor cell, indicate that receptor cell adaptation (changes evoked in the response by a stimulus of constant intensity) and habituation (changes in the responses due to stimulus repetition rate) are two distinctive phenomena. The A1 cell in its habituated state showed an increase in its response to incremental increases in stimulus intensity of 10 dB. This result supports the idea that receptor cell habituation does not seem to be due to fatigue, i.e. to a temporary loss of the ability to respond to stimulation induced in a sensory receptor by continued stimulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document