Genomic Selection for Wheat Blast in a Diversity Panel, Breeding Panel and Full-Sibs Panel

Wheat blast is an emerging threat to wheat production, due to its recent migration to South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. Because genomic selection (GS) has emerged as a promising breeding strategy, the key objective of this study was to evaluate it for wheat blast phenotyped at precision phenotyping platforms in Quirusillas (Bolivia), Okinawa (Bolivia) and Jashore (Bangladesh) using three panels: (i) a diversity panel comprising 172 diverse spring wheat genotypes, (ii) a breeding panel comprising 248 elite breeding lines, and (iii) a full-sibs panel comprising 298 full-sibs. We evaluated two genomic prediction models (the genomic best linear unbiased prediction or GBLUP model and the Bayes B model) and compared the genomic prediction accuracies with accuracies from a fixed effects model (with selected blast-associated markers as fixed effects), a GBLUP + fixed effects model and a pedigree relationships-based model (ABLUP). On average, across all the panels and environments analyzed, the GBLUP + fixed effects model (0.63 ± 0.13) and the fixed effects model (0.62 ± 0.13) gave the highest prediction accuracies, followed by the Bayes B (0.59 ± 0.11), GBLUP (0.55 ± 0.1), and ABLUP (0.48 ± 0.06) models. The high prediction accuracies from the fixed effects model resulted from the markers tagging the 2NS translocation that had a large effect on blast in all the panels. This implies that in environments where the 2NS translocation-based blast resistance is effective, genotyping one to few markers tagging the translocation is sufficient to predict the blast response and genome-wide markers may not be needed. We also observed that marker-assisted selection (MAS) based on a few blast-associated markers outperformed GS as it selected the highest mean percentage (88.5%) of lines also selected by phenotypic selection and discarded the highest mean percentage of lines (91.8%) also discarded by phenotypic selection, across all panels. In conclusion, while this study demonstrates that MAS might be a powerful strategy to select for the 2NS translocation-based blast resistance, we emphasize that further efforts to use genomic tools to identify non-2NS translocation-based blast resistance are critical.

Soil supplementation with Si, B and Zn and their synergetic effects in reducing severity of wheat blast (Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum)

Wheat blast (Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum) in Bangladesh and South America is recognized as one major limiting factor of wheat production. Its control using chemical pesticides raises concerns about food safety and pesticide resistance, which have dictated the need for alternative blast management approach, nutrient supplementation could be an ecofriendly alternative. Experiments were carried out under confined net house condition for two consecutive cropping seasons. Single doses of the nutrients (Si, B and Zn) were incorporated during soil preparation. Plants of the wheat blast susceptible variety BARI Gom-26 were inoculated with spores (1 x 107 spores ml-1) of Magnaporthe oryzae Triticum at blast vulnerable pre-heading stage of 52 days age. Typical wheat blast symptoms of spike bleaching from top to downward appeared on sight 14 days after inoculation i.e., 66 days age of the crop. Incidence and severity of blast bleaching of spike were scored for four times starting from 68 days age @ three day’s interval. None of the nutrients could stop the incidence of blast on wheat; however, some nutrients reduced the blast incidence significantly. Solo application of Si, B and Zn or combination of two caused significant reduction of spike bleaching. With the mixed application of Si, B and Zn, > 47% reduction of wheat blast severity was obtained. The results revealed that the soil application of silicon, zinc and boron had a synergistic effect on the intensity of blast disease of wheat. Int. J. Agril. Res. Innov. Tech. 11(2): 76-84, Dec 2021

New Genotypes and Genomic Regions for Resistance to Wheat Blast in South Asian Germplasm

Wheat blast (WB) disease, since its first identification in Bangladesh in 2016, is now an established serious threat to wheat production in South Asia. There is a need for sound knowledge about resistance sources and associated genomic regions to assist breeding programs. Hence, a panel of genotypes from India and Bangladesh was evaluated for wheat blast resistance and a genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed. Disease evaluation was done during five crop seasons—at precision phenotyping platform (PPPs) for wheat blast disease at Jashore (2018–19), Quirusillas (2018–19 and 2019–20) and Okinawa (2019 and 2020). Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) across the genome were obtained using DArTseq genotyping-by-sequencing platform, and in total 5713 filtered markers were used. GWAS revealed 40 significant markers associated with WB resistance, of which 33 (82.5%) were in the 2NS/2AS chromosome segment and one each on seven chromosomes (3B, 3D, 4A, 5A, 5D, 6A and 6B). The 2NS markers contributed significantly in most of the environments, explaining an average of 33.4% of the phenotypic variation. Overall, 22.4% of the germplasm carried 2NS/2AS segment. So far, 2NS translocation is the only effective WB resistance source being used in the breeding programs of South Asia. Nevertheless, the identification of non-2NS/2AS genomic regions for WB resistance provides a hope to broaden and diversify resistance for this disease in years to come.

Taxonomic and pathogenic diversity of the blast pathogen populations infecting wheat and grasses in Minas Gerais

The blast disease of Poaceae is caused by a large species complex, among which P. oryzae is composed of several host-specialized lineages. The Pyricularia oryzae Triticum pathotype (PoT) causes the blast disease in wheat, but is also capable of infecting other grasses, which may serve as an inoculum reservoir for epidemics in wheat. In Brazil, severe wheat blast epidemics are most common in the Cerrado region. The dominant hypothesis is that signal grass (Urochloa sp.) and other gramineous plants harbor the wheat blast pathogen, thus serving as a major reservoir of inoculum for epidemics in wheat. A two-year survey of the Pyricularia blast pathogens was conducted in both wheat and non-wheat areas as well as prior (February) and during (May) the wheat growing season in Minas Gerais. A total of 1,368 plant samples representative of 31 Poaceae species, including wheat, were collected and inspected for the presence of blast symptoms. During the isolations, 932 isolates were obtained, being one fourth obtained from gramineous plants. A subset of 572 isolates was selected for identification at the species level based on portions of the CH7-BAC9 gene sequences. Most of the isolates (n = 494) were P. oryzae, within which 68% were PoT and 32% non-PoT based on two PCR assays targeting (MoT3 and C17 PCR assays). The PoT lineage was found predominantly (97%) in wheat and rarely in the other hosts, even nearby wheat fields (2.1%), as well as at longer distances from wheat regions (0.1%). The blast pathogen population isolated from signal grass grouped in different clades from PoT, and therefore referred to Urochloa lineage (PoU). A series of cross-inoculation greenhouse experiments was conducted using wheat (cv. BRS Guamirim and BR 18-Terena) and signal grass (cv. Marandu) as host and 14 PoT and six PoU isolates as pathogen factor. In the first leaf-inoculation experiment, results showed a significant interaction between host and pathogen; PoT was strongly/weakly aggressive towards wheat/signal grass and PoU was strongly/weakly aggressive towards signal grass/wheat. In inoculated wheat heads, PoT was more aggressive (>91% infected spikelets) than PoU (52% infected spikelets). In a third experiment, four signal grass cultivars (Marandu, Basilisk, Piatã, and Xaraés) were inoculated with the same set of 20 isolates. Similarly, signal grass cultivars were generally more susceptible to PoU than PoT. Severity induced by PoU was twice (7.7% severity) as high as PoT (3.8%) and so was the number of conidia/leaf produced by PoU (47,500) and PoT (23,200). Two groups of signal grass cultivars were formed, the most susceptible composed of Marandu and Basilisk and the least susceptible composed of Piatã and Xaraés. Results of our study confirm the host-specialization and the shaping of the blast populations according to the host. We further suggest that grasses in general, especially signal grass, may not play a major role as an inoculum reservoir for PoT, as it harbors mainly the PoU population. However, due to the large extent of pasture-growing regions and cross-infection ability in wheat, signal grass may harbor amounts of PoT inoculum that are sufficient for initiating leaf and head blast epidemics in wheat blast in Minas Gerais state.

Towards an early warning system for wheat blast: epidemiological basis and model development

Wheat blast is caused by the fungus Pyricularia oryzae Triticum pathotype (PoT). Significantly damaging wheat blast epidemics are sporadic and limited to tropical wheat growing areas in South America. Unexpectedly, wheat blast was reported in Bangladesh and Zambia in 2016 and 2020, respectively. The urgent need to deal with a poorly studied disease has mobilized the scientific community. Original research and reviews have been published in various venues. Nevertheless, disease control is still a difficult task. Much less research has, however, focused on crucially important and complex ecological interactions at the field, landscape, or regional levels. This chapter reviews aspects of the epidemiology of wheat blast, mainly those related to inoculum and its role for the epidemics. It then describes the models that have been developed by the authors as well as the decision support system. Examples of the implementation of a warning system in Bangladesh and Brazil are also illustrated.

Wheat Blast: A Disease Spreading by Intercontinental Jumps and Its Management Strategies

Wheat blast (WB) caused by Magnaporthe oryzae pathotype Triticum (MoT) is an important fungal disease in tropical and subtropical wheat production regions. The disease was initially identified in Brazil in 1985, and it subsequently spread to some major wheat-producing areas of the country as well as several South American countries such as Bolivia, Paraguay, and Argentina. In recent years, WB has been introduced to Bangladesh and Zambia via international wheat trade, threatening wheat production in South Asia and Southern Africa with the possible further spreading in these two continents. Resistance source is mostly limited to 2NS carriers, which are being eroded by newly emerged MoT isolates, demonstrating an urgent need for identification and utilization of non-2NS resistance sources. Fungicides are also being heavily relied on to manage WB that resulted in increasing fungal resistance, which should be addressed by utilization of new fungicides or rotating different fungicides. Additionally, quarantine measures, cultural practices, non-fungicidal chemical treatment, disease forecasting, biocontrol etc., are also effective components of integrated WB management, which could be used in combination with varietal resistance and fungicides to obtain reasonable management of this disease.