Dynamics of dissipative self-gravitating source in Rastall gravity

The dynamics of dissipative gravitational collapse of a source is explored in Rastall gravity. The field equations are derived for the geometry and collapsing matter. The dynamical equations are formulated for the heat flux and diffusion approximation. The heat transportation equation is derived by using Müller–Israel–Stewart approach to investigate the effects of heat flux on the collapsing source. Moreover, an equation is found by combining the dynamical and heat transport equation, the consequences of this equation are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the Rastall parameter [Formula: see text] effect is analyzed for the collapse of sphere.

Using Journal Impact Factor to Assess Scholarly Records: Overcorrecting for the Potter Stewart Approach to Promotion and Tenure

Promotion and tenure decisions frequently require an assessment of the quality of a candidate’s research record. Without carefully specifying what constitutes a tenurable and promotable record, departments frequently adopt the Potter Stewart approach – they know it when they see it. The benefit of such a system is that it allows for multiple paths to tenure and promotion and encourages holistic review, but the drawback is that it allows for the promotion and tenure process to be more easily manipulated by favoritism and bias. Incorporating transparent metrics such as journal impact factor (JIF) would seem like a good way to standardize the process. We argue, however, that when JIF becomes determinative, conceptual disadvantages and systematic biases are introduced into the process. JIF indicates the visibility or utility of a journal; it does not and cannot tell us about individual articles published in that journal. Moreover, it creates inequitable paths to tenure on the basis of gender and subfield, given gendered patterns of publications and the variation in journal economies by subfield.

PENDEKATAN STEWART DALAM pH DARAH YANG MENDASARI ASIDOSIS METABOLIK

Metabolic acidosis is the most frequent acid-base disorder in patients of the Intensive Care Unit. By conventional approach based onpH value, [HCO3–], and base deficit (BD) from blood gas analyzer (BGA) measurement are often inappropriate with the clinical stateand inadequate in explaining the mechanism of the metabolic acidosis. The Stewart approach states that the blood pH is determinedby a strong ion difference (SID), the carbon dioxide tension (pCO2), the total concentration of non-volatile weak acid. The Stewartapproach may give a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the metabolic acidosis. The purpose of this study is to knowthe correlation of blood pH value measurement from BGA and calculation based on Stewart approach and identifying the mechanismsthat underlie a metabolic acidosis. In this study an analytic observational cross-sectional method was used. The examined subjectsconsisted of 71 patients who were admitted with a metabolic acidosis at the ICU from July up to August 2007. All patients were measuredfor their blood pH, pCO2, [HCO3–], BD, sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, chloride, lactate, albumin, and phosphate. The resultwas reported as the mean and standard deviation. The data were analyzed by Pearson’s correlation test and linier multiple regression.Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05. The mean values of blood pH measurement from BGA and blood pH calculationbased on the Stewart approach were 7.33 (0.11) and 7.49 (0.11) (r = 0.681; p < 0.001). Most patients had two underlying mechanisms ofmetabolic acidosis. Hyperlactatemia was present in 61.8%, hyperchloremia was present in 58.2% of patients. Based on this study so far,by using the Stewart approach there is an excellent and significant correlation between the blood pH measurement from BGA and bloodpH calculation. Hyperlactatemia and hyperchloremia are the main causes of the metabolic acidosis in patients of the ICU ward.

Traditional approach versus Stewart approach for acid–base disorders: Inconsistent evidence

Purpose: The traditional approach and the Stewart approach have been developed for evaluating acid–base phenomena. While some experts have suggested that the two approaches are essentially identical, clinical researches have still been conducted on the superiority of one approach over the other one. In this review, we summarize the concepts of each approach and investigate the reasons of the discrepancy, based on current evidence from the literature search. Methods: In the literature search, we completed a database search and reviewed articles comparing the Stewart approach with the traditional, bicarbonate-centered approach to November 2016. Results: Our literature review included 17 relevant articles, 5 of which compared their diagnostic abilities, 9 articles compared their prognostic performances, and 3 articles compared both diagnostic abilities and prognostic performances. These articles show a discrepancy over the abilities to detect acid–base disturbances and to predict patients’ outcomes. There are many limitations that could yield this discrepancy, including differences in calculation of the variables, technological differences or errors in measuring variables, incongruences of reference value, normal range of the variables, differences in studied populations, and confounders of prognostic strength such as lactate. Conclusion: In conclusion, despite the proposed equivalence between the traditional approach and the Stewart approach, our literature search shows inconsistent results on the comparison between the two approaches for diagnostic and prognostic performance. We found crucial limitations in those studies, which could lead to the reasons of the discrepancy.