Depression Following Operative Treatments for Achilles Ruptures and Ankle Fractures

Background: The sudden and debilitating nature of lower extremity injuries can trigger mood disturbances, including major depressive disorder. Methods: This prospective study enrolled patients undergoing operative repair of ankle fractures and Achilles ruptures and followed them for 1 year postoperatively. The validated Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) for depressive symptoms was administered at the preoperative visit and at postoperative weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, and 52. PHQ-9 is scored 0 to 27, with higher values indicating greater depression symptoms. Results: Fifty-eight patients completed 1 year of follow-up. The mean PHQ-9 score was 2.7 (range, 0-20) at the preoperative visit, peaked at postoperative week 1 (4.9; range, 0-16), and reached its low at postoperative week 52 (0.8; range, 0-7). Cumulative incidences of depressive symptoms during the first year following surgery were 51.7% for at least mild depression, 22.4% for at least moderate depression, and 6.9% for severe depression. A history of mental health disorder and the inability to work during the period of postoperative immobilization were independently associated with greater depressive symptoms. Conclusion: The majority of patients undergoing operative treatment of Achilles ruptures and ankle fractures develop postoperative symptoms of mild to moderate depression that normalize after several months. Patients with a history of mental health disorder or who cannot work while immobilized postoperatively are at greatest risk. Level of Evidence: Level II.

Evaluating Immediate and Short-Term Postoperative Clinical Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Ulnar Shortening for Ulnar Impaction Syndrome Using PROMIS

Background The early recovery trajectory of patients undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is unknown. Questions/Purposes Using PROMIS Upper Extremity (UE), Physical Function (PF), Pain Interference (PI), and Depression, we asked (1) do patients undergoing operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome present at their preoperative visit with notable impairment?; (2) At immediate follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity?; and (3) At short-term follow-up, do patients present with a clinically appreciable change in symptom severity? Patients and Methods We identified patients from 01/2017 to 12/2019 at our institution undergoing ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome who completed all PROMIS domains at a preoperative visit and at least one postoperative time point (i.e., less than 4 weeks and/or greater than 12 weeks). Distribution- and anchor-based minimal clinically important difference estimates were used to evaluate clinically appreciable changes in symptoms over time. Results A total of 38 patients met our inclusion criteria. The average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores from preoperative to immediate postoperative follow-up were –3.8, –4.3, 3.2, and 0.5, respectively. However, by short-term follow-up, the average change in PROMIS UE, PF, PI, and Depression scores were 3.7, 3.2, –4.7, and –3.9, respectively. Conclusions Patients have worsening function at the immediate postoperative follow-up. By short-term postoperative follow-up, functional status and PI levels improve. Our findings can help hand surgeons provide evidence-based guidance on expected initial recovery following operative management for ulnar impaction syndrome. Level of Evidence This is a level II, prognostic study.

Choroidal evaluation in patients under alpha-lytic therapy

Purpose To detect any choroidal thickness (CT) change in patients after alpha-lytic drugs withdrawal that could help in the cataract surgery timing decision. Methods Twenty-five eyes of 25 patients (mean age: 76 ± 7 years) under alpha-lytic therapy, and 25 eyes of 25 control subjects (CS) (mean age: 75 ± 7 years) without alpha-lytic therapy, both scheduled for cataract surgery in the fellow eye, were included in this observational, prospective, non-randomized study. All patients underwent EDI-OCT during the first preoperative visit and approximately 1 month (range 28–31 days) after alpha-lytic withdrawal. In the CS group, the OCT during preoperative visit and approximately 1 month after (range 28–31 days) the first examination was performed. Data normality with Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was checked and statistical evaluation with the Wilcoxon-signed rank test was performed. Results The mean subfoveal CT was 224 ± 79.7 μm during therapy and 217 ± 70.4 μm after withdrawal; 1.5 mm nasally from the fovea CT was 198 ± 83.8 μm and 194 ± 82.8 μm, respectively; and 1.5 mm temporally from the fovea CT was 217 ± 55.9 μm and 205 ± 54.4 μm, respectively. A statistically significant reduction (p < 0.05) in all the 3 measured CT points was found. In the CS no significant changes were detected (p > 0.05). Conclusion No severe floppy iris syndrome was detected at the time of surgery. In these patients, CT decrease could be an important sign for cataract surgery timing decision.

Evaluation of Selfies and Filtered Selfies and Effects on First Impressions

Background Selfies and filtered selfies are becoming more prevalent throughout society and in the facial plastic surgery clinic. The term “Snapchat dysmorphia” has been used to describe patients seeking procedures to look like their selfie or filtered selfie. This is particularly frequent in the Millennial population, aged 22 to 37 years. Objectives The authors sought to determine the effects on first impression from different photograph types: selfies, filtered selfies, a rear-facing smartphone camera, and a digital camera (DC). We hypothesize that the DC photographs will have the highest rated first impressions among evaluators despite the popularity of selfies and filtered selfies. Methods This study included 240 evaluators and 4 patients each completing the 4 different photograph types. The evaluators completed a survey rating first impression on various measures of success for each photograph type. Results A total of 960 first impressions were recorded for each of the 8 subscales, yielding 7680 individual assessments of first impression. The DC photograph was found to have the highest first impression scores among the 4 photograph types. There was no statistical difference between selfies and filtered selfies. The rear-facing smartphone camera received the lowest first impression scores. Conclusions Our findings indicate that the standard DC photograph taken during a preoperative consultation has higher first impressions than selfies or filtered selfies. Although “Snapchat dysmorphia” may continue to be a growing trend in the near future, our findings provide important information to discuss with patients in the preoperative visit to set realistic expectations.

Shared Decision-Making and Goals-of-Care Discussion in the Preoperative Visit

Utilizing shared decision-making and a structured goals of care discussion in the context of a preoperative visit is a mechanism by which surgeons may optimize patient-centered care. Goals-of-care conversations involve first exploring a person’s illness experience, values, and preferences and then information about their medical condition so that physician and patient arrive at a decision that guides medical care. In the field of surgery, this is an evolutionary step beyond informed consent when surgeon and patient are considering surgical therapy for a serious illness. The conversation ultimately includes a medical recommendation integrating the current clinical situation with the patient’s values and wishes. The discussion and subsequent decision(s) are translated into a plan of care.

Should every candidate for cataract extraction be scheduled to the preoperative clinic? The Rabin Medical Center experience

Background: Cataract surgery is one of the most common elective surgeries. We present a novel approach of preoperative triage using community-based ophthalmologist referral letters for scheduling surgery, thus reducing both patient and physician time prior to surgery. Since most patients are not routinely examined in a preoperative clinic, day of surgery cancelations are a possibility. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of our triage system. Methods: Historical prospective study in which the end point was day-of-surgery cancelation. The main outcome measure of this study was the rate of cancelations which could have been prevented by a preoperative visit. Patients’ records were reviewed for reasons for cancelation and demographics. Results: During the study period, 1030 patients underwent cataract surgery, 171 patients (16.6%) were examined in the preoperative clinic. Forty-five patients (4.4%) were canceled on the day of surgery due to various reasons. The main reason for cancelation (13 cases, 28.9%) was non-availability of operating theater. In 20 cases (1.9% of total patients, 44.4% of cancelations), the cancelations could have been prevented by a preoperative clinic visit. Conclusion: Our results suggests that most cataract patients do not require preoperative visit prior to the day of surgery. The cooperation of community-based ophthalmologists and the availability of senior surgeons in the operating theater allows for the proper implementation of our system. Direct referral to surgery could shorten both costs and time to surgery and provide timely treatment for cataracts in a cost-aware environment.