writing technologies
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

51
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
pp. 100308
Author(s):  
Shahriar Bakrani Balani ◽  
Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar ◽  
Mehdi Chougan ◽  
Eujin Pei ◽  
Erdem Şahin

2021 ◽  
pp. 100257
Author(s):  
Shahriar Bakrani Balani ◽  
Seyed Hamidreza Ghaffar ◽  
Mehdi Chougan ◽  
Eujin Pei ◽  
Erdem Şahin

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John-Patrick Udo

In this thesis the viability of using visual art and technology to motivate children to write stories is explored from a pedagogical and empirical perspective. A study was devised where forty-two children in grades four and five participated in a visual art workshop where they created a drawing and an accompanying story. In addition, the children were provided with three different technologies through which to record their stories: handwriting, dictating and typing. The children were required to produce a sample handwritten story for comparison to those written with one of these technologies. Results indicate that although children reported being motivated to communicate through visual art and alternative writing technologies, the stories created after the workshop and assessed by a teacher-developed rubric were significantly worse than the sample stories and the expected performance levels of the provincial Education and Accountability Office (EQAO). Reasons for this outcome could be that children lack experience communicating through alternative means, and that they are more concerned with the technicalities of authorship such as spelling, grammar and formatting in their drawings and writing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
John-Patrick Udo

In this thesis the viability of using visual art and technology to motivate children to write stories is explored from a pedagogical and empirical perspective. A study was devised where forty-two children in grades four and five participated in a visual art workshop where they created a drawing and an accompanying story. In addition, the children were provided with three different technologies through which to record their stories: handwriting, dictating and typing. The children were required to produce a sample handwritten story for comparison to those written with one of these technologies. Results indicate that although children reported being motivated to communicate through visual art and alternative writing technologies, the stories created after the workshop and assessed by a teacher-developed rubric were significantly worse than the sample stories and the expected performance levels of the provincial Education and Accountability Office (EQAO). Reasons for this outcome could be that children lack experience communicating through alternative means, and that they are more concerned with the technicalities of authorship such as spelling, grammar and formatting in their drawings and writing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 140-146
Author(s):  
Erin Workman ◽  
Peter Vandenberg ◽  
Madeline Crozier

This article reports findings from an institutional ethnography of university stakeholders’ writing in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, illustrating the affordances of this methodology for professional and technical communication. Drawing on interview transcripts with faculty and administrators from across the university, the authors contextualize the role of writing in the iterative, collaborative, distributed writing processes by which the university transitioned from a traditional A–F grading scheme to a pass or fail option in just a few business days. They analyze these stakeholders’ experiences, discussing some effects of this accelerated timeline on policy development, writing processes, and uses of writing technologies within this new context of remote teaching and learning.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document