A catalytic-independent function of human DNA polymerase Kappa controls the stability and abundance of the Checkpoint Kinase 1

DNA polymerase kappa (Pol κ) has been well documented thus far for its specialized DNA synthesis activity during translesion replication, progression of replication forks through regions difficult to replicate, restart of stalled forks and replication checkpoint efficiency. Pol κ is also required for the stabilization of stalled forks although the mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we unveiled an unexpected role for Pol κ in controlling the stability and abundance of Chk1, an important actor for the replication checkpoint and fork stabilization. We found that loss of Pol κ decreased the Chk1 protein level in the nucleus of four human cell lines. Pol κ and not the other Y‐family polymerase members is required to maintain the Chk1 protein pool all along the cell cycle. We showed that Pol κ depletion affected the protein stability of Chk1 and protected it from proteasome degradation. Importantly, we also observed that the fork restart defects observed in Pol κ-depleted cells could be overcome by the re-expression of Chk1. Strikingly, this new function of Pol κ does not require its catalytic activity. We propose that Pol κ could contribute to the protection of stalled forks through Chk1 stability.

Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplications epigenetically activates checkpoint kinase 1 in acute myeloid leukemia cells

It is not clear how Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD) regulates checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this study, we investigated the regulatory effect of FLT3-ITD on CHK1. Our results showed that CHK1 was highly expressed in FLT3-ITD positive AML. The overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate of AML patients with high CHK1 level were lower than those of patients with low CHK1 level. Mechanistically, FLT3-ITD recruited p300 to the CHK1 promoter and subsequently acetylated H3K27, thereby enhancing the transcription of CHK1. Interfering with the expression of CHK1 significantly inhibited the cell proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in FLT3-ITD positive MV4-11 cells. In addition, CHK1 knockdown promoted the sensitivity of MV4-11 cells to the epigenetic inhibitors JQ1 and C646. This study discovers a new therapeutic target for FLT3-ITD + AML and provided evidence for the combination of epigenetic inhibitors for AML treatment.

Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibition fails to activate the Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) innate immune signalling in a human coculture cancer system

Utilising Checkpoint Kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitors to increase cytoplasmic DNA may be a potential strategy to increase the sensitivity of tumours to immune checkpoint modulators. The appearance of DNA in the cytoplasm can drive Cyclic GMP-AMP Synthase-2′,3′-Cyclic Guanosine Monophosphate–Adenosine Monophosphate-Stimulator of Interferon Genes (cGAS-cGAMP-STING) inflammatory, anti-tumour T-cell activity via a type I interferon (IFN) and nuclear factor-κB response. In the THP1-Dual reporter cell line, the STING agonist cGAMP activated both reporters, and increased phosphorylation of the innate immune pathway signallers Tank Binding Kinase 1 (TBK1) and Interferon Regulatory Factor (IRF) 3. Inhibition of Chk1 increased TBK1 but not IRF3 phosphorylation and did not induce IRF or NF-κB reporter activation. cGAMP induced a Type I IFN response in THP1 cells whereas inhibition of Chk1 did not. HT29 or HCC1937 cell treatment with a Chk1 inhibitor increased cytoplasmic dsDNA in treated HCC1937 but not HT29 cells and increased IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1-Dual cells. HT29 cells pre-treated with gemcitabine or camptothecin had elevated cytoplasmic dsDNA and IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1-Dual cells. Camptothecin or gemcitabine plus a Chk1 inhibitor increased cytoplasmic dsDNA but Chk1 inhibition suppressed IRF reporter activation in cocultured THP1 cells. In THP1-Dual cells treated with cGAMP, Chk1 inhibition suppressed the activation of the IRF reporter compared to cGAMP alone. These results suggest that, in some cellular models, there is little evidence to support the combination of Chk1 inhibitors with immune checkpoint modulators and, in some combination regimes, may even prove deleterious.

New Natural Compound Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinase-1(CHK1) Based on Computational Study

As a malignant tumor of the ovary, the general treatment principle of ovarian cancer is surgical treatment, supplemented by chemotherapy, and some patients can use targeted drugs. Its treatment effect is relatively poor, so the prognosis is poor, the mortality rate is high. To contribute to drug design and refinement, ideal lead compounds with potential inhibitory effects on ATP-competitive CHK1 (Checkpoint kinase-1) inhibitors were downloaded from the drug library (ZINC15 database) and screened afterwards. The ATP-competitive CHK1 inhibitors were identified by using computer-aided virtual screening technology. We first calculated the LibDock score through the docking of proteins and molecules, and then analyzed the pharmacological and toxicological properties. Then, we performed precise docking of the small molecules selected in the above steps with CHK1 protein to analyze their docking mechanism and affinity. Next, we used molecular dynamics simulation to make a assessment if the ligand-CHK1 complex were stable in natural environment. As the result shown, ZINC000008214547 and ZINC000072103632 were proved to bind with CHK1 with a higher binding affinity and stability. Additionally, their toxicological analysis shows that they are less toxic and will not inhibit the activity of cytochrome P-450 2D6. In the simulation of molecular dynamics, we also found that ZINC000008214547-CHK1 and ZINC000072103632-CHK1 complexes’ potential energy were more favorable compared with reference ligand, Prexasertib. Not only that, the two complexes also showed better stability in the natural environment. So, all results elucidated that ZINC000008214547 and ZINC000072103632 were favorable lead inhibitors of CHK1 protein. ZINC000008214547 and ZINC000072103632 were safe and had the potential to inhibit CHK1 protein. They may contribute a solid foundation for the development of CHK1 target drug.