Interaction between economy and law through the example of China: from the retrospective to the development prospect. A critical analysis and comparison with developed democracies

It is generally considered that the keystone of successful economic development of the state is its effective legal system with its priority dwelling upon protection of human rights. However, is this formula operational in the case of China with its authoritarian political regime for which the fundamental law is the will of the party leader? The article investigates how the transformation of the legal system of China has been progressing over the past seventy years and how these processes correlate with the reforms in the economy. Profound cause and effect relations between mental reference points of the Chinese people and the «fragility» of the institution of law in this country have been revealed. The paper presents the results of the analysis conducted in relation to the indicators of socio-economic progress and the rule of law within the country in comparison with similar indicators of nine most successful countries in the world. It is proven that the formal law in China serves as a mere instrument for a farsighted, authoritarian and rigidly hierarchical political system which uses economic levers with the purpose of achieving ambitious goals of conquering the entire world.

The philosophy of triple strategic perception (Thinking - thinking - thought)

This research formed of introduction, three axes, conclusion and epilogue as follows: first axis: philosophy's cognition, second axis titled: Ramp's cognition, and third axis contents programming cognition, and the research finalized with a list of conclusions which aligned and fortified that mental philosophy, for example: the thinking is a result of meditation and the industry of thought, it is only a mental innovative industry depends on possession the information's and analytical ability of image in mental memory. And the mental philosophy establishes a mental reference which basis on mental rationality and the changes of performance and it's continuous re-generations (because of mental ability's elements ) has its effects on wording the thinking and deliver the thought. And re-programming it responding to changes, and the thought is synthesis of thinking. Finally, the cognition is the base of thinking and theorizing is the base of thought

Transcendental Idealism Without Tears

This chapter is an attempt to explain Kantian transcendental idealism to contemporary metaphysicians and make clear its relevance to contemporary debates in what is now called ‘meta-ontology.’ It first introduces some Kantian ideas about what objects are and argues that we understand the concept <object> through understanding what can be the referent of singular mental reference by some intellect (what Kant calls an ‘intuition’), human or otherwise. It then argues that explanatory understanding requires the ability to understand instances of relevant concepts, which in turn requires the ability to intuit objects that instantiate relevant concepts. This places a constraint on our ontology: we can have explanatory understanding only if our quantifiers are restricted to objects we can intuit (so-called ‘phenomena’). We can speculate about some of the recherché objects of contemporary metaphysics (e.g. physical simples, instantaneous temporal parts) but we cannot understand them.

Physical Influence and Mental Reference

In a scientific discussion of the processes which we (or some of us) designate “vital,” attention is concentrated on an interpretation of that which happens within a relational system of physical influence. In a scientific discussion of the processes which we reflectively distinguish as “mental,” attention is directed to what occurs in a relational system of psychological reference. We should seek to distinguish each from the other in any given context where both are in evidence.