“Endourological closure of a malformative vascular source of bleeding using the VortX 0.018” coil®”

Aims: Renal vascular malformations, congenital or acquired, are sometimes challenging for urologists and interventional radiologists to resolve. Arterovenous fistulas and pseudoaneuryms are usually embolized by interventional radiologists, with a low rate of complications. We propose a new endourological/interventional radiology technique to treat a source of arterovenous bleeding coming from a renal calyx in a minimally invasive way. Methods: A combined endourological and interventional radiology procedure is described, using a Flexible Fiberoptic Ureteroscopes to undertake a retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) to identify the source of bleeding; subsequently the VortX Coil® is inserted through a microcatheter to stop the bleeding and the correct position of the VortX coil is evaluated. Furthermore, we made a literature research on Pubmed and Medline to look for similar procedures. Results: In case of a renal bleeding that could not be treated by endovascular way, a combined urological and interventional radiology procedure can be undertaken. We did not find similar endourological and interventional radiology procedure on Pubmed and Medline, so this is the first tecnique of endourological closure of a bleeding point using a coil. Conclusion: From our experience this could be a mininvasive technique to solve renal bleedings coming from a calyx that are not found by endovascular approach. Indeed, in our knowledge, the technique here described is the first that provides the use of an endovascular coil by endourological way in renal vascular malformations.

Trends of Interventional Radiology procedures during the Covid-19 pandemic: The first 27 weeks in the eye of the storm

ObjectivesWhile the Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic looks to persist, institutions promote delaying procedures. Understanding trends and demands of interventional radiology (IR) procedures in the infected and COVID-free populations are needed in long-term planning. We detail IR procedure trends in the first 27 weeks of the pandemic and compare with the pre-pandemic era. MethodsIn this IRB approved retrospective electronic case review, all IR patients in our institution from 1 January to 9 July 2020, the same period in 2019 pre-pandemic and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV) outbreak were included. IR procedures were classified using Interventional Radiology – Procedure Acuity Scale (IR-PAS) and category of IR procedures. Along with descriptive frequencies, the Mann-Whitney U test and Chi-square test of independence were performed.ResultsDuring the pandemic, 3655 IR procedures were performed compared to 3851 procedures pre-pandemic. No statistically significant difference in weekly IR caseloads across IR-PAS tiers between both periods (p = .088) and category of procedure (p = .054) were noted. General intervention procedures remained the largest proportion and musculoskeletal procedures the minority, in both periods. More general intervention radiology and oncology procedures were performed during the Covid-19 pandemic compared to the SARS-CoV outbreak. Thirty-four (0.93%) IR procedures were performed on 30 COVID-19 patients. There was no IR procedure-related COVID-19 cross-transmission. ConclusionsDemand for IR procedures among COVID-free patients remains high, and IR procedures involving COVID-19 represents a fraction of the IR caseload. A sustainable model in providing timely IR services to COVID-free patients needs to be considered.