uresiphita reversalis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2014 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-308
Author(s):  
Ignacio P. Chávez-Sánchez ◽  
Enrique A. Mundaca ◽  
José Tulio Mendez-Montiel ◽  
Rodolfo Campos Bolaños

2002 ◽  
Vol 61 (8) ◽  
pp. 987-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Nihei ◽  
Kozo Shibata ◽  
Isao Kubo

1991 ◽  
Vol 46 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1080-1088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wink ◽  
Clytia B. Montllor ◽  
Elizabeth A. Bernays ◽  
Ludger Witte

Larvae of Uresiphita reversalis feed almost exclusively on legumes of the tribe Genisteae, whose characteristic secondary metabolites are quinolizidine alkaloids (QA). Aposematic larvae store host plant-derived QA in their integument, while the pupae are almost alkaloid-free. In the last instar larvae, alkaloids were concentrated in the larval head, possibly in the silk glands. About 80% of the alkaloids were transferred to the cocoon silk and 19% were lost with larval exuviae.The larval alkaloid pattern was characterized by capillary GLC and GLC-MS and compared to that of the host plant, Teline monspessulana. Whereas the host plant contained mainly epiaphylline, dehydroaphylline and aphylline, larvae selectively accumulated N-methylcytisine, a relatively minor component of the plant QA; the faeces contained mainly epiaphylline and dehydroaphylline. Thus uptake and sequestration must be selective processes. Uptake by isolated larval midguts was time-, pH- and temperature-dependent and displayed an activation energy between 50 and 80 kJ/mol. Furthermore the in vitro uptake of 13-hydroxylupanine was competitively inhibited by cytisine. All these data provide evidence that QA uptake does not proceed by simple diffusion but instead with the aid of a carrier mechanism; this could explain the differential alkaloid uptake observed in living larvae.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document