multiple use management
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

55
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

10
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Ecosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine M. Brice ◽  
Brett A. Miller ◽  
Hongchao Zhang ◽  
Kirsten Goldstein ◽  
Scott N. Zimmer ◽  
...  

Fisheries ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 396-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett B. Roper ◽  
James M. Capurso ◽  
Yvette Paroz ◽  
Michael K. Young

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Linh-Son ◽  
Quentin Grafton ◽  
To Dieu-Hang ◽  
Tom Kompas

2012 ◽  
Vol 88 (06) ◽  
pp. 697-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Teitelbaum ◽  
Ryan Bullock

Ontario’s County, Municipal and Conservation Authority forests have received little attention within the academic literature on community forestry in Canada. These “Agreement Forests”, as they were once called, are a product of the early 20th century and have been under local government management since the 1990s. Most are situated in Southern Ontario. In this article we investigate the extent to which community forestry principles are at work in these forests. Three principles— participatory governance, local benefits and multiple forest use—are analyzed using a composite score approach derived from survey data collected from nearly all of these forest organizations (response rate = 80%). Results indicate that most of these organizations do display attributes associated with community forestry principles, including a local governance process, public participation activities, local employment and multiple-use management. Traditional forestry employment is less strong than in similar studies of Crown land community forests; however, there is an important emphasis on non-timber activities. The article concludes that the County, Municipal and Conservation Authority forests represents a unique approach, which reflects the specific geographic and socio-economic context in which it resides.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document